卢卡奇对海德格尔批判的三重维度OACHSSCD
Lukacs's Three Dimensions of Heidegger's Criticism Based on the Interpretation of Existentialism or Marxism?
资本主义进入帝国主义时代后,虚无主义成为了一种真正的时代问题.对克服虚无主义问题的探讨引发了哲学界的思潮激荡,孕育了以存在主义还是马克思主义寻求解放之路的问答.在《存在主义还是马克思主义?》中,卢卡奇对海德格尔的存在主义进行了基于世界观、社会观、自由观三重维度的批判.他深刻总结并阐明了海德格尔主观唯心主义的谬误世界观、高度片面抽象化的缺憾社会观、非现实性解放的幻想自由观.由此,卢卡奇揭示了海德格尔式存在主义的理论局限,点明了存在主义作为解放道路的内在缺陷.这种批判探究了实现解放与自由的现实道路问题,回答了如何在马克思主义与存在主义间抉择的世纪之问.虽然存在一定的受制于时代的误读与局限,卢卡奇对海德格尔的批判仍能为探讨人类解放的现实问题提供有益的思想借鉴.
After capitalism entered the era of imperialism,nihilism became a genuine problem of the times.The exploration of overcoming nihilism stirred intense ideological trends in philosophical circles,giving rise to debates on whether to seek the path of liberation through existentialism or Marxism.In Existentialism or Marxism?,Lukacs criticized Heidegger's existen-tialism based on the three dimensions of worldview,social view and freedom view.He profoundly summa-rized and clarified Heidegger's false worldview of subjective idealism,highly one-sided and abstract view of imperfect society,and illusory freedom view of non-realistic liberation.Thus,Lukacs reveals the theo-retical limitations of Heidegger's existentialism and points out the inherent defects of existentialism as a road to liberation.This criticism explores the realistic road to liberation and freedom,and answers the century's question of how to choose between Marxism and existentialism.Although there are some misun-derstandings and limitations of the times,Lukacs'criticism of Heidegger can still provide useful ideolog-ical reference for exploring the practical problems of human liberation.
卢永欣;龚智明
广西大学马克思主义学院 广西 南宁 530004||中山大学马克思主义哲学与中国现代化研究所广西大学
社会科学
卢卡奇海德格尔马克思主义存在主义
Lukacsheideggermarxismexistentialism
《华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2026 (4)
1-11,21,12
评论