首页|期刊导航|全科护理|护士钝感力量表的编制及信效度检验

护士钝感力量表的编制及信效度检验OA

Development and psychometric validation of the Nurse Adaptive Insensitivity Scale

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:编制护士钝感力量表(Nurse Adaptive Insensitivity Scale,NAIS),评价其心理测量学特性,为护士钝感力研究提供测量工具.方法:以渡边淳一提出的钝感力概念为基础,融合Bandura社会认知理论、Seligman积极心理学理论及资源保存理论构建概念框架,经文献回顾、半结构化访谈及2轮德尔菲专家咨询(n=14)形成量表初稿.2024年10月—11月采用方便抽样法选取全国5所三级甲等医院480名在岗护士,以随机数字表法分为两个独立子样本(各240人),分别用于探索性因子分析(EFA)与验证性因子分析(CFA),对其中222名护士间隔2周进行重测.综合运用项目分析、EFA、CFA及多维信度分析检验量表心理测量学性能.结果:最终量表包含耐挫力(5个条目)、抗压调适力(5个条目)、积极心态(5个条目)3个维度,共15个条目,累计方差贡献率86.36%.量表水平内容效度指数平均值(S-CVI/Ave)为 0.99,条目水平内容效度指数(I-CVI)为 0.92~1.00;CFA 中比较拟合指数(CFI)=0.947,常规拟合指数(NFI)=0.933,塔克-刘易斯指数(TLI)=0.932,标准化残差均方根(SRMR)=0.023,标准化因子载荷介于0.849~0.948;组合信度(CR)为0.951~0.963,平均方差萃取值(AVE)为0.796~0.838;总量表Cronbach's α系数为0.982,折半信度为0.967,重测信度为0.988.结论:NAIS具有良好的内容效度、聚合效度和信度,三因子结构获得初步支持,条目简洁,完成时间2~3 min,可作为评估临床护士钝感力水平的工具,但模型拟合及维度区分效度仍需在更广泛的独立样本中进一步验证.

Objective:To develop the Nurse Adaptive Insensitivity Scale(NAIS)and to evaluate its psychometric properties,so as to provide a measurement tool for research on adaptive insensitivity among nurses.Methods:Based on the concept of adaptive insensitivity proposed by Junichi Watanabe,a conceptual framework was constructed by integrating Bandura's social cognitive theory,Seligman's positive psychology theory,and the conservation of resources theory.An initial draft of the scale was developed through literature review,semi-structured interviews,and two rounds of Delphi expert consultation(n=14).From October to November 2024,480 practicing nurses were recruited from five tertiary grade A hospitals across China using convenience sampling.The nurses were randomly divided into two independent subsamples(n=240 each)using a random number table,with one subsample used for exploratory factor analysis(EFA)and the other for confirmatory factor analysis(CFA).Of these nurses,222 nurses completed a retest after a two-week interval.Item analysis,EFA,CFA,and multidimensional reliability analysis were used to examine the psychometric properties of the scale.Results:The final scale comprised 15 items across three dimensions,including frustration tolerance(5 items),stress-coping adaptability(5 items),and positive mindset(5 items).The scale-level content validity index(S-CVI/Ave)was 0.99,and the item-level content validity index(I-CVI)ranged from 0.92 to 1.00.In the CFA,the comparative fit index(CFI)was 0.947,the normed fit index(NFI)was 0.933,the Tucker-Lewis index(TLI)was 0.932,and the standardized root mean square residual(SRMR)was 0.023.The standardized factor loading ranged from 0.849 to 0.948.The composite reliability(CR)ranged from 0.951 to 0.963,and the mean variance extraction value(AVE)ranged from 0.796 to 0.838.The overall Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.982,the split-half reliability was 0.967,and the test-retest reliability was 0.988.Conclusions:NAIS has good content validity,aggregated validity and reliability.Its three-factor structure has received initial support.The items are concise and the completion time is 2 to 3 minutes.It can be used as a tool to evaluate the insensitivity level of clinical nurses.However,the model fitting and dimensional discrimination validity still need to be further verified in a wider range of independent samples.

隆政达;黄丽萍

530199,广西医科大学附属武鸣医院530199,广西医科大学附属武鸣医院

护士钝感力量表钝感力心理资源心理弹性

Nurse Adaptive Insensitivity Scale,NAISadaptive insensitivitypsychological resourcesresilience

《全科护理》 2026 (17)

3199-3205,7

2023年广西高校中青年教师科研基础能力提升项目,编号:2023KY0077广西壮族自治区卫生健康委自筹经费科研课题项目,编号:Z-A20230781.

10.12104/j.issn.1674-4748.2026.17.002

评论