首页|期刊导航|实用妇产科杂志|单孔改良微小穿刺孔与传统多孔腹腔镜侧腹壁悬吊术治疗中重度盆腔器官脱垂的疗效及安全性比较

单孔改良微小穿刺孔与传统多孔腹腔镜侧腹壁悬吊术治疗中重度盆腔器官脱垂的疗效及安全性比较OA

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety Between Modified Single-Port Mi-cropuncture and Traditional Multi-Port Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension for Moderate-to-Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:比较单孔改良微小穿刺孔腹腔镜侧腹壁悬吊术(MSPLLS)与传统多孔腹腔镜侧腹壁悬吊术(TPLLS)治疗中重度盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的疗效及安全性.方法:采用前瞻性随机对照研究,纳入2023 年1 月9 日至2024 年3 月29 日于成都市第一人民医院就诊的中重度[POP 定量分期系统(POP-Q)≥Ⅲ期]POP 患者 60 例,按随机数字表法分为 MSPLLS 组(30 例)和 TPLLS 组(30例).随访12 月,比较两组患者围手术期指标、术后疼痛视觉模拟(VAS)评分、POP-Q 分期变化、主观症状改善[盆底功能障碍影响问卷简表(PFDI-20)和盆底功能障碍影响问卷(PFIQ-7)]、瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)、瘢痕美观度、患者满意度及并发症发生率.结果:MSPLLS 组与 TPLLS 组手术时间、术中出血量及住院天数比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).MSPLLS 组术后 6、24、48 h 的 VAS评分均显著低于 TPLLS 组(P<0.05).两组术中、术后近期、远期并发症及 12 月时解剖学复发率(POP-Q≥Ⅱ期)和解剖学成功率(POP-Q≤Ⅰ期)差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组 PFDI-20、PFIQ-7 评分均在术后6、12 月明显降低(P<0.05),MSPLLS 组与 TPLLS 组的 PFDI-20 及 PFIQ-7 评分在术前、术后6、12 月组间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).MSPLLS 组 POSAS 评分总分、美观度 VAS 评分及患者的满意度均显著优于 TPLLS 组(P<0.05).结论:MSPLLS 与 TPLLS 治疗中重度 POP 均安全有效,疗效相当.MSPLLS 在减轻术后疼痛、改善瘢痕美观度方面具有显著优势,更符合微创理念,值得临床推广应用.

Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of modified single-port micropuncture laparoscopic lat-eral suspension(MSPLLS)with those of traditional multi-port laparoscopic lateral suspension(TPLLS)in the treat-ment of moderate to severe pelvic organ prolapse(POP).Methods:A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted.60 patients with moderate to severe POP[POP quantitative staging system(POP-Q)≥Stage III]trea-ted at Chengdu First People's Hospital from January 9,2023,to March 29,2024,were included and randomly as-signed to the MSPLLS group(n=30)or the TPLLS group(n=30)using a random number table.Patients were fol-lowed up for 12 months.Perioperative parametres,postoperative pain(VAS)scores,changes in pelvic organ pro-lapse quantification(POP-Q)stage,improvement in subjective symptoms(assessed by PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7),scar cosmesis(evaluated by POSAS),scar aesthetics,patient satisfaction and complication rates were compared be-tween the two groups.Results:There were no significant differences between the MSPLLS and TPLLS groups in operative time,estimated intraoperative blood loss,or length of hospital stay(P>0.05).The MSPLLS group had significantly lower VAS scores at 6,24,and 48 hours postoperatively compared to the TPLLS group(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in intraoperative,early postoperative,or long-term complications,nor in recurrence rates or anatomical success rates(defined as POP-Q stage≤Ⅰ)at 12 months between the two groups(P>0.05).Both groups exhibited significant reductions in PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 scores at 6 and 12 months postoperatively(P<0.05).No statistically significant differences in PFDI-20 or PFIQ-7 scores were observed between the MSPLLS and TPLLS groups preoperatively or at 6 and 12 months postoperatively(P>0.05).The MSPLLS group showed signifi-cantly better total POSAS scores,cosmetic VAS scores,and patient satisfaction than the TPLLS group(P<0.05).Conclusions:Both MSPLLS and TPLLS are safe and effective options for the treatment of moderate to severe POP,with comparable therapeutic efficacy.MSPLLS demonstrates significant advantages in reducing postoperative pain and improving scar cosmesis,thereby better aligning with the principles of minimally invasive surgery.It is wor-thy of clinical promotion and application.

徐宁;李元宏;李敏;吴红梅;李彦

成都市中西医结合医院 成都市第一人民医院妇科,四川 成都 610041成都市中西医结合医院 成都市第一人民医院妇科,四川 成都 610041成都市中西医结合医院 成都市第一人民医院妇科,四川 成都 610041成都市中西医结合医院 成都市第一人民医院妇科,四川 成都 610041成都市中西医结合医院 成都市第一人民医院妇科,四川 成都 610041

医药卫生

盆腔器官脱垂单孔腹腔镜微小穿刺孔侧腹壁悬吊术微创手术

Pelvic organ prolapseSingle-port laparoscopyMicropunctureLateral suspensionMinimally inva-sive surgery

《实用妇产科杂志》 2026 (8)

697-702,6

评论