首页|期刊导航|中国标准化|标准与法律协调中的术语基础构建研究

标准与法律协调中的术语基础构建研究OACHSSCD

Study on Building a Terminological Foundation for the Coordination between Standards and Laws

中文摘要英文摘要

本文以GB/T 20000.3-2025《标准化活动规则 第3部分:法规引用标准的指南》与《中华人民共和国立法法》对"法规"的界定差异为切入点,系统探讨标准与法律在基础术语层面的协调问题.《中华人民共和国立法法》基于规范主义逻辑,将"法规"严格限定于行政法规与地方性法规;《指南》则从实用功能出发,将其拓展为涵盖法律、法规、规章及行政规范性文件的广义集合.这一术语分歧折射出两大体系在目标取向与生成逻辑上的深层差异.在此基础上,进一步提出在尊重各自体系特征的基础上,通过核心术语调适、协同机制完善,逐步构建标准与法律间的"共同语言",推动二者从形式协调走向实质融合,为治理体系现代化提供更坚实的规则支撑.

This paper is based on the difference in the definition of the term"regulations"between GB/T 20000.3-2025,Rules for standardization—Part 3:Guidelines for referencing standards in regulations,and the Legislation Law of the People's Republic of China.It systematically discusses the issue of terminological coordination between standards and laws at the fundamental terminology level.The Legislation Law,based on a normativist logic,strictly defines"regulations"as referring only to administrative regulations and local regulations.In contrast,GB/T 20000.32025,driven by practical considerations,expands the term into a broad category encompassing laws,regulations,rules,and administrative normative documents.This terminological divergence reflects deeper differences between the two systems in terms of objectives and generative logic.Building on this analysis,the paper proposes that,while respecting the characteristics of each system,a"common language"between standards and laws should be gradually constructed through adjustments to core terminology and the improvement of coordination mechanisms.This approach aims to advance their relationship from formal alignment to substantive integration,in order to provide a solid foundation of rules for the modernization of the governance system.

王冠华

中国设备监理协会

标准法律法规术语协调

standardlawregulationterminologycoordination

《中国标准化》 2026 (17)

58-61,4

10.3969/j.issn.1002-5944.2026.17.002

评论