首页|期刊导航|高原气象|云南省极端降水多模式可预报性评估

云南省极端降水多模式可预报性评估OA

The predictability of extreme precipitation in Yunnan Province with multimodel ensemble forecasts

中文摘要英文摘要

极端降水常引发严重的人员伤亡和经济损失,提高其预报准确率意义重大.鉴于当前数值模式在预报业务中的核心地位,深入掌握模式性能是提高预报准确率的基础.本研究采用均方根误差(Root Mean Square Error,RMSE)、空间TS评分(Threat Score,TS)和空间相关系数(Correlation Coefficient,COR),评估交互式全球大集合预报系统(THORPEX Interactive Grand Global Ensemble,TIGGE)资料集下中国气象局(China Meteorological Administration,CMA)、美国国家环境预报中心(China Meteorologi-cal Administration,NCEP)、欧洲中期天气预报中心(European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Fore-casts,ECMWF)集合预报对2014-2024年云南发生的21次极端降水事件的可预报性.结果表明:总体上模式可预报性NCEP>ECMWF>CMA.集合90%分位值预报(ES90)和集合75%分位值预报(ES75)在3个模式中的可参考性均较高.进一步分析发现ES75(ES90)在降水量级(落区)方面具有更高的可预报性,其中ECMWF>NCEP>CMA.在预报与实况的空间协同性方面ES75优于ES90.对于中雨、大雨、暴雨和大暴雨落区,可预报性最高的分别是ECMWF-ES75、ECMWF-ES90、NCEP-ES90和CMA-ES90.不同模式的可预报性有明显的季节差异,冬季ECMWF可预报性最高,其他季节NCEP可预报性最高.不同系统影响下的极端降水事件可预报性也有一定差异,对于槽前降水型,ECMWF可预报性最高,对于其他影响系统型,NCEP的可预报性最高.进一步分析发现模式对极端降水事件的可预报性主要依赖于对影响系统的预报能力,对系统范围和位置的可预报性决定了雨带位置的可预报性,对系统强度和水汽输送的可预报性决定了降水量级的可预报性.模式对于大尺度系统影响下的降水预报效果要优于较小尺度系统.

Extreme precipitation often leads to severe casualties and economic losses,making advancements in its prediction critically important.Given the central role of numerical models in modern forecasting operations,a deep understanding of their performance is fundamental to improving forecast accuracy.This study employs the root mean square error(RMSE),spatial threat score(TS),and spatial correlation coefficient(COR)to evaluate the predictability of 21 extreme precipitation events in Yunnan from 2014 to 2024,using ensemble forecasts from the China Meteorological Administration(CMA),the National Centers for Environmental Prediction(NCEP),and the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts(ECMWF)within the TIGGE(THORPEX Inter-active Grand Global Ensemble)dataset.Overall predictability ranked as NCEP>ECMWF>CMA.The 90th and 75th percentile ensemble forecasts(ES90 and ES75)showed high reference value across models.ES75 dem-onstrated better skill for precipitation intensity,while ES90 performed better in spatial precipitation distribution,with ECMWF>NCEP>CMA in both cases.ES75 also exhibited superior spatial consistency with observations.For precipitation area forecasting,the most skillful combinations were:ECMWF-ES75 for moderate rain,ECMWF-ES90 for heavy rain,NCEP-ES90 for torrential rain,and CMA-ES90 for severe torrential rain.Sea-sonal variation was evident:ECMWF showed the highest predictability in winter,and NCEP in other seasons.Predictability also varied by influencing weather system-ECMWF performed best for pre-trough precipitation,while NCEP was superior for other system types.Model predictability for extreme precipitation primarily de-pended on the forecast skill of influencing systems.System spatial extent and location determined rainband pre-dictability,while system intensity and moisture transport governed precipitation magnitude predictability.Mod-els performed better for precipitation influenced by large-scale systems than by smaller-scale systems.

黎文懋;晏红明

云南省气候中心,云南 昆明 650034||云南大学 地球科学学院大气科学系,云南 昆明 650500云南省气候中心,云南 昆明 650034

天文与地球科学

极端降水事件集合预报模式评估TIGGE

extreme precipitation eventsensemble forecastmodel assessmentTIGGE

《高原气象》 2026 (4)

1044-1056,13

云南省气象局科技创新青年基金项目(QN202506)云南省气象局科研项目(YZ202508)云南省基础研究计划重大项目(202501BC070001)云南省自然科学重点基金项目(202201AS070069)云南省气象局基层台站气象科技创新与能力提升计划项目(STIAP202430)中国气象局创新发展专项(CXFZ2025Q011)

10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2025.00125

评论