致密砂岩储层成岩相类型及其孔隙度演化定量分析OA
Diagenetic facies types and quantitative analysis of porosity evolution in tight sandstone reservoirs:a case study of the Chang 6 Member of the Triassic Yanchang Formation in the X255 area,Ordos Basin
为明确致密砂岩储层孔隙差异演化特征,以鄂尔多斯盆地X255地区三叠系延长组长6段为例,综合运用铸体薄片、扫描电镜、XRD黏土矿物分析和阴极发光等资料,划分致密砂岩储层成岩相类型,建立不同成岩相类型的成岩演化序列;结合埋藏史与热史模拟恢复,定量计算不同成岩相储层在关键地质历史时期的孔隙度,明确其差异性演化规律.结果表明,研究区长6段储层主要发育中压实长石溶蚀相、中压实绿泥石胶结相、强压实致密相和中压实碳酸盐胶结相4种成岩相,其孔隙度演化过程具有明显差异.其中,中压实长石溶蚀相在早成岩A期,压实和胶结作用共损失了 20.21%的孔隙度,早成岩阶段溶蚀作用增加了6.06%的孔隙度,早成岩B期及中成岩阶段孔隙度损失了 11.38%,最终孔隙度为11.85%,为优质成岩相;中压实绿泥石胶结相的压实和胶结作用分别损失了 16.45%和14.0%的孔隙度,溶蚀增孔3.15%,绿泥石薄膜对原始孔隙有一定的保护作用,是次一级优质成岩相;强压实致密相在压实作用下损失了 27.61%的孔隙度,胶结作用损失了 2.70%的孔隙度,为不利成岩相;中压实碳酸盐胶结相白云石沉淀占据约10.0%的孔隙空间,随后的压实和以方解石为主的胶结作用使储层在早成岩阶段即变得致密,为最不利的成岩相类型.
To clarify the differential evolution of porosity in tight sandstone reservoirs,the Chang 6 Member of the Triassic Yanchang Formation in the X255 area,Ordos Basin,was selected as a case study.Cast thin sections,scanning electron microscopy,X-ray diffraction(XRD)analysis of clay minerals,and cathodoluminescence data were integrated to classify the diagenetic facies of the tight sandstone reservoirs and establish the diagenetic evo-lution sequence of each facies.Burial and thermal histories were reconstructed,and the porosity of reservoirs with different diagenetic facies at key stages of geological history was quantitatively calculated to determine their differential evolution patterns.As indicated by the research results,four diagenetic facies are mainly developed in the Chang 6 member reservoirs in the study area:moderate-compaction feldspar-dissolution facies,moderate-compaction chlorite-cementation facies,strong-compaction tight facies,and moderate-compaction carbonate-cementation facies.Their porosity evolution processes differ markedly.In the moderate-compaction feldspar-dissolution facies,com-paction and cementation caused a combined porosity loss of 20.21%during early diagenetic stage A.Dissolution increased porosity by 6.06%during early diagenesis,whereas a further porosity loss of 11.38%occurred during early diagenetic stage B and the mesodiagenetic stage.The final porosity is 11.85%,making this a favorable dia-genetic facies.In the moderate-compaction chlorite-cementation facies,compaction and cementation caused porosity losses of 16.45%and 14.0%,respectively,whereas dissolution increased porosity by 3.15%.Chlorite coatings provided some protection for primary pores,making this the second most favorable diagenetic facies.In the strong-compaction tight facies,compaction and cementation caused porosity losses of 27.61%and 2.70%,respectively,making this an unfavorable diagenetic facies.In the moderate-compaction carbonate-cementation facies,dolomite precipitation occupied approximately 10.0%of the pore space.Subsequent compaction and calcite-dominated cementation rendered the reservoir tight during early diagenesis,making this the least favorable diagenetic facies.
张文;张凤奇;李程善;胥中义;张栋梁;茹荣;郭圆圆
西安石油大学地球科学与工程学院,陕西西安 710065||西安石油大学陕西省油气成藏地质学重点实验室,陕西西安 710065||西安石油大学油气资源智能地球物理探测陕西省高等学校重点实验室,陕西西安 710065西安石油大学地球科学与工程学院,陕西西安 710065||西安石油大学陕西省油气成藏地质学重点实验室,陕西西安 710065||西安石油大学油气资源智能地球物理探测陕西省高等学校重点实验室,陕西西安 710065中国石油长庆油田分公司勘探事业部,陕西西安 710000中国石油长庆油田分公司第九采油厂,宁夏银川 750006中国石油长庆油田分公司第九采油厂,宁夏银川 750006西安石油大学地球科学与工程学院,陕西西安 710065||西安石油大学陕西省油气成藏地质学重点实验室,陕西西安 710065||西安石油大学油气资源智能地球物理探测陕西省高等学校重点实验室,陕西西安 710065西安石油大学地球科学与工程学院,陕西西安 710065||西安石油大学陕西省油气成藏地质学重点实验室,陕西西安 710065||西安石油大学油气资源智能地球物理探测陕西省高等学校重点实验室,陕西西安 710065
能源科技
成岩相孔隙演化致密砂岩储层延长组鄂尔多斯盆地
diagenetic faciesporosity evolutiontight sandstone reservoirYanchang FormationOrdos Basin
《石油实验地质》 2026 (4)
795-809,15
陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目(2017JM4004),陕西省教育厅重点实验室科研计划项目(17JS110)和中国石油长庆油田分公司科学研究与技术开发项目(2023DM1012)联合资助.
评论