首页|期刊导航|杂交水稻|不同产量分离方法在水稻产量预报上的对比分析

不同产量分离方法在水稻产量预报上的对比分析OA

Comparative Analysis of Different Yield Separation Methods in Rice Yield Forecasting:a Case Study of Xinyang City

中文摘要英文摘要

利用信阳市 1993-2021 年气象观测资料及水稻产量和生育期资料,对比分析 5 年滑动平均、3 年滑动平均、HP 滤波、二次指数平滑、ARIMA 模型、灰色预测模型 GM(1,1)等方法在信阳市水稻产量预报中的适用性.采用相关分析法确定影响信阳市水稻产量的关键气象因子,运用逐步回归法建立水稻产量预报模型,并利用预报模型对 1993-2021 年水稻产量进行回代检验,对 2022-2023 年水稻产量进行预报检验,采用准确率、泰勒图 2 种检验方法评估分析不同产量分离方法所得的预报方程在信阳市水稻产量预报中的效果.结果表明,影响信阳市水稻产量的关键气象因子主要为 7 月下旬日照时数、7 月下旬平均气温和 7 月下旬降水量;6 种模型的多年平均回代检验准确率为 90.2%~94.5%,其中 HP 滤波和 5 年滑动平均的准确率较高,分别为 94.5%、94.4%;6 种模型的多年平均预报准确率为 89.2%~98.8%,其中预报准确率较高的 2 种方法分别为二次指数平滑(98.8%)、ARIMA 模型(96.5%).

Utilizing meteorological observation data and rice yield and growth stage data of Xinyang City from 1993 to 2021,this study compared and analyzed the applicability of five-year sliding average,three-year sliding average,HP filtering,double exponential smoothing,ARIMA model,and grey prediction model GM(1,1)in forecasting rice yield in Xinyang City.The correlation analysis was performed to determine the key meteorological factors affecting rice yield in Xinyang City.A rice yield forecasting model was established based on the stepwise regression method.The forecasting models were then used to conduct back testing on rice yields from 1993 to 2021 and forecasting tests on rice yields from 2022 to 2023.Two testing methods,namely accuracy rate and Taylor plot,were employed to evaluate and analyze the effects of forecasting equations based on different yield separation methods in rice yield forecasting in Xinyang City.The results showed that the key meteorological factors affecting rice yield in Xinyang City were sunshine duration in late July,average temperature in late July,and precipitation in late July.The multi-year average back-testing accuracy rates of six models ranged from 90.2%to 94.5%.Among them,HP filtering and five-year sliding average demonstrated higher accuracy rates of 94.5%and 94.4%,respectively.The multi-year average forecasting accuracy rates of six models ranged from 89.2%to 98.8%,and the two methods with higher forecasting accuracy rates were double exponential smoothing(98.8%)and ARIMA model(96.5%).

方彤;庄若南;胡莉婷

信阳市茶叶气象重点实验室/信阳市气象局,河南 信阳 464000信阳市茶叶气象重点实验室/信阳市气象局,河南 信阳 464000河南省气象科学研究所,河南 郑州 450003||中国气象局/河南省农业气象保障与应用技术重点开放实验室,河南 郑州 450003

农业科技

水稻产量预报HP滤波滑动平均二次指数平滑ARIMA模型灰色预测模型

riceyield forecastingHP filteringsliding averagedouble exponential smoothingARIMA modelgrey prediction model

《杂交水稻》 2026 (4)

42-52,11

信阳市茶叶气象重点实验室科研基金(XYYB-202404)

10.16267/j.cnki.1005-3956.20241217.287

评论