两种穿刺方法在经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折中的应用比较OA
Application comparison of two puncturing methods in percutaneous vertebroplasty for treat-ment of the osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
目的 比较在经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)中行单侧双平面穿刺与双侧双平面穿刺的疗效.方法 将84例采用经皮椎体成形术治疗的OVCF患者按穿刺方法的不同分为A组(术中行双侧双平面穿刺,48例)与B组(术中行单侧双平面穿刺,36例).比较两组手术情况、骨水泥渗漏率、疼痛VAS评分、ODI及并发症发生情况.结果 患者均获得随访,时间8~13(9.5±1.5)个月.手术时间、术中透视次数A组长(多)于B组(P<0.01),骨水泥注入量、骨水泥渗漏率两组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).A组骨水泥弥散均为优良;B组4例冠状位水泥弥散差,其余均为优良.疼痛VAS评分及ODI两组术后1 d、末次随访时均较术前改善(P<0.01),术后1 d、末次随访时两组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 经皮椎体成形术中行单侧双平面穿刺与双侧双平面穿刺治疗OVCF均能获得满意疗效.双侧双平面穿刺虽然手术时间长、透视次数多,但骨水泥分布更好;单侧双平面穿刺冠状面离中线较远时,容易出现骨水泥在冠状面分布不良,推荐双平面法行对侧穿刺.
Objective To compare the therapeutic effects of unilateral two-plane puncture and bilateral two-plane puncture in percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP)for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture(OVCF).Methods The 84 patients with OVCFs who underwent PVP were divided into group A(The 48 cases were performed with bilat-eral two-plane puncture during the operation)and group B(The 36 cases were performed with unilateral two-plane puncture during the operation)based on the different puncture methods.The surgical conditions,bone cement leak-age ratio,pain VAS,ODI,and complications of the two groups were compared.Results All patients were followed up for 8-13(9.5±1.5)months.The operation time and the times of intraoperative fluoroscopy in group A were lon-ger(more)than those in group B(P<0.01),while there were no statistically significant differences in the volume of bone cement injection and the rate of bone cement leakage between the two groups(P>0.05).The bone cement dis-persion in group A was all excellent,while in group B,4 cases did not reach excellent grading due to poor dispersion of bone cement in the coronal plane,and the other cases were excellent.At 1 d after the operation and the last follow-up,the pain VAS and ODI of both groups improved,compared with those before the operation(P<0.01),but there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions PVP with unilateral two-plane puncture and bilateral two-plane puncture for treating OVCF can both achieve satisfactory therapeutic effects.The bilateral two-plane puncture method has a longer operation time and more fluoroscopic exposures,while the bone cement distribution is better;when the center-line of the coronal plane is far from the center in unilateral two-plane puncture,it is prone to poor distribution of bone cement in the coronal plane,and the bilateral two-plane puncture method is recommended for contralateral puncture.
柴明祥;张金龙;崔贺龙;魏嘉琦;宋军旗;段志锋
淇县人民医院骨二科,河南鹤壁 456750淇县人民医院骨二科,河南鹤壁 456750淇县人民医院骨二科,河南鹤壁 456750淇县人民医院骨二科,河南鹤壁 456750淇县人民医院骨二科,河南鹤壁 456750淇县人民医院骨二科,河南鹤壁 456750
医药卫生
经皮椎体成形术骨质疏松椎体压缩骨折骨水泥分布手术入路
percutaneous vertebroplastyosteoporosisvertebral compression fracturedistribution of bone cementsurgery approach
《临床骨科杂志》 2026 (4)
474-477,4
评论