新质生产力视域下我国高校哲学社会科学研究评价制度的优化OACHSSCD
Optimization of the scientific research evaluation institution of philosophy and social sciences in Chinese colleges and universities under the vision of new quality productive forces:analysis from the perspective of"collective dilemma"
在教育评价破"五唯"业已形成广泛共识的背景之下,形成一种具有"集体理性"的高校哲学社会科学研究评价制度对于助推我国哲学社会科学"三大体系"建设、加快培育形成新质生产力具有重要意义.在学理阐释的基础上,文章对当前高校哲学社会科学的"集体困境"问题展开分析.研究发现,尽管高校、教师存在共同的学术旨趣和追求,但当前高校哲学社会科学领域的科研生产并未实现"以一致行为追求集体利益的最大化",学术精品缺失、文科大师匮乏以及应用价值的转化不足等问题使"集体困境"成为现实.在物化激励依然明显、优绩竞争环境不断强化以及产量导向制度设计的影响下,广大教师的理性"学术自利人"属性日益被激活并被持续强化.伴随学术精品生成空间日渐被挤压而来的是,文科大师的成长进程被阻抑,科研生产应用价值的转化意义也被遮蔽.由于制度本身即是"任何集体行动的出发点"且"塑造着微观层面的机制和随后的集体结果",故而通过"制度"纾解"集体之困"便成为当前高校哲学社会科学研究评价改革的一条重要突破口.针对当前学术精品的缺失问题,文章提出对当前过于强势的物化激励制度进行优化,除"实物"方面的激励优化外,制度还应在"虚物"方面予以支持,以为学术精品"赋能";针对当前文科大师的匮乏问题,文章提出对现有持续性的优绩竞争制度进行优化,除促进竞争的良性归位外,制度还需对那些具有一定科研发展潜能的教师提供"科研支架",以为潜在文科大师的长成"助力";针对当前科研应用价值的转化不足问题,文章提出对当前绩效至上的评价制度导向予以优化,除"对内"进一步丰富科研资源向教学领域的价值转化外,还需"对外"彰显教师成果的"转化者"身份,以为科研生产"增效".
Under the background that education evaluation"breaking the only indicator"has formed a broad consensus,shaping a set of philosophy and social sciences scientific research evaluation institution in higher education with collective rationality is of great significance for promoting the construction of the three major systems of philosophy and social science in China as well as accelerating the cultivation and formation of new quality productive forces.On the basis of theoretical interpretation,the article analyzes the"collective dilemma"in the current philosophy and social sciences research in colleges and universities.The study finds that although universities and teachers have common academic interests and pursuits,the current philosophy and social sciences scientific research and production in colleges and universities have not achieved the maximum pursuit of collective interests with consistent behavior,the lack of academic masterpieces,the lack of philosophy and social sciences masters and the insufficient transformation of application value make the"collective dilemma"a reality.Under the influence of the still obvious materialization incentives,the continuous strengthening of the merit-based competitive environment and the design of the production-oriented institution,the rational academic self-interest attribute of teachers has been increasingly activated and continuously strengthened.As a result,with the increasingly squeezed generation space of academic masterpieces,the growth process of philosophy and social sciences masters has been gradually hindered,and the significance of the transformation of the value of scientific research has also been increasingly obscured.Since the institution itself is the starting point of any collective action and shaping the mechanism at the micro level and the subsequent collective results,it has become an important breakthrough in the current reform of the evaluation of philosophy and social sciences research in colleges and universities to relieve the"collective dilemma"through institution.In view of the lack of academic masterpieces,the article proposes to optimize the current overly strong materialized incentive institution.In addition to the optimization of incentives in the material aspect,the institution should also be supported in the virtual aspect,so as to empower the academic masterpieces.In view of the current shortage of philosophy and social sciences masters,the article proposes to optimize the existing continuous merit competition institution.In addition to promoting the benign return of competition,the institution also needs to provide scientific research scaffolding for those teachers with certain scientific research development potential to help the growth of potential philosophy and social sciences masters.In view of the insufficient transformation of the current scientific research application value,the article proposes that the current performance-oriented evaluation institution should be optimized.In addition to further enriching the value transformation of scientific research resources into the teaching field internally,it is also necessary to externally highlight the translator status of teachers to increase efficiency of scientific research production.
陈允龙;崔玉平
山东师范大学 教育学部,山东 济南 250014||长江师范学院 教师教育学院,重庆 408100苏州大学 教育学院,江苏 苏州 215123
社会科学
新质生产力哲学社会科学科研评价中国特色哲学社会科学评价体系评价制度集体困境
new quality productive forcesphilosophy and social sciencesscientific research evaluationevaluation system of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristicsevaluation institutioncollective dilemma
《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (3)
127-140,14
重庆市社会科学规划青年项目"'破唯'背景下高校教师科研评价制度的优化策略研究"(2021NDQN78)重庆市教育科学"十四五"规划2023年度重点课题"教育现代化视野下高校学术评价体系重构研究"(K23YD2140083)2024年重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学研究一般项目"教育强国背景下高校科技激励机制研究"(24SKGH280)重庆市高等教育学会2023-2024年度高等教育科学研究课题"教育-科技-人才'三位一体'背景下高校教师评价改革研究"(cqgj23108C)
评论