首页|期刊导航|中国药房|维迪西妥单抗联合特瑞普利单抗一线治疗HER2表达局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌的成本-效用分析

维迪西妥单抗联合特瑞普利单抗一线治疗HER2表达局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌的成本-效用分析OA

Cost-utility analysis of disitamab vedotin plus toripalimab as first-line treatment for HER2-expressing locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 从中国卫生体系视角,评价维迪西妥单抗(DV)联合特瑞普利单抗对比含铂化疗方案一线治疗人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)表达的局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌(UC)的经济性.方法 采用成本-效用分析法,基于RC48-C016研究构建三状态分区生存模型,模型周期为1周,模拟DV联合特瑞普利单抗和含铂化疗方案一线治疗HER2表达的局部晚期或转移性UC的长期健康获益[质量调整生命年(QALYs)]和成本情况.模拟时限为15年,折现率为4.5%,以2025年我国人均国内生产总值(GDP)的2倍(199 330元/QALY)为意愿支付(WTP)阈值,比较两组的增量成本-效果比(ICER),并开展单因素敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析.结果 与含铂化疗方案相比,DV 联合特瑞普利单抗方案可多获得1.01 QALYs,但成本增加183 224.45元,ICER为181 728.15元/QALY,低于WTP阈值;在当前阈值下,DV联合方案具有成本-效用优势的概率为79.9%.结论 以2倍2025年我国人均GDP为WTP阈值时,DV联合特瑞普利单抗较含铂化疗一线治疗HER2表达的局部晚期或转移性UC具有成本-效用优势.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-utility of disitamab vedotin(DV)combined with toripalimab versus platinum-containing chemotherapy as first-line therapy for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma(UC)with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)expression from the perspective of China's health-care system.METHODS A cost-utility analysis was performed.A three-state partitioned survival model was constructed based on the RC48-C016 trial with a 1-week cycle length.The long-term health benefits[quality-adjusted life years(QALYs)]and costs of disitamab vedotin combined with toripalimab versus platinum-containing chemotherapy as first-line therapy for locally advanced or metastatic UC with HER2 expression were simulated.The simulation time horizon was set to 15 years,and the discount rate was 4.5%.The willingness-to-pay(WTP)threshold was defined as twice China's per capita gross domestic product(GDP)in 2025(199 330 yuan/QALY).The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio(ICER)between the two groups was compared,and one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted.RESULTS Compared with platinum-containing chemotherapy regimen,the DV plus toripalimab regimen yielded an additional 1.01 QALYs with an incremental cost of 183 224.45 yuan,and the ICER was 181 728.15 yuan/QALY,which was below the WTP threshold.At the current threshold,the probability that the DV combination regimen had a cost-utility advantage was 79.9%.CONCLUSIONS Taking twice China's per capita GDP in 2025 as the WTP threshold,DV combined with toripalimab exhibits a cost-utility advantage over platinum-containing chemotherapy as first-line treatment for HER2-expressing locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

向佩妍;张慧;张凯鑫;曾桂浩;蔡毕坤;刘宇航;胡双双;刘永辉

广东药科大学医药商学院,广州 510006||广东药科大学卫生经济与健康促进研究中心,广州 510006||广东药科大学卫生经济与大健康研究中心,广州 510006广东药科大学医药商学院,广州 510006||广东药科大学卫生经济与健康促进研究中心,广州 510006||广东药科大学卫生经济与大健康研究中心,广州 510006广东药科大学医药商学院,广州 510006||广东药科大学卫生经济与健康促进研究中心,广州 510006||广东药科大学卫生经济与大健康研究中心,广州 510006广东药科大学医药商学院,广州 510006||广东药科大学卫生经济与健康促进研究中心,广州 510006||广东药科大学卫生经济与大健康研究中心,广州 510006广东药科大学医药商学院,广州 510006||广东药科大学卫生经济与健康促进研究中心,广州 510006||广东药科大学卫生经济与大健康研究中心,广州 510006南京医科大学药学院,南京 211166广东药科大学医药商学院,广州 510006||广东药科大学卫生经济与健康促进研究中心,广州 510006||广东药科大学卫生经济与大健康研究中心,广州 510006广东药科大学医药商学院,广州 510006||广东药科大学卫生经济与健康促进研究中心,广州 510006||广东药科大学卫生经济与大健康研究中心,广州 510006

医药卫生

维迪西妥单抗特瑞普利单抗尿路上皮癌成本-效用分析分区生存模型

disitamab vedotintoripalimaburothelial carcinomacost-utility analysispartitioned survival model

《中国药房》 2026 (16)

2138-2143,6

教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(No.22YJAZH147)广东省普通高校特色创新类项目(No.2024WTSCX1-07)广东现代医院管理研究所2025-2026年度专项研究课题(No.GDXDYGS2025061)广东药科大学药物经济学与卫生技术评估研究团队项目(No.2024ZZ13)

10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2026.16.10

评论