技术范式转移下生成式AI搜索的垄断风险及其治理框架OACHSSCD
Monopoly Risks and Governance Framework for Generative AI Search Under Technological Paradigm Shift
[目的]以大语言模型为核心驱动的生成式 AI 搜索正推动信息检索从"搜索引擎"向"答案引擎"的范式跃迁.既有研究对此引发的新型垄断风险关注不足,文章系统识别生成式 AI 搜索的垄断行为样态及其竞争损害机理,并据此提出适配技术范式转移特征的制度因应方案.[方法]采用文献分析法梳理搜索市场竞争范式的演进脉络,运用案例分析法与描述性研究法剖析生成式 AI 搜索中自我优待、捆绑搭售、强制抓取内容和剥削性定价等垄断行为的表现形态与规制困境.[结果/结论]竞争范式变迁重塑了搜索平台的垄断行为样态,衍生出横向排他性滥用与纵向剥削性滥用的双重风险.生成式 AI 搜索的垄断治理并非传统搜索引擎竞争问题的简单延续,而是技术范式转移背景下对搜索市场竞争秩序的重新审视与规制回应.反垄断法应突破事后规制的路径惯性,在科林格里奇困境警示下构建前瞻性、动态性治理框架,以实现技术创新与垄断风险防控的动态均衡.
[Purpose]Generative AI search,powered by large language models,is driving a paradigm shift in information retrieval from"search engines"to"answer engines".Existing research has paid insufficient attention to the novel monopoly risks arising from this trans-formation.This paper systematically identifies the patterns of monopolistic conduct in generative AI search and their mechanisms of com-petitive harm,and proposes institutional responses tailored to the characteristics of this technological paradigm shift.[Method]A literature analysis is employed to trace the evolutionary trajectory of competitive paradigms in the search market.Case analysis and descriptive re-search methods are applied to examine the manifestations and regulatory dilemmas of monopolistic practices in generative AI search,inclu-ding self-preferencing,tying and bundling,compulsory content crawling,and exploitative pricing.[Result/Conclusion]The shift in competitive paradigms has reshaped the patterns of monopolistic conduct by search platforms,giving rise to dual risks of horizontal exclu-sionary abuse and vertical exploitative abuse.Antitrust governance of generative AI search is not a mere extension of traditional search en-gine competition issues,but rather a fundamental reexamination of competitive order in the search market under the context of technological paradigm shift.Antitrust law should move beyond the path dependence of ex post regulation and,informed by the Collingridge dilemma,establish a proactive and adaptive governance framework to achieve a dynamic equilibrium between fostering technological innovation and mitigating monopoly risks.
詹馥静
同济大学法学院 上海 200092
社会科学
生成式AI搜索技术范式转移排他性滥用剥削性滥用反垄断治理
generative AI searchtechnological paradigm shiftexclusionary abuseexploitative abuseantitrust governance
《情报杂志》 2026 (9)
88-95,8
国家社会科学基金青年项目"数字内容平台常态化监管的反垄断路径研究"(编号:24CFX045)上海市白玉兰人才计划浦江项目"人工智能领域的垄断风险与法律规制研究"(编号:24PJC074)研究成果.
评论