首页|期刊导航|建筑结构学报|高强珊瑚骨料混凝土梁受剪承载力试验研究与设计方法评估

高强珊瑚骨料混凝土梁受剪承载力试验研究与设计方法评估OA

Experimental study and evaluation of design methods for shear capacity of reinforced high-strength coral aggregate concrete beams

中文摘要英文摘要

为研究高强珊瑚骨料混凝土(high-strength coral aggregate concrete,HSCAC)梁的受剪性能,系统开展该类梁的试验和理论研究.设计并制作8根珊瑚骨料混凝土梁,考虑影响因素包括剪跨比(1~2.5)、混凝土强度等级(C30~C70)、纵筋配筋率(2.06%~2.55%)及面积配箍率(0.25%~0.38%).通过三点加载剪切试验,对其破坏模式、承载能力、钢筋应变发展等情况展开分析.进而,评估ACI318-19、GB 50010-2010以及拉-压杆模型(STM)对CAC梁受剪承载力的预测效果.试验结果表明:HSCAC受剪梁呈现4种破坏模式,包括剪压、斜压、弯剪以及剪切黏结破坏;发生剪压或斜压破坏时,HSCAC梁混凝土剥落较普通强度CAC梁严重;受剪承载力受剪跨比和混凝土强度的影响最为显著.设计方法方面,ACI 318-19和GB 50010-2010的受剪承载力公式均给出了偏于保守的预测结果,计算与试验结果比值的平均值分别为0.31和0.56.同时,仅考虑斜向和水平压杆破坏的STM可获得较高的预测精度,其预测与试验结果比值的平均值为0.92.在此基础上,建议抗剪设计优先选用GB 50010-2010或同时考虑斜压杆、水平压杆和拉杆破坏的STM进行偏安全设计,而采用仅考虑斜向和水平压杆破坏的STM进行精确预测.

To investigate the shear performance of reinforced high-strength coral aggregate concrete(HSCAC)beams,both experimental and theoretical studies were carried out.A total of eight shear beams were tested,using a three-point loading scheme,to investigate the failure patterns,load-carrying capacity and strain development in reinforcements.The parameters considered for test specimens were shear span-to-depth ratio(1-2.5),grade of concrete strength(C30~C70),area ratio of longitudinal rebars(2.06%-2.55%)and stirrups(0.25%-0.38%).Further,the predictive performances of ACI 318-19 and GB 50010-2010 formulas as well as the simple strut-and-tie model(STM)to calculate the shear capacity were evaluated and compared in detail.The test results identify four failure modes which are found for HSCAC shear beams,including the shear-compression,diagonal compression,shear-flexural and shear-bond failure;the concrete spalling of HSCAC beams with a shear-compression or diagonal compression failure are more severe than ordinary concrete specimen;the shear strength is significantly affected by shear span-to-depth ratio and concrete strength.As for the design methods to determine shear capacity of HSCAC beams,the ACI 318-19 and GB 50010-2010 equations would provide conservative predictions,with an average predicted-to-test shear capacity ratio of 0.31 and 0.56,respectively.Meanwhile,the STM,which only considers the failure of inclined and horizontal struts,could obtain a relatively higher predictive accuracy,with a mean value of predicted-to-test shear capacity ratio of 0.92.Based on the analysis,GB 50010-2010 formula or the STM,simultaneously considering the destruction of tie,inclined and horizontal struts,are suggested for conservative shear design,and the STM,only considering the failure of inclined and horizontal struts,for precise prediction.

姚刚峰;刘文渊;付强;于潇;朱磊;蔡新江

苏州科技大学土木工程学院,江苏苏州 215011苏州科技大学土木工程学院,江苏苏州 215011军事科学院国防工程研究院目标易损性评估全国重点实验室,北京 100850||军事科学院国防工程研究院,北京 100850军事科学院国防工程研究院目标易损性评估全国重点实验室,北京 100850||军事科学院国防工程研究院,北京 100850苏州科技大学土木工程学院,江苏苏州 215011苏州科技大学土木工程学院,江苏苏州 215011

建筑与水利

高强珊瑚骨料混凝土拉-压杆模型受剪试验受剪性能受剪承载力

high-strength coral aggregate concretestrut-and-tie modelshear testshear behaviorshear strength calculation

《建筑结构学报》 2026 (8)

123-133,11

国家自然科学基金项目(12102476).

10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2025.0511

评论