基于BI-RADS分级与可疑超声征象的综合评判规则对乳腺肿块良恶性的诊断效能OA
Diagnostic Performance of an Integrated Assessment Rule Based on BI-RADS Categories and Suspicious Ultrasound Features for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses
目的 评估基于乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)分级与可疑超声特征的综合评判规则在乳腺良恶性肿块鉴别诊断中的应用价值.方法 回顾性选取 2024 年 1 月至 2025 年 12 月郑州市第三人民医院收治的 72 例乳腺肿块患者(共 72 个病灶)为研究对象.所有患者在病理取材前均接受常规超声检查,记录肿块形态、边界、内部回声、钙化、后方回声及方向特征,并依据美国放射学会(ACR)BI-RADS 超声词典(2025 年发布,第 6 版)完成分级.以术后病理或穿刺活检结果为金标准,计算常规超声单独(BI-RADS分级≥4类)及综合评判诊断乳腺恶性肿块的灵敏度、特异度、准确率、阳性预测值及阴性预测值.结果 72个病灶中,病理证实恶性病灶34个(47.22%),良性病灶38个(52.78%).恶性组形态不规则、边界不清晰、内部低回声、微小钙化及后方回声衰减的比例均高于良性组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).以 BI-RADS 4 类及以上为恶性判断标准,常规超声单独诊断的灵敏度、特异度、准确率、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为 79.41%(27/34)、84.21%(32/38)、81.94%(59/72)、81.82%(27/33)、82.05%(32/39);综合评判诊断的上述指标分别为 91.18%(31/34)、89.47%(34/38)、90.28%(65/72)、88.57%(31/35)、91.89%(34/37),综合评判准确率较常规超声提高 8.34 个百分点(配对精确 McNemar 检验P=0.031).结论 在本研究样本中,基于 BI-RADS 分级与可疑超声征象的规则化重分类综合评判较常规超声单独判断提高了乳腺肿块良恶性鉴别的总体准确率,灵敏度和特异度的点估计亦有所提高,可作为常规超声评估的补充.鉴于本研究为单中心回顾性小样本研究,该规则不能替代组织学诊断,其临床适用性尚需经规范分层、盲法阅片及外部验证进一步确认.
Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of an integrated assessment rule based on Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System(BI-RADS)categories and suspicious ultrasound features for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses.Methods A total of 72 patients with breast masses,comprising 72 lesions,who were treated at Zhengzhou Third People's Hospital from January 2024 to December 2025 were retrospectively included.Patients underwent conventional ultrasonography before pathological sampling.Lesion morphology,margins,internal echogenicity,calcifications,posterior acoustic features,and orientation were recorded,and lesions were categorized according to the American College of Radiology(ACR)BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon,6th edition,released in 2025.Postoperative pathology or core needle biopsy findings were used as the reference standard.The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value,and negative predictive value for diagnosing malignant breast masses were calculated for conventional ultrasonography alone,using BI-RADS category 4 or higher as the threshold for malignancy,and for the integrated assessment rule.Results Among the 72 lesions,34(47.22%)were pathologically confirmed as malignant and 38(52.78%)as benign.The proportions of irregular morphology,indistinct margins,hypoechogenicity,microcalcifications,and posterior acoustic shadowing were higher in malignant lesions than in benign lesions,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).Using BI-RADS category 4 or higher as the threshold for malignancy,conventional ultrasonography alone yielded a sensitivity of 79.41%(27/34),specificity of 84.21%(32/38),accuracy of 81.94%(59/72),positive predictive value of 81.82%(27/33),and negative predictive value of 82.05%(32/39).The corresponding values for the integrated assessment were 91.18%(31/34),89.47%(34/38),90.28%(65/72),88.57%(31/35),and 91.89%(34/37),respectively.The integrated assessment improved overall diagnostic accuracy by 8.34 percentage points compared with conventional ultrasonography alone(paired exact McNemar test,P=0.031).Conclusion In this study sample,a rule-based integrated assessment incorporating BI-RADS categories and suspicious ultrasound features improved the overall accuracy of differentiating benign and malignant breast masses compared with conventional ultrasonography alone,with higher point estimates for both sensitivity and specificity.This approach may serve as a supplementary tool to routine ultrasound assessment.However,given the single-center,retrospective design and small sample size,the rule cannot replace histopathological diagnosis,and its clinical applicability requires further confirmation through standardized stratification,blinded image interpretation,and external validation.
常漪潇;路静
郑州市第三人民医院 超声医学科,河南 郑州 450000郑州市第三人民医院 超声医学科,河南 郑州 450000
常规超声乳腺肿块良恶性诊断效能
conventional ultrasonographybreastmassbenign and malignantdiagnostic performance
《临床研究》 2026 (9)
150-153,4
评论