检察机关提起环境刑事附带民事公益诉讼的程序制度研究OACHSSCD
Research on the Procedure of Environmental Criminal Incidental Civil Public Interest Litigation Filed by Procuratorial Organs
环境刑事附带民事公益诉讼是检察公益诉讼的重要类型之一,相关案件数量整体呈上升趋势,但是观察司法实践,该诉讼仍存在诉前公告程序虚置空转和诉讼审理程序运行肆意,及诉讼辅助程序展开受阻等程序运转不畅情形.相关法律制度储备不足是构成该程序运转不畅的制度成因,而关键原因则是在理论研究层面尚未厘清此类诉讼所涉及的民刑关系.鉴于"先民后刑""先刑后民""民刑并行"三类案件处理模式与环境刑事附带民事公益诉讼之间不兼容,以"刑—民—刑"作为此类诉讼的案件处理模式更具合理性和可行性.在此基础上,以"诉前公告程序为主、其他前置程序为辅"配置检察机关提起环境刑事附带民事公益诉讼之诉前前置程序,并强调诉前前置程序启动的审慎性.就诉讼审理程序而言,一要从规范化明晰和程序性保障两方面出发落实诉讼请求的精准化,二要通过构建具备阶段性、附带性等特色的证明标准,以及夯实"谁主张、谁举证"的证明责任,完善正当合理的环境刑事附带民事公益诉讼的证明制度.
The overall number of cases related to environmental criminal incidental civil public interest litigation in prosecutorial public interest litigation is on the rise.However,in judicial practice,there are still some problems in the litigation such as the vacancy of the pre-litigation announcement procedure,the wanton operation of the litigation trial procedure and the obstruction of the auxiliary litigation proce-dure.The lack of relevant legal system reserves is the institutional cause of the poor operation of the pro-cedure,and the key reason is that the civil and criminal relations involved in such litigation have not been clarified at the theoretical research level.In view of the incompatibility between the three types of case handling modes of"civil before criminal","criminal before civil",and"parallel civil and crimi-nal"and the environmental criminal incidental civil public interest litigation,it is more reasonable and feasible to use"criminal-civil-criminal"as the case handling mode for such litigation.On this basis,the pre-litigation procedure for the prosecution of environmental criminal incidental civil public interest litigation is configured with"pre-litigation announcement proce-dure as the main and other pre-procedures as the supplement",and the prudence of initiating the pre-litigation procedure is emphasized.As far as the litigation trial procedure is concerned,it is necessary firstly to implement the precision of the litigation request from the two aspects of standardization and pro-cedural guarantee,secondly to construct a standard of proof with the characteristics of stage and inciden-tality,and to consolidate the burden of proof of"who advocates and who proves",so as to improve the proper and reasonable proof system of environmental criminal incidental civil public interest litigation.
王亚萍
中南财经政法大学法学院 湖北 武汉 430073
社会科学
检察机关检察公益诉讼刑事附带民事公益诉讼环境刑事附带民事公益诉讼
procuratorial organsprocuratorial public interest litigationcriminal incidental civil public interest litigationenvironmental criminal incidental civil public interest litigation
《华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2026 (4)
75-90,158,17
国家哲学社会科学基金后期项目"生态环境损害责任抗辩事由类型化研究"(23FFXB070)湖北省高校人文社科重点研究基地——中南财经政法大学双碳法治与经济研究院青年创新项目"碳排放配额交易的合同法规制研究"(STQN032025001).
评论