通道下后侧入路MIS-TLIF改良术式治疗退行性腰椎椎管狭窄症:椎旁肌保护及近期临床疗效研究OA
Modified Channel-Assisted Posterior MIS-TLIF for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis:Paraspinal Muscle Preservation and Short-Term Clinical Outcomes
目的 比较改良通道辅助下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF)与传统开放 TLIF(O-TLIF)治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症(DLSS)的临床效果及对椎旁肌的保护作用.方法 回顾性纳入 2023 年 1 月至 2025 年 6 月于南阳豫西健和医院行手术治疗的82例单节段DLSS患者,分为观察组(改良MIS-TLIF,42例)与对照组(O-TLIF,40例),随访时间 6~12 个月(中位随访 9 个月).比较两组围术期指标、血清肌酸激酶(CK)、多裂肌(MF)与竖脊肌(ES)的功能性横截面积(FCSA)及脂肪浸润比率(FIR)、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)及末次随访时融合率.结果 观察组失血量、引流量均少于对照组,下地时间、住院天数均短于对照组,术后 6 个月及末次随访 MF FCSA、ES FCSA 均大于对照组,MF FIR、ES FIR 均小于对照组,术后 24 h 血清 CK 低于对照组,术后 1 周、3 个月、6 个月腰部疼痛 VAS 评分均低于对照组,术后 1 周、3 个月、6 个月 ODI 评分均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).重复测量方差分析显示,MF FCSA、MF FIR、ES FCSA、ES FIR、腰部疼痛 VAS 评分及 ODI 评分的组间效应、时间效应及交互效应差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).两组手术时间、各时间点腿部疼痛 VAS 评分、末次随访腰部疼痛 VAS 评分、末次随访 ODI 评分、末次随访融合率、并发症总发生率及手术满意率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 改良 MIS-TLIF 可减少手术创伤,保护椎旁肌结构及功能,促进早期康复.
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and paraspinal muscle-preserving effects of modified channel-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(MIS-TLIF)with conventional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(O-TLIF)in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis(DLSS).Methods A total of 82 patients with single-level DLSS who underwent surgical treatment at Nanyang West Henan Jianhe Hospital from January 2023 to June 2025 were retrospectively included.The patients were divided into an observation group(modified MIS-TLIF,n=42)and a control group(O-TLIF,n=40).Follow-up ranged from 6 to 12 months,with a median duration of 9 months.Perioperative indicators,serum creatine kinase(CK),functional cross-sectional area(FCSA)and fat infiltration ratio(FIR)of the multifidus(MF)and erector spinae(ES),visual analog scale(VAS)pain scores,Oswestry Disability Index(ODI),and fusion rate at the final follow-up were compared between the two groups.Results The observation group had less intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage and shorter time to ambulation and hospital stay than the control group.At 6 months after surgery and at the final follow-up,MF FCSA and ES FCSA were greater,whereas MF FIR and ES FIR were lower,in the observation group than in the control group.Serum CK at 24 h after surgery was lower in the observation group.Low-back pain VAS scores at 1 week,3 months,and 6 months after surgery and ODI scores at 1 week,3 months,and 6 months were also lower in the observation group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).Repeated-measures analysis of variance showed significant group,time,and group-by-time interaction effects for MF FCSA,MF FIR,ES FCSA,ES FIR,low-back pain VAS scores,and ODI scores(P<0.05).No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in operative time,leg pain VAS scores at any time point,low-back pain VAS score at the final follow-up,ODI score at the final follow-up,fusion rate at the final follow-up,overall complication rate,or surgical satisfaction rate(P>0.05).Conclusion Modified MIS-TLIF can reduce surgical trauma,preserve the structure and function of the paraspinal muscles,and promote early postoperative recovery in patients with DLSS.
李正法;康闯
南阳豫西健和医院 脊柱骨关节外科,河南 南阳 474500南阳豫西健和医院 脊柱骨关节外科,河南 南阳 474500
退行性腰椎管狭窄症微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术椎旁肌群多裂肌功能性横截面积
degenerative lumbar spinal stenosisminimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusionparaspinal musclesmultifidusfunctional cross-sectional area
《临床研究》 2026 (9)
74-78,5
评论