首页|期刊导航|中国临床药理学杂志|2025年某医院耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染监测分析

2025年某医院耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染监测分析OA

Targeted surveillance analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in a tertiary hospital in 2025

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 通过监测2025年我院耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)医院感染发生情况,掌握其流行现状及传播风险,指导临床落实精准隔离与抗菌药物管控措施.方法 收集2025年本院的MRSA分离株和对应患者的病例资料,用Autof MS600全自动微生物质谱鉴定仪及VITEK2-compact微生物鉴定药敏分析仪对细菌进行鉴定检测药物敏感性指标,按2026版美国临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)文件标准判读结果.将MRSA感染者分为试验组和对照组.试验组纳入医院获得性(HA)感染患者,对照组纳入社区获得性(CA)感染患者,比较2组患者的人群分布、标本来源、标本构成和耐药差异.结果 MRSA感染检出率为24.64%(138例/560例),共纳入138例MRSA感染患者,其中试验组75例、75株,对照组63例、63株.男性检出MRSA较多,占63.77%;18岁~<65岁的中年人是MRSA主要检出人群,占47.83%,MRSA以感染呼吸系统占比最高,为44.20%(61株/138株),总体药敏试验显示:所有分离的MRSA菌株对替加环素、替考拉宁、万古霉素、头孢洛林和利奈唑胺均敏感,试验组与对照组菌株对左氧氟沙星的耐药率分别为34.67%(26株/75株)和11.11%(7株/63株),在统计学上差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).在不同的标本中对照组与试验组菌株的耐药率也不尽相同:在脓液标本中,对照组菌株对克林霉素耐药率达100.00%(19 株/19 株),显著高于试验组的 79.17%(19 株/24 株)(P<0.05),试验组中的MRSA对环丙沙星的耐药率为41.67%(10株/24株)显著高于对照组的5.26%(1株/19株)(P<0.05);痰液标本中,试验组中的MRSA对左氧氟沙星的耐药率为36.67%(11株/30株),显著高于对照组的9.68%(3株/31株)(P<0.05).结论 HA-MRSA与CA-MRSA对部分喹诺酮类及林可霉素类药物的耐药率存在差异,这对感染MRSA患者的管理策略具有重要临床意义,因此应根据当地医院耐药情况加强抗生素的合理使用,通过实施适当的感染控制政策,控制对金黄色葡萄球菌的药物选择性压力,同时尽量减少其暴露的危险因素.

Objective To monitor the nosocomial infection status of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA)in our hospital in 2025,clarify its epidemiological characteristics and transmission risks,and provide evidence for targeted isolation strategies and standardized antimicrobial administration in clinical practice.Methods MRSA isolates and corresponding clinical data of infected patients were collected from our hospital in 2025.Bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed using the Autof MS600 automatic microbial mass spectrometry identification system and VITEK2-compact microbial identification and drug susceptibility analyzer.The interpretation of susceptibility results was conducted in accordance with the 2026 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute(CLSI)guidelines.MRSA-infected patients were divided into the treatment group and the control group.The treatment group included patients with hospital-acquired infections(HA),while the control group included patients with community-acquired infections(CA).The two groups were compared in terms of population distribution,specimen sources,specimen composition and antimicrobial resistance profiles.Results The overall detection rate of MRSA infection was 24.64%(138 cases/560 cases).A total of 138 patients with MRSA infection were enrolled in the study,including 75 patients with 75 MRSA strains in the treatment group and 63 patients with 63 MRSA strains in the control group.Stratified analysis showed that MRSA detection was more common in males,accounting for 63.77%of all cases.Adults aged 18 to 65 years were the dominant population with MRSA infection,occupying 47.83%of the total cases.Respiratory system infection was the most common infection site of MRSA,with a proportion of 44.20%(61 strains/138 strains).General antimicrobial susceptibility results indicated that all MRSA isolates were completely susceptible to tigecycline,teicoplanin,vancomycin,ceftaroline and linezolid.The resistance rates of MRSA isolates to levofloxacin in the treatment group and control group were 34.67%(26 strains/75 strains)and 11.11%(7 strains/63 strains),respectively,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Subgroup analysis based on specimen types revealed significant differences in resistance rates between the two groups.In pus specimens,the clindamycin resistance rate of isolates in the control group was 100.00%(19 strains/19 strains),which was significantly higher than 79.17%(19 strains/24 strains)in the treatment group(P<0.05).For ciprofloxacin,the resistance rate of MRSA isolates in the treatment group was 41.67%(10 strains/24 strains),which was markedly higher than 5.26%(1 strains/19 strains)in the control group(P<0.05).In sputum specimens,the levofloxacin resistance rate of MRSA isolates in the treatment group was 36.67%(11 strains/30 strains),significantly higher than 9.68%(3 strains/31 strains)in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Significant differences in the resistance rates to partial quinolones and lincosamides exist between HA-MRSA and CA-MRSA strains.These findings have important clinical implications for the management of patients with MRSA infection.It is necessary to optimize antimicrobial stewardship based on local antimicrobial resistance surveillance data,implement standardized infection control policies,reduce the selective pressure of antibiotics on Staphylococcus aureus,and minimize the risk factors associated with MRSA infection and transmission

池水晶;唐冠杰;刘金霞;池红井;刘新儒

承德医学院附属医院 感染控制处,河北承德 067000承德医学院附属医院 外一科,河北承德 067000承德医学院,河北承德 067000承德市医学健康服务中心,河北承德 067000承德市疾病预防控制中心/承德市卫生监督所,河北承德 067000

医药卫生

耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌细菌耐药性社区感染医院感染防控

methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusbacterial antimicrobial resistancecommunity-acquired infectionhealthcare-associated infectionprevention and control

《中国临床药理学杂志》 2026 (13)

1801-1806,6

国家自然科学基金资助项目(22072127)河北省政府资助临床医学优秀人才培养项目基金资助项目(ZF2026379)河北省医学科学研究课题计划资助项目基金资助项目(20220420)2025年校级教育教学改革研究与实践课题基金资助项目(Y2025018)

10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2026.13.001

评论