首页|期刊导航|林业科学|实测与有限元法分析节子对木材顺纹抗压性能的影响

实测与有限元法分析节子对木材顺纹抗压性能的影响OA

Effects of Knots Measured and Analyzed by Finite Element Method on Longitudinal Compression Performance of Wood

中文摘要英文摘要

[目的]探究节子对红松和长白落叶松木材顺纹抗压强度的影响规律,并建立预测模型,为木结构安全设计提供理论依据.[方法]顺纹抗压试样尺寸为 40 mm(径向)×40 mm(弦向)×100 mm(长度),尽量将尺寸最大的节子置于试样中间.依据 GB/T 29897-2013测量节子尺寸和体积比,参照 GB/T 28993-2012开展顺纹抗压试验,根据 ASTM D143-25记录试样的破坏类型;基于实际试样尺寸的二分之一对称模型进行有限元模拟,含死节试样采用表面-表面硬接触以模拟界面分离和滑移,含活节试样采用共节点连接以反映纤维连续性;应用流线理论模拟节子周围木材纤维的复杂偏转行为,预测含节试样的顺纹抗压强度.[结果]1)红松有节材试样(均为单节活节)平均顺纹抗压强度为 20.49±4.69 MPa,较无节材(26.84±4.82 MPa)降低 23.66%;长白落叶松有节材试样(均为单节活节)平均顺纹抗压强度为 30.68±5.82 MPa,较无节材(41.58±8.29 MPa)降低 26.21%.在破坏类型方面,无节材均以Ⅲ型和Ⅵ型破坏为主;有节材则以Ⅲ型破坏为主,并出现Ⅲ与Ⅵ型混合破坏类型.2)红松有节材试样中,节子尺寸实测范围为 0.10~33.00 mm,分为 3个等级,分别为 T1(0.10~4.00 mm)、T2(4.00~10.00 mm)和 T3(10.00~33.00 mm),每个等级平均顺纹抗压强度分别为 22.39、20.86和 17.87 MPa,T3组与 T1和 T2组之间存在显著性差异(P1,3<0.001,P2,3=0.021<0.05).长白落叶松有节材试样中,节子尺寸实测范围为 0.18~18.75 mm,分为 3个等级,分别为 T4(0.18~4.00 mm)、T5(4.00~10.00 mm)和 T6(10.00~18.75 mm),每个等级平均顺纹抗压强度分别为 35.35、28.59和 26.22 MPa,T4组与 T5和 T6组之间存在显著性差异(P4,5=0.001<0.05,P4,6<0.001).节子体积比对顺纹抗压强度的影响规律与节子尺寸的影响规律呈现一致性.3)红松和长白落叶松试样节子附近纹理偏转角度与顺纹抗压强度的决定系数(R2)分别为 0.823 99和 0.830 56,线性拟合方程斜率分别为-0.263 34和-0.345 01.4)在预测模型中,含死节试样的破坏类型表现为沿死节与基材之间界面发生开裂,且随着死节附近纹理偏转角度增加,裂纹逐渐偏离顺纹方向;含活节试样的破坏类型取决于活节与基材之间弹性模量(MOE)差异.[结论]节子的存在显著降低红松和长白落叶松木材顺纹抗压强度,且出现混合破坏类型.节子尺寸和体积比增大会降低木材顺纹抗压强度,其中长白落叶松木材顺纹抗压强度呈现出更大的下降趋势.红松和长白落叶松木材节子附近纹理偏转角度与顺纹抗压强度均呈负相关,长白落叶松木材顺纹抗压强度随着节子附近纹理偏转角度增加而降低的幅度更为显著.死节和活节导致木材破坏机制不同,含死节试样的破坏主要发生在死节与基材之间界面,且裂纹方向受纹理偏转影响;含活节试样的破坏类型取决于活节与基材之间弹性模量相对大小.

[Objective]This study aims to explore the influence patterns of knots on the longitudinal compressive strength of Pinus koraiensis and Larix olgensis,and establish a predictive model,so as to provide a theoretical basis for the safety design of timber structures.[Method]The size of the longitudinal compressive strength specimens was 40 mm(radial)×40 mm(tangential)×100 mm(longitudinal),with the largest knot positioned in the middle of the specimen as much as possible.Knot size and volume ratios were measured in accordance with GB/T 29897-2013.Longitudinal compression tests were performed following GB/T 28993-2012,and specimen failure modes were recorded according to ASTM D143-25.Based on the actual specimen size,a half symmetrical model was used for finite element simulation.The specimens with dead knots were subjected to surface-to-surface hard contact to simulate interface separation and slippage,while the specimen with live knots was subjected to shared-node connections to reflect fiber continuity.The stream line approach was used to simulate the complex deflection behavior of wood fibers around knots and predict the longitudinal compressive strength.[Result]1)The average longitudinal compressive strength of Pinus koraiensis specimens with knots(all single live knots)was 20.49±4.69 MPa,which was 23.66%lower than that of the specimens without knots(26.84±4.82 MPa).The average longitudinal compressive strength of Larix olgensis specimens with knots(all single live knots)was 30.68±5.82 MPa,which was 26.21%lower than that of the specimens without knots(41.58±8.29 MPa).In terms of failure types,knot-free wood predominantly exhibited type Ⅲ and type Ⅵ failures,while knotted wood mainly showed type Ⅲ failures,along with mixed failure types combining type Ⅲ and type Ⅵ.2)In Pinus koraiensis specimens with knots,the measured knot sizes ranged from 0.10 to 33.00 mm,divided into three grades:T1(0.10-4.00 mm),T2(4.00-10.00 mm),T3(10.00-33.00 mm).The average longitudinal compressive strengths were 22.39,20.86,and 17.87 MPa,respectively.There were significant differences in the longitudinal compressive strengths between T3 and both T1 and T2(P1,3<0.001,P2,3=0.021<0.05).In knotty Larix olgensis specimens,the measured knot sizes ranged from 0.18 to 18.75 mm,divided into three grades:T4(0.18-4.00 mm),T5(4.00-10.00 mm),T6(10.00-18.75 mm),with average strengths of 35.35,28.59,and 26.22 MPa,respectively.There were significant differences in the longitudinal compressive strengths between T4 and both T5 and T6(P4,5=0.001<0.05,P4,6<0.001).The influence of knot volume ratios on longitudinal compressive strength followed the same trend as knot size.3)The coefficient of determination(R2)between the grain deflection angle near knots and the longitudinal compressive strength was 0.823 99 for P.koraiensis and 0.830 56 for L.olgensis.The slopes of the linear regression equations were-0.263 34 and-0.345 01,respectively.4)In the predictive model,the failure type of specimens containing dead knots was manifested as cracking along the knot-matrix interface,and as the grain deflection angle near dead knots increased,the crack gradually deviated from the straight-grain direction.the failure type of specimens containing live knots depended on the modulus of elasticity(MOE)difference between knot and the wood matrix.[Conclusion]The presence of knots significantly reduces the longitudinal compressive strength of both P.koraiensis and L.olgensis and leads to mixed failure modes.The increase in the knot size and volume ratio reduces longitudinal compressive strength,with L.olgensis exhibiting a more pronounced decline.Fiber deflection angle near knots shows a negative correlation with longitudinal compressive strength for both species.The longitudinal compressive strength of L.olgensis decreases more significantly as the grain deflection angle near knots increases.The failure mechanisms induced by dead knots and live knots are distinct.In specimens with dead knots,failure primarily occurs at the interface between the dead knot and the wood matrix,and the crack direction is influenced by grain deflection.In specimens with live knots,the failure mode depends on the relative magnitude of the MOE between the live knot and the wood matrix.

陈瑞瑶;王钱晴;郝文静;蒋宇萌;董利虎;苗铮;江京辉

中国林业科学研究院木材工业研究所 北京 100091中国林业科学研究院木材工业研究所 北京 100091中国林业科学研究院木材工业研究所 北京 100091东北林业大学 哈尔滨 150040东北林业大学 哈尔滨 150040东北林业大学 哈尔滨 150040中国林业科学研究院木材工业研究所 北京 100091

农业科技

节子顺纹抗压强度破坏类型实测法有限元分析法

knotlongitudinal compressive strengthtype of failureexperimental methodfinite element method

《林业科学》 2026 (9)

187-197,11

国家重点研发计划青年科学家项目(2022YFD2201800).

10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20250726

评论