KRAS突变亚型及共突变状态对晚期非鳞非小细胞肺癌疗效与生存的影响分析OA
Analysis of the effects of KRAS mutation subtypes and co-mutation status on efficacy and survival in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer
目的 探讨KRAS突变亚型及共突变状态对晚期非鳞非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)患者疗效及预后差异的影响,为临床个体化治疗提供依据.方法 回顾性分析2015-2025年中国人民解放军总医院3个医学中心114例KRAS突变晚期非鳞NSCLC患者,收集临床、基因检测及随访数据,疗效评估依据RECIST 1.1标准.采用Kaplan-Meier法计算中位无进展生存期(progression-free survival,PFS)和总生存期(overall survival,OS).结果 114例明确诊断KRAS突变亚型患者中男性占78.95%,Ⅳ期占92.98%;主要亚型为G12C(34.21%)、G12D(21.93%),G12C吸烟率最高(84.62%),G12D最低(56.00%).一线治疗中,免疫±化疗组中位PFS为10.50个月、中位OS为17.80个月;化疗+贝伐珠单抗组分别为6.63个月和19.10个月;免疫+化疗+贝伐珠单抗组分别为8.77个月和18.73个月,各组间差异无统计学意义.亚型分析:G12C组中位PFS 11.47个月、中位OS 21.48个月,G12D组分别为7.85个月、16.33个月,亚型间PFS差异无统计学意义,但G12C组在OS方面显示出生存获益趋势.共突变分析:TP53共突变中位PFS 8.67个月,中位OS 20.00个月,STK11共突变中位PFS 8.37个月,中位OS 13.07个月.KRAS合并TP53有生存获益趋势,但未达统计学差异,合并STK11则提示预后不良.结论 KRAS突变晚期非鳞NSCLC一线优选以免疫为基础的联合治疗,额外添加抗血管生成药物未能进一步提升疗效.传统化疗与免疫治疗背景下,除G12C外的KRAS突变亚型(G12D、G12V、G12A)对预后无显著有利影响,且均为独立不良预后因素.G12C亚型具有生存获益趋势.KRAS合并TP53突变呈生存获益趋势,合并STK11突变提示预后不良.临床决策应重点关注共突变状态、吸烟史,以及相关生物标志物,而非过度依赖KRAS突变亚型进行分层.
Objective To investigate the impact of different KRAS mutation subtypes and co-mutation status on the efficacy and prognosis in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC,aiming to optimize individualized clinical treatment strategies.Method A retrospective analysis was conducted on 114 patients with KRAS-mutated advanced non-squamous NSCLC admitted to three medical centers of Chinese PLA General Hospital from 2015 to 2025.Clinical data,genetic testing results and follow-up data were collected.Efficacy was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(RECIST)version 1.1.Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median progression-free survival(mPFS)and median overall survival(mOS).Result A total of 114 patients with confirmed KRAS mutation subtypes were enrolled,among whom males accounted for 78.95%and patients at stage Ⅳ accounted for 92.98%.The main subtypes were G12C(34.21%)and G12D(21.93%).The smoking rate was the highest in the G12C group(84.62%)and the lowest in the G12D group(56.00%).Among first-line treatments,the immunotherapy±chemotherapy group had a median PFS of 10.50 months and a median OS of 17.80 months;the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group had 6.63 months and 19.10 months,respectively;and the immunotherapy plus chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group had 8.77 months and 18.73 months,respectively,with no statistically significant differences among the groups.In terms of efficacy,the mPFS and mOS in the G12C group were 11.47 months and 21.48 months,respectively;those in the G12D group were 7.85 months and 16.33 months,respectively.There was no statistically significant difference in PFS between the different subtypes.Although the G12C group showed a numerical trend towards longer median OS compared to non-G12C patients,the difference was not statistically significant.Co-mutation analysis:mPFS in patients with TP53 co-mutation was 8.67 months,and mOS was 20.00 months.For patients with STK11 co-mutation,mPFS was 8.37 months and mOS was 13.07 months.KRAS co-mutated with TP53 showed a trend of survival benefit,but the difference was not statistically significant;whereas KRAS co-mutated with STK11 indicated poor prognosis.Conclusion For advanced non-squamous NSCLC with KRAS mutations,immunotherapy-based combination therapy is the preferred first-line treatment,and the addition of antiangiogenic agents does not further improve efficacy.In the context of conventional chemotherapy and immunotherapy,KRAS mutation subtypes other than G12C(G12D,G12V,G12A)have no significant favorable impact on prognosis and are independent unfavorable prognostic factors.The G12C subtype shows a trend toward survival benefit.KRAS co-mutated with TP53 shows a trend toward survival benefit,whereas KRAS co-mutated with STK11 indicates poor prognosis.Clinical decision-making should focus on biomarkers such as co-mutation status,PD-L1 expression level,and smoking history,rather than over-relying on KRAS mutation subtypes for stratification.
杜翔宇;张善鑫;吕雅晖;刘哲峰
中国人民解放军总医院第一医学中心 肿瘤内科,北京 100853中国人民解放军总医院第一医学中心 肿瘤内科,北京 100853中国人民解放军总医院第一医学中心 肿瘤内科,北京 100853中国人民解放军总医院第五医学中心肿瘤医学部 肿瘤内科,北京 100853
非鳞非小细胞肺癌KRAS突变突变亚型共突变
Non-squamous non-small cell lung cancerKRAS mutationMutation subtypeCo-mutation
《肿瘤综合治疗电子杂志》 2026 (2)
50-62,13
评论