首页|期刊导航|高原气象|三种再分析资料的气温在东昆仑山北部的适用性评估

三种再分析资料的气温在东昆仑山北部的适用性评估OA

Applicability evaluation for three reanalysis of temperature datasets over the northern part of the Eastern Kunlun Mountains

中文摘要英文摘要

为探究三种再分析资料(ERA5、JRA-55、MERRA-2)的气温在东昆仑山北部及不同分区的适用性,本文利用1980-2023年东昆仑山北部28个国家气象站逐日平均气温观测资料,采用气温直减率订正法对再分析资料的气温进行订正,并选取相关系数(CC)、平均偏差(MB)、均方根误差(RMSE)和平均绝对误差(MAE)共4项评价指标,结合气候倾向率法,分别从区域、站点尺度对年、季三种再分析资料的气温在东昆仑山北部及不同分区的适用性进行评估.结果表明:(1)双线性插值优于最邻近插值,经地形订正后,三种再分析资料的MB绝对值平均降低0.92~1.81℃,RMSE平均降低0.69~1.34℃.(2)地形订正后,三种再分析资料均能反映出研究区平均气温"东高西低、东北最低"的空间分布特征,但均存在部分高估.(3)区域尺度上,ERA5适用性最优,JRA-55次之,MERRA-2最差.仅ERA5春季气候倾向率高于观测,其余均偏低,增温特征均为"夏强冬弱".(4)站点尺度上,JRA-55适用性最优,ERA5次之,MERRA-2最差.观测资料、ERA5、JRA-55的年、季气候倾向率多集中在0.30~0.60℃·(10a)-1,MERRA-2则集中在0.15~0.30℃·(10a)-1;三种再分析资料气候倾向率大体上均低于观测,增温特征均为"夏强冬弱".(5)三种再分析资料在不同分区适用性各有侧重,ERA5、JRA-55和MERRA-2分别在东部农业区、环青海湖区、柴达木盆地适用性最好.三种再分析资料均能反映不同分区"夏强冬弱"的增温特征;观测资料显示增温趋势排序为东部农业区[同德、大通出现强增温,同德年和各季气候倾向率≥0.97℃·(10a)-1]>柴达木盆地(茫崖出现强增温)>环青海湖区,ERA5在环青海湖区和东部农业区增温趋势与观测资料更接近,表现最优;JRA-55次之;MERRA-2最差.(6)对于东昆仑山北部,区域气候分析应优先考虑ERA5,站点尺度的精细化研究应优先考虑JRA-55.

To evaluate the applicability of air temperature data from three reanalysis datasets(ERA5,JRA-55,and MERRA-2)in the northern part of the Eastern Kunlun Mountains and its different subregions,this study used daily mean temperature observations from 28 national meteorological stations in the northern part of the East Kunlun Mountains during 1980-2023.The air temperature data from the reanalysis datasets were corrected using a lapse-rate correction method.Four evaluation indicators,namely the correlation coefficient(CC),mean bias(MB),root mean square error(RMSE),and mean absolute error(MAE),together with the climatic tenden-cy rate,were used to assess the applicability of annual and seasonal air temperature from the three reanalysis da-tasets at regional and station scales.The results show that:(1)Bilinear interpolation outperformed nearest-neigh-bor interpolation.After lapse-rate correction,the mean absolute value of MB of the three reanalysis datasets de-creased by 0.92~1.81℃,and the RMSE decreased by 0.69~1.34℃.(2)After lapse-rate correction,all three reanalysis datasets reproduced the spatial distribution characteristics of mean air temperature in the study area,namely higher values in the east and lower values in the west,with the lowest values in the northeast,although overestimation occurred in some areas.(3)At the regional scale,ERA5 showed the best applicability.JRA-55 ranked second,while MERRA-2 showed the poorest applicability.Only the spring climatic tendency rate of ERA5 was higher than that of the observations;the remaining values were lower than the observed values.All three datasets showed a warming pattern characterized by stronger warming in summer and weaker warming in winter.(4)At the station scale,JRA-55 showed the best applicability.ERA5 ranked second,while MERRA-2 showed the poorest applicability.The annual and seasonal climatic tendency rates of the observations,ERA5,and JRA-55 were mostly concentrated within 0.30~0.60℃·(10a)-1,whereas those of MERRA-2 were mainly concentrated within 0.15~0.30℃·(10a)-1.Overall,the climatic tendency rates of the three reanalysis datasets were generally lower than those of the observations,and all exhibited a warming pattern of stronger warming in summer and weaker warming in winter.(5)The applicability of the three reanalysis datasets varied among differ-ent subregions.ERA5,JRA-55,and MERRA-2 performed best in the eastern agricultural region,the area around Qinghai Lake,and the Qaidam Basin,respectively.All three datasets captured the subregional warming pattern of stronger warming in summer and weaker warming in winter.The observations showed that the warm-ing trend was ranked as follows:eastern agricultural region,where strong warming occurred at Tongde and Da-tong and the annual and seasonal climatic tendency rates at Tongde were≥0.97℃·(10a)-1,followed by the Qa-idam Basin,where strong warming occurred at Mangya,and then the area around Qinghai Lake.ERA5 showed warming trends closer to the observations in the area around Qinghai Lake and the eastern agricultural region and thus performed the best,followed by JRA-55,while MERRA-2 showed the poorest applicability.(6)For the northern part of the Eastern Kunlun Mountains,ERA5 should be prioritized for regional climate analysis,where-as JRA-55 should be prioritized for refined studies at the station scale.

胡嘉玥;何清;袁淑杰;时一文

成都信息工程大学大气科学学院,四川 成都 610225中国气象局乌鲁木齐沙漠气象研究所 新疆塔克拉玛干沙漠气象国家野外科学观测研究站/中国气象局塔克拉玛干沙漠气象野外科学试验基地/新疆沙漠气象与沙尘暴重点实验室,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830002成都信息工程大学大气科学学院,四川 成都 610225成都信息工程大学大气科学学院,四川 成都 610225

天文与地球科学

东昆仑山北部ERA5JRA-55MERRA-2再分析资料评估

the northern part of the Eastern Kunlun MountainsERA5JRA-55MERRA-2reanalysis data evaluation

《高原气象》 2026 (4)

967-985,19

国家自然科学基金项目(42030612)第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究项目(2019QZKK010206)四川省2024年度科技计划项目(2024YFTX0016)宁夏自然科学基金项目(2023AAC02088)

10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2025.00128

评论