首页|期刊导航|康复学报|重复经颅磁刺激联合镜像疗法对脑卒中偏瘫患者的影响

重复经颅磁刺激联合镜像疗法对脑卒中偏瘫患者的影响OA

Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Mirror Therapy for Patients with Post-Stroke Hemiplegia

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 观察重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)联合镜像疗法(MT)对脑卒中偏瘫患者下肢运动功能和运动诱发电位(MEP)的影响.方法 选择2024年2月—2025年3月蚌埠医科大学第一附属医院康复科收治的60例脑卒中偏瘫患者,采用随机数字表法将其分为MT组、rTMS组和联合组,每组20例.3组患者均接受常规康复治疗.联合组在常规康复治疗基础上接受rTMS治疗,再接受镜像治疗,rTMS刺激频率1 Hz,以90%静息运动阈值(RMT)作为刺激强度,刺激位点为健侧或患侧初级运动皮层(M1)区下肢运动热点,共600个脉冲,15 min/次,1次/d,5 d/周,共4周;镜像治疗30 min/次,1次/d,5 d/周,共4周.rTMS组在常规康复治疗基础上接受rTMS治疗,再接受假镜像治疗,rTMS治疗与联合组rTMS治疗方法一致;假镜像治疗患者镜面朝向患侧肢体,背面朝向健侧肢体,其余治疗方法同联合组镜像治疗.MT组在常规康复治疗基础上接受假rTMS治疗,再接受镜像治疗,假rTMS治疗时将线圈与头皮垂直放置,其余参数与联合组rTMS治疗方法一致;镜像治疗与联合组镜像治疗方法一致.分别于治疗前后采用Fugl-Meyer下肢运动功能评定量表(FMA-LE)评定患者运动功能;采用10米步行测试(10MWT)评定患者步行功能;采用改良Barthel指数(MBI)评定日常生活活动能力;采用磁刺激仪记录患者健侧和患侧的MEP振幅和MEP潜伏期,评估神经重塑恢复情况.结果 ① FMA-LE、MBI评分和10MWT:与治疗前比较,3组治疗后FMA-LE和MBI评分均明显升高(P<0.05),10MWT均明显降低(P<0.05).与MT组、rTMS组比较,联合组治疗后FMA-LE和MBI评分均明显更高(P<0.05),10MWT明显更低(P<0.05).② MEP潜伏期和MEP振幅:与治疗前比较,3组治疗后健侧MEP潜伏期均明显升高(P<0.05),患侧MEP潜伏期均明显降低(P<0.05);3组健侧MEP振幅均明显降低(P<0.05),患侧MEP振幅均明显升高(P<0.05).与MT组、rTMS组比较,联合组健侧MEP潜伏期和患侧MEP振幅均明显更高(P<0.05),患侧MEP潜伏期明显更低(P<0.05).结论 rTMS联合MT可有效改善脑卒中偏瘫患者下肢运动功能、日常生活活动能力和运动诱发电位.

Objective To investigate the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS)combined with mirror therapy(MT)on lower limb motor function and motor evoked potentials(MEP)in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia.Methods A total of 60 patients with post-stroke hemiplegia admitted to the Department of Rehabilitation of the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University from February 2024 to March 2025 were randomly assigned into MT group,rTMS group and combined group,with 20 cases in each group.All groups received conventional rehabilitation therapy.The combined group received rTMS in addition to the conventional rehabilitation therapy,followed by mirror therapy.The rTMS was delivered at a frequency of 1 Hz with stimulation intensity at 90%of the resting motor threshold(RMT),targeting the lower-limb motor hotspot of the primary motor cor-tex(M1)on the unaffected or affected side,totaling 600 pulses,15 minutes per session,once daily,five days per week for four weeks.Mirror therapy was performed for 30 minutes per session,once daily,five days per week for four weeks.The rTMS group received the identical rTMS protocol as the combined group,followed by sham mirror therapy where the mirror's reflective surface faced the affected limb and its back faced the unaffected limb,while all other procedures maintained consistent with the mirror thera-py in the combined group.The MT group received sham rTMS with the coil positioned perpendicularly to the scalp and all other pa-rameters consistent with the protocol of the rTMS group,followed by the same mirror therapy with that of the combined group.Be-fore and after treatment,Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity(FMA-LE)was used to assess motor function;10-Meter Walk-ing Test(10MWT)was used to assess walking function;Modified Barthel Index(MBI)was used to assess activities of daily living.A magnetic stimulator was used to record the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials(MEPs)in both the affected and un-affected sides for the assessment of neural plasticity and recovery.Results(1)FMA-LE,MBI scores and 10MWT:compared with those before treatment,the FMA-LE and MBI scores in all three groups increased significantly after treatment(P<0.05),while 10MWT decreased significantly(P<0.05).Compared with the MT group and the rTMS group,FMA-LE and MBI scores in the com-bined group were significantly higher after treatment(P<0.05),and 10MWT was significantly lower after treatment(P<0.05).(2)MEP latency and amplitude:compared with those before treatment,the MEP latency on the unaffected side in all three groups was prolonged significantly after treatment(P<0.05),whereas the MEP latency on the affected side shortened significantly(P<0.05);the MEP amplitude on the unaffected side in all three groups decreased significantly(P<0.05),while the MEP amplitude on the affected side increased significantly(P<0.05).Compared with the MT group and the rTMS group,MEP latency of the unaffected side was longer and MEP amplitude of the affected side was significantly higher in the combined group(P<0.05),and MEP latency on the affected side in the combined group was significantly shorter(P<0.05).Conclusion rTMS combined with MT can effectively improve lower limb motor function,activities of daily living,and motor evoked potentials in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia.

沈孟茹;张子昂;李金帼;方芳;王红雨;王敏

蚌埠医科大学研究生院,安徽 蚌埠 233000蚌埠医科大学第一附属医院,安徽 蚌埠 233000蚌埠医科大学护理学院,安徽 蚌埠 233000蚌埠医科大学护理学院,安徽 蚌埠 233000蚌埠医科大学健康体适能中心,安徽 蚌埠 233000蚌埠医科大学第一附属医院,安徽 蚌埠 233000

脑卒中偏瘫重复经颅磁刺激镜像疗法下肢运动功能运动诱发电位

strokehemiplegiarepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationmirror therapylower limb functionmotor evoked potentials

《康复学报》 2026 (8)

553-559,7

安徽省高校科研项目(2024AH052831)蚌埠医学院重点科研平台开放课题立项项目(AHCM2023W003)

10.3724/SP.J.1329.2026.08003

评论