经皮椎体成形术不同骨水泥注入方式在老年腰椎压缩性骨折中的疗效与安全性对比OA
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Different Bone Cement Injection Methods in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty of Elderly Lumbar Compression Fractures
目的:对比经皮椎体成形术(PVP)中常规注入、加压注入、分次注入三种骨水泥注入方式在老年腰椎压缩性骨折中的疗效与安全性.方法:回顾性选取 2022 年 8 月—2024 年 8 月上饶市立医院收治的 90 例老年腰椎压缩性骨折患者,根据治疗方式将患者分为三组:常规注入组(n=30,常规注入骨水泥)、加压注入组(n=30,加压注入骨水泥)、分次注入组(n=30,分次注入骨水泥),均行PVP.比较三组椎体高度、疼痛情况、骨水泥分布、填充率及注入量,以及安全性.结果:与常规注入组和分次注入组相比,加压注入组术后 1 周的 VAS 评分低(P<0.05);三组术后 1、3 个月的 VAS 评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).术后 1 个月,加压注入组椎体前缘和中部高度高于常规注入组和分次注入组(P<0.05);术后 1 个月,三组椎体后缘高度比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).三组骨水泥弥散分型比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);加压注入组骨水泥足量填充率高于常规注入组和分次注入组(P<0.05);加压注入组骨水泥注入量较常规注入组和分次注入组多(P<0.05).分次注入组的并发症发生率低于常规注入组(P<0.05).结论:加压注入骨水泥在椎体前缘、中部高度恢复和早期止痛方面效果更佳,分次注入骨水泥在提高安全性方面表现最优.
Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of three bone cement injection methods in percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP):conventional injection,pressurized injection,and staged injection in elderly lumbar compression fractures.Method:A retrospective selection was made of 90 elderly patients with lumbar compression fractures in Shangrao Municipal Hospital from August 2022 to August 2024.According to the treatment methods,the patients were divided into three groups:conventional injection group(n=30,conventional injection of bone cement),pressurized injection group(n=30,pressurized injection of bone cement),and staged injection group(n=30,staged injection of bone cement).All of them underwent PVP.The vertebral height,pain condition,the distribution,filling rate and injection volume of bone cement,and the safety among the three groups were compared.Result:Compared with the conventional injection group and the staged injection group,the VAS score in the pressurized injection group was lower one week after operation(P<0.05).The comparison of VAS scores of the three groups 1 and 3 months after operation showed no statistically significant differences(P>0.05).One month after operation,the anterior edge and middle heights of the vertebrae in the pressurized injection group were higher than those in the conventional injection group and the staged injection group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the posterior edge height of the vertebrae 1 month after operation among the three groups(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in bone cement diffusion classification among the three groups(P>0.05).The bone cement sufficient filling rate in the pressurized injection group was higher than that in the conventional injection group and the staged injection group(P<0.05).The bone cement injection volume in the pressurized injection group was greater than that in the conventional injection group and the staged injection group(P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the staged injection group was lower than that in the conventional injection group(P<0.05).Conclusion:Pressurized injection of bone cement is more effective in recovering the anterior edge and middle heights of the vertebrae and relieving early pain,and staged injection of bone cement is the best in improving safety.
张跃林;周丽媛;陶乾远
上饶市立医院骨外科 江西 上饶 334000上饶市立医院骨外科 江西 上饶 334000上饶市立医院骨外科 江西 上饶 334000
医药卫生
经皮椎体成形术骨水泥注入方式老年腰椎压缩性骨折安全性
Percutaneous vertebroplastyBone cement injection methodsElderly lumbar compression fractureSafety
《中国医学创新》 2026 (22)
6-10,5
上饶市指导性科技计划项目(20251CZDX32)
评论