申诉求决类信访与申请行政履职交叉案件的审理类型化构造OACHSSCD
The Typological Construction of Judicial Adjudication for Cross-Cases Involving Petitions for Rights and Administrative Performance Requests:An Empirical Analysis Based on 275 Judicial Documents
在申诉求决类信访与申请行政履职交叉案件中,全国法院普遍采取"关联合法私益"与"法定处理职责"的两要件审理思路.基于对全国三级法院近五年 275 份裁判文书的实证分析,上述"关联合法私益"要件杂糅了多种理论学说,体现出极强的实用主义倾向,却在理论与实践层面均存在不足.具言之,域外的保护规范理论根植于"主观诉讼"假定,但我国的行政诉讼呈现"内错裂"状态,因而在理论上难以直接适配.尤其在有奖举报等公私利益交融案件中,该理论在司法审查中的适用也面临现实障碍.与此同时,本土的"直接联系论"和"实际影响论"则又对反射利益的识别力有不逮.二者弊端的叠加,导致"关联合法私益"要件的僵化.因此,有必要以类型化思维对现有理论框架与审查路径进行整理,努力形塑出"私益保护常规型""私益保护特殊型""公私利益交融型"的类型化审理框架.在此基础上,通过"利害关系→诉的利益"的司法审查体系链,对此类案件属于信访事项还是行政诉讼受案范围予以综合判断,促进"送上门的群众工作"与行政审判服务社会大局的功能实现高质量的融合发展.
In judicial cases involving the intersection of petition matters seeking resolution of claims and applications requiring administrative agencies to perform their statutory duties,courts nationwide generally adopt a dual-element review approach of"legally protected private interests"and"statutory handling ob-ligations".Based on empirical analysis of 275 judicial documents from courts at three levels nationwide o-ver the past five years,the aforementioned"legally protected private interests"element integrates multi-ple theoretical doctrines yet demonstrates both theoretical and practical inadequacies.Specifically,the protective norm theory derived from foreign jurisdictions is grounded in the presumption of"subjective lit-igation,"whereas China's administrative litigation system exhibits"internal dissonance".This creates not only theoretical incompatibility but also practical difficulties in adapting judicial review to cases where public and private interests intertwine,as exemplified by reward-based whistle blowing cases.The do-mestically developed theories of"direct connection"and"actual impact"lack sufficient capacity to dis-tinguish reflected interests from legally protected ones;the compounding of their limitations has resulted in rigidity when applying the"legally protected private interests"criterion.Consequently,it is necessary to restructure the existing theoretical framework and judicial practice through typological thinking,and strive to establish a typological review framework comprising"conventional private interest protection","special private interest protection",and"public-private interest integration".On this basis,through the judicial review chain of"interest relationship → litigation benefits",a comprehensive judgment is made on whether such cases belong to the scope of petition matters or the scope of administrative litiga-tion,which can promote the high-quality integration and development of"door-to-door mass work"and the function of administrative trial serving the overall social situation.
傅瀚蓬
清华大学法学院 北京100084
社会科学
申诉求决类信访行政诉讼类型化信访工作法治化履行法定职责诉的利益
petitioning for complaint resolutioncategorization of administrative litigationrule-of-law-based regulation of petitioning workperformance of statutory dutieslitigation benefits
《华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2026 (4)
61-74,14
全国教育科学规划中国教育法治与全球教育治理研究专项重点项目"构建中国教育法学自主知识体系研究"(ZFA250488)
评论