首页|期刊导航|肿瘤综合治疗电子杂志|乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗病理完全缓解与治疗前营养指标的相关性分析

乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗病理完全缓解与治疗前营养指标的相关性分析OA

Correlation analysis between pathological complete response and pretreatment nutritional indicators in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 分析新辅助化疗乳腺癌患者病理完全缓解(pathological complete response,pCR)与治疗前营养指标的相关性.方法 选取2021年1月至2025年1月首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院收治的100例接受新辅助化疗的乳腺癌患者,检测患者化疗前7 d营养指标,包括预后营养指数(prognostic nutritional index,PNI)、白蛋白(albumin,ALB)、体重指数(body mass index,BMI)、乳酸脱氢酶与白蛋白比值(lactate dehydrogenase to albumin ratio,LAR)、中性粒细胞与白蛋白比值(neutrophil to albumin ratio,NPAR)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio,NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(platelet to lymphocyte ratio,PLR)、淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值(lymphocyte to monocyte ratio,LMR)、全身免疫炎症指数(systemic immune-inflammation index,SII)等.按照术后病理结果,将达到pCR者纳入pCR组(n=28),将未达到pCR者纳入对照组(n=72).对比两组患者人口学特征、临床资料和治疗前营养指标,使用多因素Logistic回归分析乳腺癌患者新辅助治疗pCR未达到的影响因素,并使用受试者操作特征曲线(receiver operator characteristic curve,ROC 曲线)评价各指标预测效能.结果 术后病理反应评估结果显示,28例(28.00%)患者达到pCR.pCR组与对照组分子分型、Ki-67状态比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).pCR组患者化疗前LAR、NPAR、NLR、PLR、SII均显著低于对照组(均P<0.05),PNI、LMR均显著高于对照组(均P<0.05).多因素Logistic回归分析显示,PNI下降、NPAR升高、SII升高、Ki-67状态≥30%是乳腺癌患者新辅助治疗pCR未达成的独立危险因素(均P<0.05).ROC曲线显示,Ki-67状态预测患者达到pCR的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)为0.670,Ki-67状态联合PNI、NPAR、SII预测患者达到pCR的AUC为0.815.结论 乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后pCR率偏低,且受Ki-67状态和治疗前营养状态、炎症状态影响显著,上述指标联合能为pCR预测提供一定参考.

Objective To analyze the correlation between pathological complete response(pCR)and pretreatment nutritional indicators in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Method A total of 100 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy at Beijing Friendship Hospital,Capital Medical University from January 2021 to January 2025 were selected.Nutritional indicators were measured within 7 days before chemotherapy,including the prognostic nutritional index(PNI),albumin(ALB),body mass index(BMI),lactate dehydrogenase-to-albumin ratio(LAR),neutrophil-to-albumin ratio(NPAR),neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(NLR),platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio(PLR),lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio(LMR),and systemic immune-inflammation index(SII).Based on postoperative pathological results,patients who achieved pCR were assigned to the pCR group,while those who did not were assigned to the control group.Demographic characteristics,clinical data,and pretreatment nutritional indicators were compared between the two groups.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze factors influencing pCR,and the predictive performance of each indicator was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC curve).Result Postoperative pathological assessment showed that 28 patients(28.00%)achieved pCR.Significant differences were observed in molecular subtypes and Ki-67 status between the pCR and control groups(all P<0.05).The pCR group had significantly lower pretreatment LAR,NPAR,NLR,PLR,and SII,and higher PNI and LMR compared to the control group(all P<0.05).Multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that decreased PNI,elevated NPAR,elevated SII,and Ki-67≥30%were independent risk factors for failure to achieve pCR(all P<0.05).ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC for Ki-67 status in predicting pCR was 0.670,while the combination of Ki-67 with PNI,NPAR,and SII yielded an AUC of 0.815 for predicting pCR.Conclusion The pCR rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients is relatively low and is significantly influenced by Ki-67 status and pretreatment nutritional and inflammatory conditions.The combination of these indicators may provide valuable reference for predicting pCR.

门振;侯萌;董海月

首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院 门诊治疗室,北京 100050首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院 门诊治疗室,北京 100050首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院 门诊治疗室,北京 100050

新辅助化疗乳腺癌病理完全缓解营养指标影响因素

Neoadjuvant chemotherapyBreast cancerPathological complete responseNutritional indicatorsInfluencing factors

《肿瘤综合治疗电子杂志》 2026 (2)

71-76,6

10.12151/JMCM.2026.02-09

评论