首页|期刊导航|太平洋学报|认知刚性与威胁弹性:安全化视域下的俄罗斯"混合战争"研究

认知刚性与威胁弹性:安全化视域下的俄罗斯"混合战争"研究OACHSSCD

Cognitive Rigidity and Threat Elasticity:A Study on Russia's"Hybrid Warfare"through the Lens of Securitization

中文摘要英文摘要

"混合战争"作为近年来国际问题研究中的热点概念,其内涵不断扩展并被赋予突出的政治功能.本文从安全化视角出发,分析俄罗斯如何借助"混合战争"叙事将威胁感知转化为治理逻辑与政策实践.为弥补传统安全化理论的不足,本文提出"认知刚性—威胁弹性"模型,并引入"弹性威胁模板"作为核心分析工具.本文认为,俄罗斯"混合战争"议题安全化的核心机制体现为对"西方威胁"的认知刚性与"混合战争"叙事的威胁弹性相互作用:前者为安全化提供历史—心理基础,后者则为安全化提供可不断延展的话语框架和政策接口.二者相互强化,推动"混合战争"由外来概念逐步演变为服务于国家安全建构的工具性话语.俄罗斯的这一安全化实践在强化政权合法性、推动社会整合和拓展外交动员的同时,也伴随着威胁泛化、制度成本上升和国际规则侵蚀等风险.本文由此揭示了当代国际政治中历史认知、叙事建构与政策实践如何相互联动,以共同塑造国家安全治理逻辑.

As a prominent concept in recent international studies,"hybrid warfare"has undergone continual conceptual expansion and has been endowed with increasingly salient political functions.From the perspective of securitization,this article examines how Russia has employed the narrative of"hybrid warfare"to transform threat perceptions into a logic of governance and concrete policy practice.To address the limitations of conventional securitization theory,the article proposes a"cognitive rigidity-threat elasticity"model and introduces the concept of the"Elastic Threat Template"as its core analytical tool.It argues that the central mechanism underlying the securitization of"hybrid warfare"in Russia lies in the interaction between cognitive rigidity regarding the West's allegedly inherent hostility and the threat elasticity of the"hybrid warfare"narrative:the former provides the historical and psychological foundations for securitization,while the latter supplies an expandable discursive framework and policy interface through which securitization can proceed.Through their mutual reinforcement,"hybrid warfare"has gradually evolved from an imported concept into an instrumental discourse serving the construction of national security.While this securitizing practice has enhanced regime legitimacy,promoted social integration,and expanded Russia's capacity for diplomatic mobilization,it has also generated risks such as threat inflation,rising institutional costs,and the erosion of international rules.The article thus reveals how historical cognition,narrative construction,and policy practice interact in contemporary international politics to jointly shape the logic of national security governance.

郭凤丽;沈泽源

郑州大学,河南 郑州 450000中国社会科学院大学,北京 102488

社会科学

"混合战争"俄罗斯安全化战略叙事俄乌冲突国家安全

"hybrid warfare"Russiasecuritizationstrategic narrativeRussia-Ukraine conflictnational security

《太平洋学报》 2026 (7)

15-29,15

本文系中国博士后科学基金第77批面上资助项目(2025M773773)、2027年河南省高校人文社会科学研究一般项目"大国竞争背景下河南省对外开放风险评估及对策研究"(2027-ZZJH-199)的阶段性研究成果.

10.14015/j.cnki.1004-8049.2026.07.002

评论