首页|期刊导航|临床误诊误治|人工流产术后宫腔粘连误诊为子宫腺肌病、异位妊娠原因分析

人工流产术后宫腔粘连误诊为子宫腺肌病、异位妊娠原因分析OA

Causes of misdiagnosis of intrauterine adhesions after induced abortion as uterine adenomyosis or ectopic pregnancy

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 分析子宫人工流产术后宫腔粘连误诊为子宫腺肌病、异位妊娠的原因.方法 回顾性分析2024年1月—2025年1月石家庄市人民医院收治的子莒人工流产术后宫腔粘连误诊为子宫腺肌病、异位妊娠2例患者的临床资料.结果 1例因1年前人工流产后出现月经量减少及进行性加重的痛经,被误诊为子宫腺肌病,并接受亮丙瑞林治疗,效果不佳且停药后加重.进一步宫腔镜检查发现右侧宫腔粘连伴积液,病理检查排除腺肌病,最终确诊为人工流产术后宫腔粘连.误诊时间长达1年.确诊后行宫腔镜下粘连分离术,术后放置宫内节育器并辅以雌孕激素序贯治疗,病情明显好转.1例人工流产术后38 d无月经来潮,因突发下腹持续性疼痛被误诊为异位妊娠.剖腹探查术中发现腹腔积血,行左侧卵巢部分切除(切除渗血区域),但病理证实为黄体组织,排除了异位妊娠.术后患者仍闭经,经宫腔镜检查最终确诊为人工流产术后宫腔粘连.误诊时间约1个月.随后行宫腔镜下粘连分离术,术后放置宫内节育器并辅以雌孕激素序贯治疗,病情明显好转.2例经术后宫腔镜二次探查及长期随访显示,宫腔形态与内膜厚度均恢复正常,月经周期规律,无粘连复发.结论 子宫人工流产术后宫腔粘连的临床表现与子宫腺肌病、异位妊娠存在重叠,缺乏特异性诊断指标,临床医师应重视患者人工流产史,结合宫腔镜检查及病理结果以提高诊断准确率,避免误诊导致不当治疗.

Objective To analyze the cause of misdiagnosis of intrauterine adhesions(IUA)after induced abortion as uterine adenomyosis or ectopic pregnancy.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 2 patients who were admitted to Shijiazhuang People's Hospital from January 2024 to December 2025 due to misdiagnosis of IUA after induced abortion as uterine adenomyosis or ectopic pregnancy.Results One patient presented with reduced menstrual flow and progressively worsening dysmenorrhea one year after induced abortion.She was misdiagnosed as having uterine adenomyosis and received treatment with Leuprorelin,which was ineffective and the symptoms worsened after discontinuation of the medication.Further hysteroscopy revealed right IUA with fluid accumulation.Pathological examination ruled out adenomyosis.Eventually,she was diagnosed with IUA after induced abortion.The misdiagnosis lasted for one year.After diagnosis,a hysteroscopic adhesiolysis was performed,followed by the placement of an intrauterine device and sequential administration of estrogen and progesterone,with marked improvement.The other patient had no menstrual flow at 38 d after induced abortion and was misdiagnosed as having ectopic pregnancy due to persistent lower abdominal pain.During laparotomy exploration,intra-abdominal bleeding was found,and a partial resection of the left ovary(removing the bleeding area)was performed.However,the pathology confirmed it as luteal tissue,ruling out ectopic pregnancy.The patient still had amenorrhea after the operation,and a hysteroscopic examination finally confirmed IUA after induced abortion.The misdiagnosis lasted for approximately one month.Subsequently,a hysteroscopic adhesiolysis was performed,followed by the placement of an intrauterine device and sequential administration of estrogen and progesterone,with significant improvement.Two patients showed that the uterine cavity morphology and endometrial thickness returned to normal after secondary hysteroscopy and long-term follow-up after the surgery.The menstrual cycle was regular,and there was no recurrence of adhesions.Conclusion The clinical manifestations of IUA after artificial abortion overlap with those of uterine adenomyosis and ectopic pregnancy,with no specific diagnostic indicators.Clinicians should pay attention to the patient's history of induced abortion and integrate hysteroscopic findings with pathological results to improve the diagnostic accuracy and avoid improper treatment due to misdiagnosis.

李海燕;王晓静;梁汉波;陈海龙

石家庄市人民医院妇科,石家庄 050011石家庄市人民医院中医科,石家庄 050011石家庄市人民医院妇科,石家庄 050011石家庄市人民医院妇科,石家庄 050011

人工流产术宫腔粘连误诊子宫腺肌病异位妊娠宫腔镜检查

induced abortionintrauterine adhesionsmisdiagnosisuterine adenomyosisectopic pregnancyhysteroscopic examination

《临床误诊误治》 2026 (18)

1-7,7

石家庄市科技局计划项目(221460423)

10.3969/j.issn.1002-3429.2026.18.001

评论