首页|期刊导航|情报杂志|美国"军工科媒学复合体"对华操纵认知战手段及应对

美国"军工科媒学复合体"对华操纵认知战手段及应对OACHSSCD

The U.S."Military-Industrial-Media-Academic-Scientific Complex":Cognitive Warfare Tactics Against China and Countermeasures

中文摘要英文摘要

[目的]本研究旨在拆解"军工科媒学复合体"这一新型认知战工具的生成机理与运作机制,剖析其对华认知战的主要手段及多重危害.[方法]运用历史演进分析法梳理复合体从冷战奠基到 21 世纪全面成型的发展脉络,同时采用系统论视角构建"军方主导、企业执行、智媒配合"的三层架构分析模型,并结合深度伪造、声音克隆等典型案例,揭示人工智能技术赋能下的认知操纵逻辑.[结果/结论]研究发现,美式认知战已形成"战略规划—技术赋能—话语修饰—认知锚定"的完整闭环,通过利益捆绑、旋转门机制与技术黑箱,严重损害中国形象、破坏全球科技秩序并加剧阵营对抗.研究同时揭示该复合体存在"工—军"利益冲突、"科"的伦理争议、"学"的独立性张力、"媒"的公信力反噬四重内部矛盾,为精准反制提供了突破口.据此,提出四项应对策略:坚守认知公共产品属性以消解霸权正当性;构建多边合作机制破解认知孤立;通过科技赋能与自主学术话语体系夯实防御能力;推动全球认知治理法治化确立国际行为准则.

[Purpose]The purpose of this study is to dismantle the formation mechanism and operation mechanism of"military-industrial-media-academic-scientific complex",a new cognitive warfare tool,and analyze its main means and multiple hazards in cognitive war-fare against China.[Method]Utilizing a historical evolutionary analysis,this paper traces the development of this complex from its foun-dations during the Cold War to its full maturation in the 21st century.Simultaneously,from a systems theory perspective,it constructs a three-tiered analytical model characterized by"military leadership,corporate execution,and intellectual-media coordination".By exami-ning representative cases such as deepfakes and voice cloning,the study reveals the logic of cognitive manipulation empowered by Artificial Intelligence(AI).[Result/Conclusion]The study finds that U.S.style cognitive warfare has formed a complete closed-loop consisting of"strategic planning,technological empowerment,discourse modification,and cognitive anchoring".Through interest bundling,"re-volving door"mechanisms,and technological"black boxes",it severely tarnishes China's international image,disrupts the global techno-logical order,and intensifies bloc confrontation.The study also reveals that this complex exhibits four internal contradictions:industry-military conflicts of interest,ethical controversies in science,tensions over academic independence,and backlash against media credibility,thereby providing a breakthrough point for precise countermeasures.Accordingly,this paper proposes four counter-strategies:upholding the attribute of cognitive security as a public good to dissolve hegemonic legitimacy;constructing multilateral cooperation mechanisms to break cognitive isolation;strengthening defensive capabilities through technological empowerment and an autonomous academic discourse system;and advancing the rule of law in global cognitive governance to establish international norms of conduct.

孙祥阳;凌瑞;张李斌

中国人民公安大学 北京 100038中国人民公安大学 北京 100038中国人民公安大学 北京 100038

社会科学

军工科媒学复合体认知战对华操纵大国博弈全球认知治理破局路径

military-industrial-media-academic-scientific complexcognitive warfarechina-targeted manipulationgreat-power com-petitionglobal cognitive governancebreakthrough pathways

《情报杂志》 2026 (9)

54-62,9

国家社会科学基金重大项目"新时代推进国家安全体系与治理能力建设研究"(编号:2022ZDA122)研究成果.

10.3969/j.issn.1002-1965.2026.09.008

评论