单、双侧经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效比较OA
The clinical efficacy comparison of unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebroplasty lumbar compression fracture
目的 比较单侧与双侧经皮椎体成形术(PVP)治疗骨质疏松性腰椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)的疗效.方法 根据手术穿刺路径不同将80例OVCF患者分为单侧PVP组(采用单侧PVP治疗,40例)与双侧PVP组(采用双侧PVP治疗,40例).比较两组手术情况、伤椎前缘高度、疼痛VAS评分、ODI及术后并发症发生情况.结果 患者均获得随访,时间6~12个月.手术时间、术中出血量、骨水泥注入量单侧PVP组均短(少)于双侧PVP组(P<0.01),住院时间两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).术后7 d及6个月,伤椎前缘高度、疼痛VAS评分、ODI两组均较术前改善(P<0.05),两组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).术后并发症发生率单侧PVP组低于双侧PVP组(P<0.05).结论 单侧与双侧PVP治疗OVCF均可显著缓解患者术后疼痛,改善腰椎功能状态,具有明确的临床疗效.相较于双侧入路,单侧PVP在缩短手术时间、降低并发症发生率、减少术中出血量及骨水泥注入量方面具有优势.
Objective To compare the efficacy of unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP)in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebroplasty compression fractures(OVCF).Methods The 80 patients with OVCFs were divided into the unilateral PVP group(treated with unilateral PVP,40 cases)and the bilateral PVP group(treated with bilateral PVP,40 cases)based on the different surgical puncture approach.The surgical conditions,anterior edge vertebral height of the injured vertebrae,pain VAS,ODI,and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared.Results All patients were followed up for 6-12 months.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,and bone cement injection volume in the unilateral PVP group were shorter(less)than those in the bilateral PVP group(P<0.05),while there was no statistically significant difference in hospital stay between the two groups(P>0.05).At 7 d and 6 months after surgery,the anterior edge vertebral height of the injured vertebrae,pain VAS,and ODI of both groups improved,compared with those before surgery(P<0.05),and there were no statisti-cally significant differences for above data between the two groups(P>0.05).The incidence of postoperative com-plications in the unilateral PVP group was lower than that in the bilateral PVP group(P<0.05).Conclusions Both unilateral and bilateral PVP for the treatment of OVCF can significantly alleviate postoperative pain in patients and improve the functional status of the lumbar spine,demonstrating clear clinical efficacy.Compared with the bilat-eral approach,unilateral PVP has advantages in shortening the operation time,reducing intraoperative blood loss and the volume of bone cement injected.
王政;薛睿;张迪
河北医科大学第三医院脊柱外科,河北石家庄 050051河北医科大学第三医院脊柱外科,河北石家庄 050051河北医科大学第三医院脊柱外科,河北石家庄 050051
医药卫生
经皮穿刺椎体成形术骨质疏松椎体压缩骨折
percutaneous vertebroplastyosteoporosisvertebroplasty compression fracture
《临床骨科杂志》 2026 (4)
482-486,5
国家自然科学基金面上项目(编号:82072454)
评论