基于机器学习的MRI液氦水平预测研究OA
Prediction for MRI liquid Helium level on the basis of machine learning
目的:比较支持向量回归(SVR)、长短期记忆网络(LSTM)、门控循环单元(GRU)和Transformer模型对磁共振成像(MRI)设备液氦存量的递归多步预测效果,评估各模型在单设备、小样本时序数据中的适用性.方法:调取四川大学华西医院1台MRI设备2024年2月24日至5月29日的340条液氦存量记录,按6∶2∶2依次划分为训练集、验证集和测试集,分别为204、68和68条.利用历史液氦水平及时间间隔信息训练SVR、LSTM、GRU和Transformer模型,并在验证集和测试集上开展递归多步预测.采用决定系数(R2)、均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)、平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)及残差标准差评价递归预测性能.结果:测试集上,SVR的R2为0.976,RMSE、MAE和残差标准差分别为0.56、0.47和0.56,MAPE为0.89%,综合表现最佳;GRU的各项预测指标与SVR相近.验证集上,LSTM的综合误差最低.结论:在本研究单台设备、小样本数据条件下,SVR在测试集上展现出最高的预测精度,但各模型的拟合优势在验证集与测试集等不同数据阶段存在显著波动.模型的稳定性和外部适用性仍需通过多设备、多补液周期及前瞻性数据进一步验证.
Objective:To compare recursive multi-step predictive effects of support vector regression(SVR),long short-term memory(LSTM)net,gated recurrent unit(GRU),and transformer models for the inventory level of liquid Helium of magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)equipment,and to assess the applicability of each model in time series data of single equipment and small sample.Methods:A total of 340 records of inventory level of liquid helium were obtained from one magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)equipment at West China Hospital,Sichuan University,between February 24 and May 29,2024.The records were chronologically divided into training,validation,and test sets at a ratio of 6:2:2,which included respectively 204 records,68 records and 68 records.Four models were trained by using the information of historical liquid helium levels and time-interval,and recursive multi-step prediction was performed on the validation and test sets.The performance of recursive prediction was evaluated by using the coefficient of determination(R2),root mean squared error(RMSE),mean absolute error(MAE),mean absolute percentage error(MAPE),and residual standard deviation.Results:In test set,SVR achieved an R2 of 0.976,and the RMSE,MAE,and residual standard deviation of that were respectively 0.56,0.47 and 0.56,and the MAPE of that was 0.89%,which appeared the best comprehensive performance.The each predictive indicator of GRU was similar to those of SVR.In the validation set,the comprehensive error of LSTM was the lowest.Conclusion:Under the conditions of single equipment and small sample data of this study,SVR can demonstrate the highest prediction accuracy in the test set,however,the fitting superiority of each model existed significant fluctuation at different data phases,such as the validation and test sets.The stability and external applicability of model still need further validation through using multiple equipment,multiple cycles of supplemental liquid,and prospective data.
樊立天;屈文;谢思源;刘麒麟
四川大学华西医院医学工程科 成都 610041四川大学华西医院医学工程科 成都 610041四川大学华西医院医学工程科 成都 610041四川大学华西医院医学工程科 成都 610041
医药卫生
液氦存量机器学习预测性维护磁共振成像
Inventory level of liquid HeliumMachine learningPredictive maintenanceMagnetic resonance imaging(MRI)
《中国医学装备》 2026 (8)
159-164,6
评论