国际海底电缆安全管辖权的边界、演进与重构OACHSSCD
The Boundaries,Evolution,and Reconstruction of Jurisdiction over International Submarine Cable Security
国际海底电缆兼具关键基础设施、跨境通信通道和全球公共产品属性,其安全风险集中表现为海洋法管辖权边界的制度张力.《联合国海洋法公约》虽确立梯度管辖框架,但立法与执法管辖分离、"适当顾及"标准不明、蓄意破坏和"灰色地带"规则不足、全球公共产品供给缺位等四重规范缺口共同制约着治理效能.国际司法、替代性规则和国家实践正通过有限强化、补充适用和功能扩张推动管辖权边界演进.对此,我国应坚持总体国家安全观,完善专门立法、刑法适用、程序化执法机制和国际规则塑造路径.
International submarine cables have the attributes of critical infrastructure,cross-border communication channels and de facto global public goods,and their security risks are concentrated in the institutional tensions surrounding jurisdictional boundaries under the law of the sea.Although UNCLOS establishes a graduated jurisdictional framework,four normative gaps remain:the separation between prescriptive and enforcement jurisdiction,unclear due-regard standards,insufficient rules on intentional damage and grey-zone conduct,and inadequate provision of global public goods,all of which constrain governance effectiveness.International judicial practice,alternative legal regimes and state practice are driving the evolution of jurisdictional boundaries through limited reinforcement,supplementary application and functional expansion.China should therefore adhere to the holistic approach to national security and improve specialized legislation,criminal-law application,procedural enforcement and international rule-making.
郭冉
上海海事大学,上海 201306
社会科学
国际海底电缆关键基础设施全球公共产品管辖权边界涉外法治
international submarine cablescritical infrastructureglobal public goodsjurisdictional boundariesthe foreign-related rule of law
《太平洋学报》 2026 (7)
87-100,14
本文系国家社会科学基金重点项目"'三大全球倡议'重大理论和实践问题研究"(24AZD051)的阶段性研究成果.
评论