首页|期刊导航|中医杂志|四种内迎香穴鼻内针刺取穴方法治疗变应性鼻炎患者的即刻疗效及安全性评价

四种内迎香穴鼻内针刺取穴方法治疗变应性鼻炎患者的即刻疗效及安全性评价OA

Evaluation of the Immediate Effectiveness and Safety of Four Intranasal Localization Methods of Neiyingxiang(EX-HN 9)Acupuncture for Allergic Rhinitis

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 评价四种内迎香穴鼻内针刺取穴方法改善变应性鼻炎(AR)患者鼻腔通气的即刻疗效及安全性.方法 将120例AR患者随机分为鼻丘组、下鼻甲-鼻翼交界组、下鼻甲顶部组和鼻中隔组,各30例.四组均接受单次鼻内针刺治疗,留针20 min.鼻丘组取鼻丘位置,下鼻甲-鼻翼交界组取下鼻甲与鼻翼软骨交界处,下鼻甲顶部组取正对应鼻孔的下鼻甲顶部,鼻中隔组取鼻中隔利特尔区.分别于针刺治疗开始前和治疗结束后5 min内,采用鼻阻塞症状评估(NOSE)量表评估针刺前后的鼻塞程度,使用鼻阻力/鼻流量检测仪检测针刺前后的鼻气道阻力(NAR)和鼻呼吸量(NS),采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛情况,记录鼻腔出血及其他不良反应发生情况,统计患者对再次接受治疗的意愿.结果 与本组治疗前相比,四组治疗后NOSE评分、NAR均下降,NS均升高(P<0.05).与鼻丘组和下鼻甲-鼻翼交界组比较,下鼻甲顶部组NOSE评分升高,NS降低,鼻中隔组NOSE评分、NAR升高,NS降低(P<0.05).鼻中隔组VAS评分高于其他三组(P<0.05),发生大量鼻出血11例(36.67%),其余各组未出现大量鼻出血.鼻丘组、下鼻甲-鼻翼交界组、下鼻甲顶部组、鼻中隔组患者愿意接受再次鼻内针刺治疗的占比分别为70.00%(21/30)、76.67%(23/30)、43.33%(13/30)、3.33%(1/30),差异有统计学意义(x2=39.91,P<0.001).结论 四种取穴方法均可即刻改善AR患者鼻腔通气,其中鼻丘组和下鼻甲-鼻翼组改善效果优于下鼻甲顶部组、鼻中隔组,且安全性和接受度较高.

Objective To evaluate the immediate effectiveness and safety of four intranasal acupuncture methods based on different intranasal localizations of Neiyingxiang(EX-HN 9)for improving nasal ventilation in patients with allergic rhinitis(AR).Methods A total of 120 patients with AR were randomly divided into four groups with 30 cases in each group,the agger nasi group,the inferior turbinate-alar junction group,the inferior turbinate top group,and the nasal septum group.All patients received one 20-minute session of intranasal acupuncture.The agger nasi group received acupuncture at the agger nasi site,the inferior turbinate-alar junction group at the junction of the infe-rior turbinate and alar cartilage,the inferior turbinate top group at the top of the inferior turbinate directly facing the nostril,and the nasal septum group at Little's area of the nasal septum.Before acupuncture and within 5 min after treat-ment,the assessments and measurements were performed including nasal obstruction symptom evaluation(NOSE)scale used to evaluate the severity of nasal obstruction before and after acupuncture,a nasal resistance/nasal flow analyzer applied to detect nasal airway resistance(NAR)and nasal respiration volume(NS),the visual analogue scale(VAS)adopted to assess pain intensity.The incidence of nasal bleeding and other adverse events were recorded,and patients' willingness to receive repeat treatment was statistically analyzed.Results Compared with baseline within group,all four groups showed decreased NOSE scores and NAR as well as elevated NS after treatment(all P<0.05).Compared with the agger nasi group and the inferior turbinate-alar junction group,the inferior turbinate top group had higher NOSE scores and lower NS;the nasal septum group presented higher NOSE scores and NAR along-side lower NS(P<0.05).The nasal septum group yielded significantly higher VAS scores than the other three groups(P<0.05),with 11 cases(36.67%)of massive nasal bleeding observed,while no severe nasal hemorrhage occurred in the remaining groups.The proportions of patients willing to receive repeated intranasal acupuncture treat-ment were 70.00%(21/30)in the agger nasi group,76.67%(23/30)in the inferior turbinate-alar junction group,43.33%(13/30)in the inferior turbinate top group,and 3.33%(1/30)in the nasal septum group,respectively,with statistical significant difference among groups(x2=39.91,P<0.001).Conclusion All four intranasal acupunc-ture methods can immediately improve nasal ventilation in patients with AR.The agger nasi group and inferior turbinate-alar cartilage junction group achieved superior therapeutic improvement compared with the inferior turbinate top group and nasal septum group,accompanied by better safety and higher patient acceptability.

丁小龙;徐哲;段汉忠

浙江中医药大学附属杭州市中医院,浙江省杭州市西湖区体育场路453号,310007浙江中医药大学附属杭州市中医院,浙江省杭州市西湖区体育场路453号,310007浙江中医药大学附属杭州市中医院,浙江省杭州市西湖区体育场路453号,310007

变应性鼻炎鼻内针刺内迎香穴鼻通气鼻出血

allergic rhinitisintranasal acupunctureNeiyingxiang(EX-HN 9)nasal ventilationnasal bleeding

《中医杂志》 2026 (15)

1634-1639,6

浙江省中医药科技计划项目(2024ZL642)

10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2026.15.010

评论