首页|期刊导航|表面技术|赤泥和柠檬酸盐对硫铝酸盐水泥中钢筋耐腐蚀行为研究

赤泥和柠檬酸盐对硫铝酸盐水泥中钢筋耐腐蚀行为研究OA

Corrosion Resistance of Steel Bars in Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cement with Red Mud and Citrate

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 赤泥(Red mud,RM)作为氧化铝工业典型的大宗固体废弃物,而柠檬酸钠(Sodium citrate,SC)兼具缓凝与缓蚀功能,本研究重点探究 RM和 SC对含氯不同硫铝酸盐水泥(Calcium sulfoaluminate cement,CSA)孔溶液中钢筋的耐腐蚀行为.方法 采用非原位浸出法制备不同类型 CSA孔溶液,通过电感耦合等离子体发射光谱和离子色谱测定溶液中主要离子的类型与浓度;利用开路电位技术原位评估钢筋在溶液中的临界氯离子浓度(Ccr);采用静态失重实验定量评价钢筋的腐蚀速率(CR);通过电化学阻抗谱研究钢筋在溶液中的电化学响应机制;结合光学显微镜、扫描电子显微镜、原子力显微镜和 X 射线光电子能谱,揭示含氯不同 CSA 溶液中钢筋的耐腐蚀机理.结果 相较于 CSA 组溶液,掺入 RM的 CSA(CSA-RM)以及同时掺入 RM和 SC的 CSA(CSA-RM-SC)组溶液中SO42-、K+、Na+和 Ca2+的浓度均有所提高(尤以 CSA-RM组最为显著).CSA溶液中钢筋的 Ccr 约为0.04 mmol/L(锈层厚度略高于 10 nm),而 CSA-RM 组(锈层厚度介于 7~10 nm)和 CSA-RM-SC 组(锈层厚度约为 3 nm)溶液中钢筋的 Ccr 分别为 0.08 mmol/L 和0.18 mmol/L;相应 CR分别为 0.492、0.363 和 0.296 mm/a.结论 RM 的掺入提高了溶液的碱度和硫酸根离子浓度,增强了 OH-与硫酸根离子在钢筋表面的竞争吸附能力,从而削弱了氯盐对 CSA-RM 溶液中钢筋的去极化作用;而 SC中的柠檬酸根离子与金属离子结合形成螯合物,显著提升了 CSA-RM-SC溶液中钢筋抵抗氯盐侵蚀的性能.

Red mud(RM),a typical bulk industrial solid waste from alumina production,poses risks of soil alkalization and heavy metal pollution through traditional disposal methods.Utilizing it as a cement supplementary material or partial raw material substitute can significantly reduce stockpiling needs and achieve waste valorization.Thus,the combination of calcium sulfoaluminate cement(CSA)and RM accomplishes multiple objectives:cost reduction,solid waste consumption,and environmental emission mitigation,representing a potential breakthrough for green transformation in the construction materials industry.The application scenarios for cement-based materials are diverse and complex.However,the rapid hydration and setting of CSA cement often fail to meet the varied demands of practical engineering,making the dynamic regulation of CSA concrete hydration and setting particularly important.Sodium citrate(SC),as a retarder,offers a promising solution to this industry challenge.Compared with ordinary Portland cement(OPC),CSA hydration products are primarily ettringite and aluminum gel,without significant formation of Ca(OH)2,typically resulting in a lower pore solution pH.This makes steel bars more susceptible to chloride-induced corrosion.The coupled use of RM and SC provides a potential remedy:RM contains sodium aluminosilicate minerals that slowly hydrolyze to release alkaline species,thereby increasing the pore solution pH;meanwhile,SC functions not only as a retarder but also as a corrosion inhibitor.This synergy provides a theoretical basis for enhancing the corrosion resistance of steel in CSA systems.Nevertheless,existing studies on the time-dependent corrosion performance of steel in RM-CSA(CSA cement-based material mixed with RM)systems are limited,and the influence of SC addition on corrosion behavior remains unclear. This study comprehensively investigated the corrosion behavior of steel in CSA systems modified with SC and RM.The corrosion electrochemical response and mechanisms were studied by electrochemical analysis.Static weight loss tests,along with scanning electron microscopy,atomic force microscopy,and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy,were employed for qualitative and quantitative analysis of corrosion rate,post-corrosion morphology,and composition,aiming to elucidate the enhancement mechanisms of SC and RM on the corrosion resistance of steel in CSA cement,and provide a theoretical basis for anti-corrosion strategies in practical engineering applications of CSA concrete. The results showed that compared with the plain CSA solution,the concentrations of SO42-,K+,Na+,and Ca2+increased in both the CSA-RM and CSA-RM-SC(CSA cement-based material mixed with SC and RM)solutions(especially in the CSA-RM group),while the concentrations of Si and Al decreased.The critical chloride concentration(Ccr)for steel in the CSA solution was 0.04 mmol/L,whereas the values for the CSA-RM and CSA-RM-SC groups were 0.08 mmol/L and 0.18 mmol/L,respectively.The corresponding corrosion rates(CR)were 0.492 mm·a-1,0.363 mm·a-1,and 0.296 mm·a-1.Electrochemical studies indicated that the CSA-RM-SC group exhibited the smallest decrease in Rs,Rox,and Rct values(indicating superior resistance to chloride attack).After 7 days of corrosion,these values were 19.21 Ω·cm2,53.14 kΩ·cm2,and 59.97 kΩ·cm2,respectively.In contrast,the plain CSA group showed the largest decrease,with final values of 10.33 Ω·cm2,22.45 kΩ·cm2,and 35.14 kΩ·cm2,indicating the most severe steel corrosion.The corrosion products on steel in the chloride-containing CSA solution appeared as extensive,contiguous patches of dark yellow rust,with significant corrosion severity and depth(the thickness of the rust layer was slightly higher than 10 nm).In comparison,steel in the CSA-RM-SC solution showed the mildest corrosion,with only localized pitting observed on the surface(the thickness of the rust layer was about 3 nm). The corrosion resistance of steel bars in the CSA-RM solution was improved compared with the plain CSA solution(the thickness of the rust layer was between 7-10 nm).This was attributed to the incorporation of RM,which increased the solution alkalinity and sulfate ion concentration,enhancing the competitive adsorption of OH-and SO42-ions on the steel surface and thereby weakening the depolarization effect of chloride ions.Meanwhile,citrate ions from SC formed chelates with metals such as Fe and Al(e.g.,Fe-Cit and Al-Cit).These chelates adsorbed and precipitated on the steel surface during the passivation stage.Under the coordinated action of RM and SC,the chloride resistance of steel in the CSA-RM-SC solution was significantly enhanced.

郭向柯;李乐臣;周新显;李克亮;刘焕强;李伟华

华北水利水电大学 土木与交通学院,郑州 450045||华北水利水电大学 河南省基础设施腐蚀防控重点实验室,郑州 450045华北水利水电大学 土木与交通学院,郑州 450045||华北水利水电大学 河南省基础设施腐蚀防控重点实验室,郑州 450045华北水利水电大学 土木与交通学院,郑州 450045||华北水利水电大学 河南省基础设施腐蚀防控重点实验室,郑州 450045华北水利水电大学 土木与交通学院,郑州 450045||华北水利水电大学 河南省基础设施腐蚀防控重点实验室,郑州 450045华北水利水电大学 土木与交通学院,郑州 450045||华北水利水电大学 河南省基础设施腐蚀防控重点实验室,郑州 450045华北水利水电大学 土木与交通学院,郑州 450045||华北水利水电大学 河南省基础设施腐蚀防控重点实验室,郑州 450045||河南省科学院 化学研究所,郑州 450046

矿业与冶金

赤泥柠檬酸盐硫铝酸盐水泥低碳钢筋耐腐蚀性

red mudcitratecalcium sulfoaluminate cementmild steel barscorrosion resistance

《表面技术》 2026 (18)

26-37,12

国家自然科学基金(52408258,52271355)河南省科技厅科技攻关项目(262102321160,262102321150)河南省基础设施腐蚀防控重点实验室开放基金(HNICP 202410)河南省深地材料科学与技术重点实验室开放基金(MDE2025-01) Natural Science Foundation of China(52408258,52271355)Henan Province Science and Technology Research Project(262102321160,262102321150)Henan Key Laboratory of Infrastructure Corrosion and Protection(HNICP 202410)Henan Key Laboratory of Materials on Deep-Earth Engineering(Henan Polytechnic University)(MDE2025-01)

10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2026.18.003

评论