首页|期刊导航|华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)|新《公司法》视阈下有限责任公司财务资助的法律规制路径构建

新《公司法》视阈下有限责任公司财务资助的法律规制路径构建OACHSSCD

Constructing Legal Regulatory Pathways for Financial Assistance by Limited Liability Companies from the Perspective of New Company Law

中文摘要英文摘要

新《公司法》第163 条明确将股份有限公司纳入财务资助禁令规制范畴,却对有限责任公司是否适用保持沉默,这无法解决司法实践对财务资助的裁判标准长期不一的问题.代理成本理论为豁免有限责任公司财务资助禁令提供了合理的解释空间,但无法规避财务资助的内生性和外缘性风险.由于财务资助行为具有经营与分配的双重属性,且与其他资本流出行为存在重叠之处,需要引入偿债能力测试对具有违法性的财务资助行为进行规制从而防控风险.在认定标准上,遵循"衡平测试优先、资产负债表测试兜底、资本充足率测试辅佐"的标准.在权责配置上,将财务资助决策权归属于董事会并强化信义义务,同时赋予债权人撤销权,实现融资效率与债权人保护的利益平衡.在规范衔接上,以"实质重于形式"的穿透式审查,辅以"交易目的测试"区分财务资助与关联担保等其他资本流出行为,从而防控有限责任公司财务资助的风险.

Article 163 of the Company Law of the People's Republic of China,includes joint stoke limit-ed companies within the scope of the prohibition on financial assistance,yet remains silent on whether the prohibition applies to limited liability companies,failing to resolve the long-standing issue of inconsistent judicial standards regarding financial assistance in judicial practice.The agency cost theory provides a reasonable framework for interpreting the exemption from the prohibition on financial assistance for limited liability companies,but it cannot eliminate the endogenous and exogenous risks of financial assistance.Because financial assistance has dual characteristics—both operational and distributive—and overlaps with other capital outflow activities,a solvency test must be introduced to regulate unlawful financial sup-port and thereby prevent risks.Regarding the criteria for determination,the approach follows the princi-ple of priority to the equity test,the balance sheet test as a fallback,and the capital adequacy ratio test as a supplement.Regarding the allocation of rights and responsibilities,decision-making authority over financial assistance should be vested in the board of directors,with a strengthened fiduciary duty,while creditors should be granted a right of avoidance to achieve a balance between financing efficiency and creditor protection.In terms of regulatory coordination,a"substance-over-form"approach is adopted through a"penetrative"review,supplemented by a"transaction purpose test",to distinguish financial assistance from other capital outflow activities such as related guarantees,in order to prevent and control the risks of financial assistance for limited liability companies.

马更新;赵桓

中国政法大学民商经济法学院商法所 北京 100088中国政法大学民商经济法学院

社会科学

财务资助有限责任公司代理成本偿债能力测试

financial assistancelimited liability companiesagency costsinsolvency test

《华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2026 (4)

43-60,18

国家社会科学基金后期资助项目"数据权益法律保护模式研究"(24FFXB061)

评论