城市更新中的集体行动困境及其治理机制OACHSSCD
The Collective Action Dilemma in Urban Renewal and Its Governance Mechanisms:An Analysis Based on the Context-Mechanism Framework
城市更新中的老旧小区电梯加装成为回应居民需求的关键举措.但在多元利益冲突与协商成本高企的局面下,该举措在推进中频遭集体行动困境.为探析此现象的形成逻辑,并寻求不同社区中集体行动困境的破解机制,基于豫北Z市四个案例社区的田野调查,通过构建"情境-机制"框架,分析不同治理机制在集体行动中的作用方式.研究发现,集体行动困境的破解取决于治理机制与社区情境的适配度:协同稳定型社区需权威动员机制来整合资源,规制外援型社区需引入经济契约机制来填补信任缺口,内生合作型社区需人情共识机制驱动,而松散薄弱型社区则需诉诸程序协商机制来重构信任.不仅拓展了集体行动理论的本土化解释,也为中国基层治理提供了差异化、精准化的分类施策路径.
The installation of elevators in old residential communities has become an important policy responding to residents'needs in the context of urban renewal.However,amid multiple interest conflicts and high costs of negotiation,this initiative has often encountered collective action dilemmas in its implementation.This article seeks to examine the underlying logic of this phenomenon and to identify the mechanisms through which collective action dilemmas can be addressed across different communities.Based on fieldwork conducted in four community cases in City Z of northern Henan,this article constructs a"context-mechanism"analytical framework to examine how different governance mechanisms operate in processes of collective action.Research has found that solving the collective action dilemma depends on the fit between governance mechanisms and community context.Collaborative and stable communities need authoritative mobilization mechanisms to integrate resources;regulated exogenous communities require economic contract mechanisms to fill trust gaps;endogenous cooperative communities require the impetus of a"interpersonal consensus"mechanism,while loose and weak communities need to resort to procedural negotiation mechanisms to rebuild trust.This study not only expands the localized interpretation of collective action theory,but also provides differentiated and precise policy implementation paths for grassroots governance in China.
毛哲山
河南师范大学 政治与公共管理学院,河南 新乡 453007
社会科学
城市更新集体行动田野调查分类施策治理机制
urban renewalcollective actionfieldworktargeted measuresgovernance mechanisms
《北京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (5)
68-78,11
国家社会科学基金一般项目(25BSH070)
评论