2024及2020年梅雨期新安江相似环流下致洪暴雨差异的成因及预警指征OA
Causes of differences and early warning indicators of flood-producing rainstorms under similar Meiyu-season circulation in the Xin'an River Basin:a comparative analysis of the 2020 and 2024 events
2024 及2020 年梅雨期新安江流域发生明显洪水,本文利用地面气象站观测资料、雨滴谱数据、风云卫星观测资料以及美国环境预报中心再分析资料,对比分析了两次致洪暴雨的环流成因、云微物理条件.结果发现:2024 及 2020 年两次致洪暴雨成因存在显著差异,两次暴雨虽都受典型梅汛期暴雨天气形势影响,梅雨锋上皆可见中小尺度气旋活动且有地形抬升叠加致使降水加强,但整层积分水汽通量及水汽通量散度的强度及空间分布差异直接导致暴雨的强度和空间分布存在明显不同.与2024 年相比,2020 年梅雨锋内 θse梯度更强,上干冷—下暖湿的不稳定结构导致的热力抬升与低层辐合造成的抬升相叠加,导致降水强度更强.2020 年更高的液态水含量和雨滴浓度,是整体雨强高于2024 年的主要原因之一.不同雨强区间内的雨滴谱特征不同,弱降水时,2024 年雨滴谱分布相对2020 年更均匀及稳定;强降水时,2024 年则呈变异性更大的"巨滴主导"模式.两次强降水结束的原因也存在明显差异,2024 年冷暖对峙前强后弱,暖湿气流加强北推导致强降水结束;2020 年则多弱冷空气渗透,冷空气南压导致强降水结束.两次致洪暴雨最强降水期间,短时暴雨出现在风云4 号(FY-4A/B)卫星红外通道和水汽通道云顶亮温快速下降到陡升之间的过渡期,对强降水的预警有较好的指示意义.
Severe flooding occurred in the Xin'an River Basin during the Meiyu season in both 2024 and 2020.Understanding the dynamical and microphysical differences between these two flood-producing rainfall events is important for improving heavy rainfall forecasting during the Meiyu period.In this study,surface meteorological observations,raindrop size distribution measurements,Fengyun satellite observations,and National Centers for Environmental Prediction(NCEP)reanalysis data were used to comparatively analyze the circulation background and cloud microphysical characteristics of the two events.Results indicate that although both rainstorms occurred under typical Meiyu-season synoptic conditions,characterized by mesoscale cyclonic activity along the Meiyu front and enhanced precipitation due to orographic lifting,their formation mechanisms exhibited notable differences.The intensity and spatial distribution of vertically integrated moisture flux and moisture flux divergence differed substantially between the two cases,leading to distinct rainfall intensity and spatial patterns.Compared with the 2024 event,the Meiyu front in 2020 showed a stronger equivalent potential temperature(θse)gradient.The unstable thermodynamic structure with dry-cold air aloft and warm-moist air in the lower troposphere enhanced thermodynamic lifting,which combined with low-level convergence-induced ascent,contributed to stronger rainfall intensity in 2020.In addition,higher liquid water content and greater raindrop number concentration were important factors responsible for the overall stronger precipitation in 2020.Raindrop size distribution characteristics varied across different rainfall intensity ranges.During weak precipitation,the raindrop spectra in 2024 were relatively more uniform and stable than those in 2020,whereas during heavy precipitation the 2024 event exhibited a more variable large-drop-dominated pattern.The termination mechanisms of the two rainfall events were also different.In 2024,rainfall weakened as strengthened warm and moist airflow pushed northward,while in 2020 the event ended mainly due to the southward intrusion of weak cold air.Furthermore,during the peak rainfall periods of both events,short-duration intense rainfall tended to occur during the transition stage when cloud-top brightness temperatures in the FY-4A/B infrared and water vapor channels rapidly decreased and then sharply increased.This feature provides a useful satellite-based indicator for the early warning of intense rainfall.
贾燕;黄娟;姜舒婕;彭霞云;宣卓林;唐韬
中国气象局 水文气象重点开放实验室,北京 100081||浙江省气象台,杭州 310051中国气象局 水文气象重点开放实验室,北京 100081||浙江省气象台,杭州 310051浙江省人工影响天气中心,杭州 310051浙江省气象台,杭州 310051浙江省气象台,杭州 310051浙江省气象台,杭州 310051
天文与地球科学
新安江梅雨锋持续性暴雨雨滴谱FY-4A/B
Xin'an RiverMeiyu frontpersistent rainstormraindrop spectrumFY-4A/B
《气象科学》 2026 (4)
354-365,12
中国气象局水文气象重点开放实验室开放研究课题(24SWQXZ026)全国暴雨研究开放基金项目(BYKJ2024Q24)浙江省气象局科技计划重点项目(2024ZD06)浙江省气象局科技计划重点项目(2023ZD05)
评论