首页|期刊导航|中国全科医学|抗生素骨水泥联合负压封闭引流技术治疗糖尿病足有效性和安全性的Meta分析

抗生素骨水泥联合负压封闭引流技术治疗糖尿病足有效性和安全性的Meta分析OA

Efficacy and Safety of Antibiotic Bone Cement Combined with Vacuum Sealing Drainage for Diabetic Foot:a Meta-analysis

中文摘要英文摘要

背景 糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)是常见的慢性难愈性创面,给患者的健康和经济带来了严重的负面影响.近年来,抗生素骨水泥(ABC)被逐渐应用于 DFU 的治疗.然而,其有效性和安全性尚未得到充分评估.目的本研究通过 Meta 分析整合随机对照试验(RCT)数据,评估 ABC 治疗 DFU 的有效性及安全性,从而为临床治疗提供方向.方法 计算机检索中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、维普网、中国生物医学文献数据库、PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、Web of Science 等数据库,检索建库至 2025 年 1 月发表的ABC 治疗糖尿病足的RCT.由 2 名研究者独立筛选文献并提取数据,最终纳入 13 项 RCT,包含 843 例患者,试验组为 ABC 联合负压封闭引流技术(VSD)治疗,对照组为单纯的 VSD 治疗.采用 RevMan 5.3 软件对创面愈合时间、临床有效率、细菌转阴天数、住院时间、手术次数、截肢率、视觉模拟评分量表(VAS)评分、治疗 1 周后细菌培养阳性率、不良反应进行 Meta 分析,异质性较高时采用随机效应模型.结果 Meta 分析显示,联合 ABC 治疗能显著缩短 DFU 的创面愈合时间(MD=-14.46,95%CI=-19.69~-9.23,P<0.05),提高临床有效率(OR=7.81,95%CI=3.94~17.48,P<0.05),缩短细菌转阴天数(MD=-4.04,95%CI=-5.13~-2.94,P<0.05),减少治疗 1 周后细菌培养阳性结果的发生(OR=0.27,95%CI=0.14~0.50,P<0.05),降低截肢率(OR=0.14,95%CI=0.03~0.62,P=0.01),减少手术次数(MD=-1.77,95%CI=-2.52~-1.03,P<0.05),降低 VAS 评分(MD=-1.96,95%CI=-1.96~-0.57,P<0.05).同时,所有纳入的研究中 ABC 治疗 DFU 均未声明发生不良反应.对于创面愈合时间,根据研究对象的不同分为 Wagner 5 级组和非 Wagner 5 级组,又根据负载抗生素的种类不同分为联用组和单用组.非 Wagner 5 级组结果显示,与单纯的 VSD 治疗相比,ABC 联合 VSD 治疗能显著缩短 DFU 患者的创面愈合时间(MD=-6.31,95%CI=-7.88~-4.74,P<0.05);Wagner 5 级组的结果显示,试验组与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(MD=-8.02,95%CI=-20.11~4.07,P=0.19).单用抗生素组的结果显示,与单纯的 VSD 治疗相比,ABC 联合 VSD 治疗能缩短 DFU 患者的创面愈合时间(MD=-4.52,95%CI=-5.81~-3.23,P<0.05);联用抗生素组的结果显示,与单纯的 VSD 治疗相比,ABC 联合 VSD 治疗能显著缩短DFU 患者的创面愈合时间(MD=-14.21,95%CI=-18.20~-10.21,P<0.05).对于住院时间,根据研究对象的年龄不同,分为平均年龄≥60 岁组和平均年龄<60 岁组.平均年龄≥60 岁组结果显示,与单纯的 VSD 治疗相比,ABC 联合VSD治疗能缩短DFU患者的住院时间(MD=-6.82,95%CI=-10.93~-2.71,P=0.001);平均年龄<60岁组结果显示,试验组和对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(MD=-5.11,95%CI=-17.78~7.56,P=0.45).对于手术次数,根据创面处理的方式不同分为有植皮组和无植皮组.无植皮组的结果显示,与单纯的 VSD 治疗相比,ABC 联合 VSD 治疗能减少DFU 患者的手术次数(MD=-1.79,95%CI=-2.13~-1.46,P<0.05);有植皮组的结果显示,与单纯的 VSD 治疗相比,ABC 联合 VSD 治疗能明显减少 DFU 患者的手术次数(MD=-1.89,95%CI=-3.27~-0.50,P=0.008).进行敏感性分析发现,本研究的结果稳健.结论 ABC 联合 VSD 是治疗 DFU 的安全高效疗法,尤其适用于非 Wagner 5 级患者及老年群体,联用抗生素及联合植皮术可进一步增效.

Background Diabetic foot ulcers(DFU)represent prevalent chronic wounds with significant negative impacts on patients'health and socioeconomic status.Antibiotic bone cement(ABC)has emerged as a therapeutic option,though its efficacy and safety require comprehensive evaluation.Objective To perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials(RCT)assessing the efficacy and safety of ABC for DFU,thereby providing evidence-based guidance for clinical practice.Methods We systematically searched CNKI,Wanfang Data,VIP,China Biomedical Literature Database,PubMed,Cochrane Library,Embase,and Web of Science for RCT published until January 2025.Thirteen RCT involving 843 patients were included.The intervention group received ABC combined with vacuum sealing drainage(VSD),while controls received VSD alone.Outcomes included wound healing time,clinical efficacy rate,bacterial clearance time,hospital stay,surgical frequency,amputation rate,visual analogue scale(VAS)scores,and adverse events.RevMan 5.3 was used with random-effects models for heterogeneous data.Results The meta-analysis demonstrated that combined ABC therapy significantly:reduced wound healing time(MD=-14.46,95%CI=-19.69 to-9.23;P<0.05),increased clinical efficacy rates(OR=7.81,95%CI=3.94 to 17.48,P<0.05),shortened bacterial clearance time(MD=-4.04,95%CI=-5.13 to-2.94,P<0.05),decreased positive bacterial cultures at 1-week post-treatment(OR=0.27,95%CI=0.14 to 0.50,P<0.05),lowered amputation rates(OR=0.14,95%CI=0.03 to 0.62,P=0.01),reduced surgical frequency(MD=-1.77,95%CI=-2.52 to-1.03,P<0.05);decreased VAS scores(MD=-1.96,95%CI=-2.35 to-0.57,P<0.05).Additionally,no adverse events were reported across the included studies.For wound healing time,it was divided into Wagner 5 group and non-Wagner 5 group according to different research subjects,and divided into combination group and monotherapy group according to different types of antibiotics.The results of the non-Wagner 5 group showed that ABC combined with VSD treatment could significantly shorten the wound healing time of DFU patients compared with VSD treatment alone(MD=-6.31,95%CI=-7.88 to-4.74,P<0.05);The results of the Wagner grade 5 group showed that there was no significant difference between the experimental group and the control group(MD=-8.02,95%CI=-20.11 to 4.07,P=0.19).The results of the antibiotic alone group showed that ABC combined with VSD treatment could shorten the wound healing time of DFU patients compared with VSD alone(MD=-4.52,95%CI=-5.81 to-3.23,P<0.05).The results of the combination antibiotic group showed that ABC combined with VSD treatment could significantly shorten the wound healing time of DFU patients compared with VSD alone(MD=-14.21,95%CI=-18.20 to-10.21,P<0.05).For the length of hospitalization,according to the age of the study subjects,they were divided into the average age greater than 60 years old group and the average age less than 60 years group.The results of the mean age group greater than 60 years showed that ABC combined with VSD treatment could shorten the hospital stay of DFU patients compared with VSD treatment alone(MD=-6.82,95%CI=-10.93 to-2.71,P=0.001).The results of the average age less than 60 years old group showed that there was no significant difference between the experimental group and the control group(MD=-5.11,95%CI=-17.78 to 7.56,P=0.45).For the number of surgeries,according to the wound treatment methods,it is divided into a group with skin graft and a group without skin grafting.The results of the no skin graft group showed that ABC combined with VSD treatment could reduce the number of surgeries in DFU patients compared with VSD treatment alone(MD=-1.79,95%CI=-2.13 to-1.46,P<0.05).The results of the skin graft group showed that ABC combined with VSD treatment could significantly reduce the number of surgeries in patients with DFU compared with VSD treatment alone(MD=-1.89,95%CI=-3.27 to-0.50,P=0.008).Sensitivity analysis was performed and the results of this study were found.Conclusion In this study,ABC combined with VSD is a safe and effective therapy for DFU,especially for non-Wagner grade 5 patients and the elderly,and the combination of antibiotics and skin grafting can further enhance the efficacy.

郭治宏;陈盈盈;刘德伍

330006 江西省南昌市,南昌大学第一附属医院烧伤与创面修复中心330006 江西省南昌市,南昌大学第一附属医院烧伤与创面修复中心330006 江西省南昌市,南昌大学第一附属医院烧伤与创面修复中心

医药卫生

糖尿病足足溃疡,糖尿病性骨水泥成形术抗生素骨水泥负压伤口疗法负压封闭引流创面愈合Meta分析

Diabetic footFoot ulcer,diabeticCementoplastyAntibiotic bone cementsNegative-pressure wound therapyVaccum sealing drainageWound healingMeta-analysis

《中国全科医学》 2026 (30)

4503-4512,10

国家自然科学基金资助项目(82460447)

10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2025.0102

评论