肝硬化并发重度GOV型食管胃静脉曲张内镜下不同治疗方式疗效评价OA
Evaluation of therapeutic effect of different endoscopic treatments for severe GOV type esophagogastric varices in cirrhosis
目的 比较内镜下不同治疗方式治疗肝硬化并发重度GOV型食管胃静脉曲张的临床疗效.方法 回顾性分析2018年1月至2023年12月期间延安大学附属医院消化内科收治的159例肝硬化并发重度GOV型食管胃静脉曲张患者临床资料,依据内镜下治疗方式分为单纯套扎组(A组,n=33),组织胶联合套扎组(B组,n=70),组织胶联合硬化组(C组,n=56),对比3组患者首次治疗后疗效、并发症情况、治疗前后实验室及影像学指标、静脉曲张完全消除时累计治疗次数、复发率及复发时间等指标.结果 首次治疗后显效率比较,B组(84.3%)和C组(85.7%)均高于A组(60.6%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.016);首次治疗后1个月并发症比较,3组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);累计治疗次数比较,A组[4(3,5)]大于B组[3(2,4)]和C组[3(3,4)],差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);复发率比较,3组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);复发时间比较,A组(14.50±2.35)个月短于B组(18.00±1.87)个月和C组(16.60±1.65)个月,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);B组和C组之间首次治疗后显效率、累计治疗次数、复发时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 组织胶联合套扎组与组织胶联合硬化组的临床疗效均优于单纯套扎组,具体表现为首次治疗显效率提升、累计治疗次数减少及复发时间显著延迟.
Objective Comparing the clinical efficacy of different endoscopic treatment modalities for severe GOV type esophagogastric varices in cirrhosis.Methods Retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 159 patients with severe GOV varicose veins in liver cirrhosis admitted to the department of gastroenterology of the Affiliated Hospital of Yan'an University from Jan.2018 to Dec.2023.Based on the endoscopic treatment modality,they were divided into group A(n=33),group B(n=70),and group C(n=56).Group A was the simple ligation group,group B was the tissue adhesive combined ligation group,and group C was the tissue adhesive combined sclerotherapy group.The three groups of patients were compared in terms of apparent efficiency of the first treatment,complications,laboratory and imaging indexes before and after treatment,the cumulative number of treatments at the time of complete elimination of varicose veins,recurrence rate and recurrence time.Results Comparison of the apparent efficiency of the first treatment showed that Group B(84.3%)and Group C(85.7%)were significantly higher than Group A(60.6%),with statistically significant differences(P<0.016);comparison of complications one month after the first treatment showed no statistically significant differences among the three groups(P>0.05);the cumulative number of treatments was higher in Group A[4(3,5)]than in Groups B[3(2,4)]and C[3(3,4)],with statistically significant differences(P<0.05);there were no statistically significant differences in recurrence rates among the three groups(P>0.05);comparison of recurrence time showed that Group A[(14.50±2.35)months]was shorter than Groups B[(18.00±1.87)months]and C[(16.60±1.65)months],with statistically significant differences(P<0.05);there were no statistically significant differences between Groups B and C in terms of the apparent efficiency of the first treatment,cumulative number of treatments,or recurrence time(P>0.05).Conclusion The clinical efficacy of the tissue adhesive combined ligation group and the tissue adhesive combined sclerotherapy group is superior to that of the simple ligation group,as evidenced by an increase in the apparent efficiency of the first treatment,a reduction in the cumulative number of treatments and a significant delay in the time to relapse.
葛彪;吕园静;韩文
延安大学附属医院消化内科,陕西延安 716000延安大学附属医院消化内科,陕西延安 716000||延安大学医学院,陕西延安 716000延安大学附属医院消化内科,陕西延安 716000
医药卫生
肝硬化GOV型食管胃静脉曲张内镜下治疗疗效对比
cirrhosisGOV type esophagogastric varicesendoscopic treatmentcomparison of curative effect
《中国实用内科杂志》 2026 (7)
564-570,7
延安市肝硬化食管胃静脉曲张无创筛查、干预及慢病管理科技创新团队食管胃底静脉曲张内镜下精准治疗(ESVD)临床应用研究(2018C010)
评论