我国高校分类评价的内在类型差异与改革侧重点OACHSSCD
Inherent Type Differences and Reform Priorities of Classified Evaluation of Universities in China
立足研究型、应用型、技能型的办学定位,从学生满意度角度对三类高校进行对比研究,认为三类高校学生满意度的层级分化逐渐模糊、满意度特征在类型间具有独立性,有必要推动分层评价与分类评价协同发展,促进高校评价从分层为主向分类为主转型.通过随机森林回归模型测算发现,学校教学与研究水平是共性评价重点,研究型高校重在服务国家重大战略需求,应用型高校侧重多样化特色化发展,技能型高校需要回归实践办学导向.建议把握类型差异、优化评价指标体系、引入多元评价主体、强化分类评价结果应用、完善评价配套机制.
Based on the educational orientations of research-oriented,application-oriented,and skill-oriented universities,a comparative study was conducted from the perspective of student satisfaction.The study found that the hierarchical differentiation of student satisfaction among these three types of universities is gradually blurring,while the satisfaction characteristics remain independent across types.It is necessary to promote the coordinated development of stratified evaluation and classified evaluation,and facilitate the transformation of university evaluation from primarily stratified evaluation to primarily classified evaluation.Through the calculation using a random forest regression model,it was found that the teaching and research levels are the focus of common evaluation.Research-oriented universities focus on serving major national strategic needs,application-oriented universities emphasize characteristic development,and skill-oriented universities need to return to a practical orientation in education.It is suggested to grasp the differences between types,optimize the evaluation index system,introduce multiple evaluation subjects,strengthen the application of classified evaluation results,and improve the supporting mechanisms for evaluation.
王克宇
华东师范大学国家教育宏观政策研究院,上海 200062||华东师范大学教育学部,上海 200062
社会科学
高等教育分类评价评价改革
Higher educationClassified evaluationEvaluation reform
《上海教育评估研究》 2026 (4)
32-37,6
评论