首页|期刊导航|检验医学与临床|血清GRP78、SFRP1对急性肺栓塞患者危险分层的诊断价值及对患者预后不良的预测价值

血清GRP78、SFRP1对急性肺栓塞患者危险分层的诊断价值及对患者预后不良的预测价值OA

Diagnostic value of serum GRP78 and SFRP1 for risk stratification and predictive value for poor prognosis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 探讨血清葡萄糖调节蛋白78(GRP78)、分泌型卷曲相关蛋白1(SFRP1)对急性肺栓塞(APE)患者危险分层的诊断价值及对患者预后不良的预测价值.方法 选取2023年6月至2025年6月该院收治的120例APE患者作为APE组,根据危险分层将患者分为中高危组(52例)和低危组(68例).另选取同期在该院体检的120例健康志愿者作为对照组.收集所有研究对象基线资料.采用酶联免疫吸附试验检测所有研究对象血清GRP78、SFRP1、肌钙蛋白Ⅰ水平.根据住院期间的预后情况将患者分为预后不良组与预后良好组.采用多因素Logistic回归分析APE患者危险分层为中高危和预后不良的影响因素.绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析血清GRP78、SFRP1单独及二者联合对APE患者危险分层为中高危的诊断价值和预后不良的预测价值,采用Bootstrap法对血清Foxo4、MG53水平联合模型进行内部验证.采用决策分析曲线(DCA)预测模型的实用性.结果 APE组血清GRP78、SFRP1水平均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).中高危组肺栓塞严重指数(PESI)分级为Ⅲ~Ⅳ级患者占比、预后不良患者占比及血清肌钙蛋白Ⅰ、GRP78、SFRP1水平均高于低危组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,PE-SI分级为Ⅲ~Ⅳ级及血清肌钙蛋白Ⅰ、GRP78、SFRP1水平升高均是APE患者危险分层为中高危的独立危险因素(P<0.05).ROC曲线分析结果显示,血清GRP78、SFRP1单独及二者联合诊断APE患者危险分层为中高危的AUC分别为0.809、0.827、0.904,二者联合诊断的AUC大于单独诊断的AUC(Z=2.738、2.261,P<0.05).预后良好组90例,预后不良组30例.预后不良组血清GRP78、SFRP1水平均高于预后良好组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,危险分层为中高危及血清GRP78、SFRP1水平升高均为APE患者预后不良的独立危险因素(P<0.05).ROC曲线分析结果显示,血清GRP78、SFRP1单独及二者联合预测APE患者预后不良的AUC分别为0.811、0.808、0.916,二者联合预测的AUC大于单独预测的AUC(Z=2.052、2.060,P<0.05).DCA证实,GRP78、SFRP1联合模型在广泛的阈值概率范围内(0.10~0.75)具有较高的净获益优势.结论 APE患者血清GRP78、SFRP1水平均升高,其水平升高与APE患者危险分层和预后密切相关,且二者联合对于APE患者危险分层及预后具有较高的诊断和预测价值.

Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of serum glucose regulated protein 78(GRP78)and secreted frizzled-related protein 1(SFRP1)for risk stratification and poor prognosis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism(APE).Methods A total of 120 APE patients admitted to the hospital from June 2023 to June 2025 were selected as the APE group.According to the risk stratification,the patients were divided in-to medium-high risk group(52 cases)and low risk group(68 cases).Another 120 healthy volunteers who un-derwent physical examination in the hospital at the same period were selected as the control group.Baseline data of all subjects were collected.The serum levels of GRP78,SFRP1 and troponin Ⅰ were detected by en-zyme-linked immunosorbent assay.According to the prognosis of the patients during hospitalization,the pa-tients were divided into poor prognosis group and good prognosis group.Multivariate Logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of intermediate-high risk and poor prognosis in APE patients.The re-ceiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was drawn to analyze the diagnostic value of serum GRP78 and SFRP1 alone and in combination for the risk stratification of APE patients into medium and high risk and the predictive value of poor prognosis.Bootstrap method was used to internally verify the combined model of ser-um Foxo4 and MG53 levels.The decision curve analysis(DCA)was used to evaluate the practicability of the prediction model.Results The serum levels of GRP78 and SFRP1 in the APE group were higher than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The proportion of patients with pulmonary embolism severity index(PESI)grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ,the proportion of patients with poor prognosis,and the levels of serum troponin Ⅰ,GRP78,and SFRP1 in the medium-high-risk group were higher than those in the low-risk group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Multivariate Logistic regres-sion analysis showed that PESI grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ and elevated serum levels of troponin Ⅰ,GRP78,and SFRP1 were independent risk factors for moderate and high risk risk stratification in APE patients(P<0.05).The results of ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC of serum GRP78,SFRP1 alone and their combination in the diagnosis of APE patients with medium and high risk stratification were 0.809,0.827,0.904,respectively,and the AUC of the combination of the two was greater than that of the single diagnosis(Z=2.738,2.261,P<0.05).There were 90 cases in the good prognosis group and 30 cases in the poor prognosis group.The ser-um levels of GRP78 and SFRP1 in the poor prognosis group were higher than those in the good prognosis group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that elevated serum GRP78 and SFRP1 levels were independent risk factors for poor prognosis in APE patients with moderate to high risk stratification(P<0.05).ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC of ser-um GRP78,SFRP1 alone and their combination for predicting poor prognosis of APE patients were 0.811,0.808 and 0.916,respectively,and the AUC of the combination prediction was greater than that of the single prediction(Z=2.052,2.060,P<0.05).DCA confirmed that the combined model of GRP78 and SFRP1 had a high net benefit advantage within a wide range of threshold probabilities(0.10-0.75).Conclusion The ser-um levels of GRP78 and SFRP1 are increased in APE patients,which are closely related to the risk stratifica-tion and prognosis of APE patients.The combination of GRP78 and SFRP1 has high diagnosis and predictive value for the risk stratification and prognosis of APE patients.

王颖;高可;张艳峰;贾娟娟;杨林

西安交通大学第一附属医院 周围血管科,陕西西安 710061西安交通大学第一附属医院 周围血管科,陕西西安 710061西安交通大学第一附属医院 周围血管科,陕西西安 710061西安交通大学第一附属医院 周围血管科,陕西西安 710061西安交通大学第一附属医院 血管外科,陕西西安 710061

医药卫生

葡萄糖调节蛋白78分泌型卷曲相关蛋白1急性肺栓塞危险分层预后

glucose regulated protein 78secreted frizzled-related protein 1acute pulmonary embol-ismrisk stratificationprognosis

《检验医学与临床》 2026 (17)

2345-2351,2358,8

陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目(2025JC-YBQN-1081).

10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2026.17.007

评论