美国海上无人装备演进及其对全球发展路径分化的启示OA
Evolution of U.S.maritime unmanned systems and their implications for the divergence of global development pathways
为应对分布式海上作战转型需求,美国正加速构建以无人系统为核心的新质作战力量,但各国发展路径存在显著差异.本文以美国为主,结合乌克兰、以色列、伊朗等国家的实践进行比较分析.首先,基于美国无人水面舰艇(USV)与无人潜航器(UUV)的发展历程、分级特征与典型作战场景,从任务特征视角出发,构建涵盖环境复杂度、任务复杂度和人机交互程度的三维自主等级评估框架,揭示无人装备"尺寸-任务-自主等级"的内在耦合规律,并从消耗性、指挥控制、机敏性、人机协同及研制理念 5 个维度辨析海上有人与无人装备的核心差异.然后,运用该框架分析各国无人装备的发展态势,归纳出高端体系化与低成本规模两条主导路径,提出二者融合的复合发展模式.最后,结合我国战略定位提出路径选择、通信智能、自主规划与攻防协同方面的启示,并对未来发展趋势进行展望,为我国海上无人装备的体系化建设与战斗力生成提供理论参考.
To meet the transformational requirements of distributed maritime operations,the United States is accelerating the development of new combat capabilities centered on unmanned systems.However,the devel-opment pathways of maritime unmanned systems differ significantly across countries and regions.These dif-ferences are reflected not only in platform selection and technical configurations,but also in operational con-cepts,capability-generation models,and approaches to integrating unmanned systems into maritime forces.Fo-cusing primarily on the United States,and incorporating the practical experience of Ukraine,Israel,Iran,and other countries,this paper conducts a comparative analysis of the evolution of maritime unmanned systems and the divergence of development pathways worldwide.First,based on the development history,classifica-tion characteristics,and typical operational scenarios of U.S.unmanned surface vehicles(USVs)and un-manned underwater vehicles(UUVs),this paper constructs a three-dimensional autonomy assessment frame-work from the perspective of mission characteristics.The framework comprises environmental complexity,mission complexity,and the degree of human-machine interaction.Environmental complexity reflects the ex-ternal conditions under which unmanned systems operate;mission complexity characterizes the difficulty and diversity of operational tasks;and the degree of human-machine interaction describes the extent of human in-volvement in supervision,decision-making,and control.Through this framework,the paper reveals the intrin-sic coupling relationship among the size,mission profile,and autonomy level of unmanned maritime systems.Specifically,platform size is closely associated with mission scope,operational employment,and the level of autonomy required for effective mission execution.On this basis,the paper further analyzes the fundamental differences between manned and unmanned maritime systems from five dimensions:expendability,command and control,agility,human-machine teaming,and development philosophy.The framework is then applied to examine the development trends of unmanned maritime systems across different countries.The analysis identi-fies two dominant development pathways:a high-end,system-oriented pathway and a low-cost,mass-oriented pathway.The former emphasizes advanced capabilities,system integration,and a high degree of operational coordination,whereas the latter focuses on affordability,quantity,and scalable employment.Based on these findings,the paper proposes a hybrid development model that integrates the advantages of both pathways and reflects the potential convergence of future development trends.Finally,in light of China's strategic position-ing and maritime security requirements,this paper discusses implications for pathway selection,intelligent communications,autonomous mission planning,and coordinated offensive and defensive operations.Future development trends are also examined from the perspective of system development and operational capability generation.The findings provide a theoretical reference for the systematic development of China's maritime unmanned systems and the generation of operational capabilities.
王毓清;宋利飞;陈侯京;李晓彬
高性能船舶技术教育部重点实验室(武汉理工大学),湖北 武汉 430063||武汉理工大学 船海与能源动力工程学院,湖北 武汉 430063高性能船舶技术教育部重点实验室(武汉理工大学),湖北 武汉 430063||武汉理工大学 船海与能源动力工程学院,湖北 武汉 430063武汉理工大学 船海与能源动力工程学院,湖北 武汉 430063||中国舰船研究设计中心,湖北 武汉 430064高性能船舶技术教育部重点实验室(武汉理工大学),湖北 武汉 430063||武汉理工大学 船海与能源动力工程学院,湖北 武汉 430063
交通工程
海上无人装备分布式海上作战无人艇无人潜航器发展路径分化战略规划
maritime unmanned systemsdistributed maritime operationsunmanned vehiclesunmanned underwater vehiclepathway divergencestrategic planning
《中国舰船研究》 2026 (4)
84-96,13
评论