轮班类型、体力劳动强度及其联合作用与2型糖尿病关联的队列研究OA
A cohort study of shift work type,physical labor intensity,and their joint association with type 2 diabetes
[背景]伴随经济全球化的深入推进,轮班工作制在诸多行业中日益普及,其与 2型糖尿病(T2DM)的关联性也随之成为学界关注的焦点. [目的]本研究通过石油工人职业健康人群队列研究,探究不同轮班类型、体力劳动强度与T2DM 发病的关联,以及两者的联合作用对 T2DM发病风险的影响,为降低从事轮班作业和体力劳动的工人T2DM风险提供科学依据. [方法]本队列研究以 2013-2015年在新疆克拉玛依中心医院接受职业健康体检的石油石化作业人群为研究对象,采用分层抽样的方法,选取年龄在 20~60岁且在岗满 1年的员工为研究人群,共 3 720人进行了基线问卷调查和健康体检.于 2023年对研究对象进行随访.糖尿病诊断依据2020年《中国2型糖尿病防治指南》.轮班分为固定白班、两班倒、三班两倒、四班三倒和其他类型轮班.体力劳动强度依据 SY/T6358-2008《石油野外作业体力劳动强度分级》分为"轻、中、重、极重"4个等级.采用泊松回归模型校正多种混杂因素后,分析轮班类型、体力劳动强度以及两者的联合作用T2DM的关联性. [结果]共 3 473名研究对象完成随访.多因素泊松回归分析显示,不同轮班类型与 T2DM发病风险相关,校正混杂因素后,两班倒、三班两倒、四班三倒、其他类型轮班工人 T2DM发病风险分别是固定白班工人的 2.17(95%CI:1.44~3.27)、1.86(95%CI:1.16~2.97)、1.85(95%CI:1.17~2.93)和 2.15(95%CI:1.20~3.88)倍.不同体力劳动强度组的 T2DM发病风险存在差异,极重度风险最高(RR=2.26,95%CI:1.44~3.56),其次为重度(RR=1.91,95%CI:1.29~2.82).固定白班重度(RR=2.38,95%CI:1.16~4.72)、极重度(RR=2.64,95%CI:1.13~5.82)组;两班倒轻度(RR=2.71,95%CI:1.11~6.14)、中度(RR=3.38,95%CI:1.43~7.34)、重度(RR=3.61,95%CI:1.52~7.84)、极重度(RR=4.93,95%CI:1.87~11.12)组;三班两倒轻度(RR=2.75,95%CI:1.14~6.19)、中度(RR=3.08,95%CI:1.14~7.51)、重度及极重度(RR=4.06,95%CI:1.77~8.50)组;四班三倒重度及极重度(RR=3.89,95%CI:1.78~7.84)组;其他类型倒班轮班重度及极重度(RR=4.57,95%CI:1.55~11.30)组的T2DM发病风险仍高于对照组. [结论]两班倒、三班两倒、四班三倒、其他类型轮班均会增加 T2DM的发病风险,而且叠加体力劳动强度会进一步升高风险.建议对高风险人群实施定期血糖监测与针对性健康干预.
[Background]Shift work is increasingly common in modern industries as economic globalization continues to advance,and has been associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM). [Objective]To investigate the independent and interactive effects of shift work types and physical labor intensity on the risk of T2DM within an occupational cohort of petroleum workers,aiming to provide a scientific basis for reducing the risk of T2DM among workers engaged in shift work and physical labor. [Methods]This cohort study enrolled petroleum workers who underwent occupational health examinations at Karamay Central Hospital in Xinjiang from 2013 to 2015.Using stratified sampling,employees aged 20-60 years who had been actively employed and had been working in their current positions for at least one year were selected.A total of 3 720 participants completed the baseline questionnaire survey and health examination,and follow-up was conducted in 2023.T2DM was diagnosed according to the 2020 Chinese Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes.Shift work type was categorized into fixed day shift,two-shift rotation,three-team two-shift rotation,four-team three-shift rotation,and other shift schedules.Physical labor intensity was classified as light,moderate,heavy,and extremely heavy according to the Classification of Physical Labor Intensity for Petroleum Field Operations(SY/T 6358-2008).Poisson regression models were used to estimate the associations of shift work type,physical labor intensity,and their joint exposure categories with T2DM risk after adjustment for potential confounders. [Results]A total of 3 473 participants completed follow-up.Poisson regression analysis showed that shift work type was associated with T2DM risk.After adjustment for confounders,compared with fixed day shift workers,those engaged in two-shift rotation,three-team two-shift rotation,four-team three-shift rotation,and other shift schedules had higher risks of T2DM,with RRs of 2.17(95%CI:1.44,3.27),1.86(95%CI:1.16,2.97),1.85(95%CI:1.17,2.93),and 2.15(95%CI:1.20,3.88),respectively.T2DM risk also differed across physical labor intensity groups,with the extremely heavy group showing the highest risk(RR=2.26,95%CI:1.44,3.56),followed by the heavy group(RR=1.91,95%CI:1.29,2.82).Compared with workers exposed to fixed day shift+light intensity,increased T2DM risks were observed in those exposed to fixed day shift+heavy intensity(RR=2.38,95%CI:1.16,4.72)or extremely heavy intensity(RR=2.64,95%CI:1.13,5.82);two-shift rotation+light(RR=2.71,95%CI:1.11,6.14),moderate(RR=3.38,95%CI:1.43,7.34),heavy(RR=3.61,95%CI:1.52,7.84),or extremely heavy intensity(RR=4.93,95%CI:1.87,11.12);three-shift two-team rotation+light(RR=2.75,95%CI:1.14,6.19),moderate(RR=3.08,95%CI:1.14,7.51),or heavy/extremely heavy intensity(RR=4.06,95%CI:1.77,8.50);four-shift three-team rotation+heavy/ex-tremely heavy intensity(RR=3.89,95%CI:1.78,7.84);and other shift types+heavy/extremely heavy intensity(RR=4.57,95%CI:1.55,11.30). [Conclusion]This study demonstrates that various types of shift work significantly increase the risk of T2DM,and that concurrent exposure to high physical labor intensity exacerbates this risk.Regular blood glucose monitoring and targeted health interventions are recommended for workers exposed to rotating shift schedules and high physical work intensity.
陆海霞;林澜;黄常学;金钰欣;连玉龙
南通大学公共卫生学院,江苏 南通 226019南通大学公共卫生学院,江苏 南通 226019||新疆第二医学院,新疆 克拉玛依 834099南通大学公共卫生学院,江苏 南通 226019南通大学公共卫生学院,江苏 南通 226019南通大学公共卫生学院,江苏 南通 226019
医药卫生
轮班类型体力劳动强度队列研究2型糖尿病联合作用
shift typephysical labor intensitycohort studytype 2 diabetes mellitusjoint exposure effect
《环境与职业医学》 2026 (8)
936-943,8
江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20211331)
评论