美国新近标准战略重塑国际标准竞争格局的动向逻辑、影响评估与因应策略OACHSSCD
The Logic,Impact Assessment,and Response Strategies of the United States'Recent Standards Strategy in Reshaping the International Standard Competition Landscape
[目的]美国新近修订标准战略对其标准体系进行结构性重构,系统研究该战略的动向趋势及对国家间产业竞争乃至国际标准治理体系产生的潜在影响并提出系统性应对策略.[方法]综合运用政策分析与战略研究方法,从战略定位、价值逻辑以及运行机制多方面评估其动向趋势,构建涵盖标准制定、产业竞争以及全球治理体系多层次的外溢影响评估框架,进而思考从宏观国际治理,到中观产业发展,再到微观标准机制层面的启示与因应策略.[结果/结论]美国本次标准战略更新呈现竞争强化与安全嵌入并行特征,标准体系正由传统技术协调工具逐步升级为支撑国家竞争力与规则主导权的重要制度基础.本次战略侧重转向会加剧关键技术领域规则竞争、技术路径锁定与全球治理体系阵营化、碎片化风险.为构建更为系统化、更具前瞻性的标准治理体系,未来应在宏观层面提升国际标准制定参与能力,增强制度韧性与战略主动性;在中观层面强化关键技术领域标准布局,推动标准与产业政策协同发展;在微观层面完善标准预研机制,加强标准与知识产权协同治理.
[Purpose]The United States has recently revised its standards strategy to structurally reorganize its standards system.This study systematically analyzes the trends of the strategy and its potential impact on industrial competition between countries and even the interna-tional standard governance system,and puts forward systematic countermeasures.[Method]Employing a combination of policy analysis and strategic research methodologies,this study evaluates the strategy's trajectory from multiple dimensions:strategic positioning,value logic,and operational mechanisms.It constructs a multi-level spillover impact assessment framework encompassing standard-setting,in-dustrial competition,and global governance systems.This framework informs insights and response strategies across three levels:macro-level international governance,meso-level industrial development,and micro-level standard mechanisms.[Result/Conclusion]The up-dated U.S.standards strategy exhibits parallel characteristics of intensified competition and security integration.The standards system is e-volving from a traditional technical coordination tool into a critical institutional foundation supporting national competitiveness and rule-set-ting dominance.This strategic pivot will exacerbate risks of rule competition in key technology sectors,technological path lock-in,and the fragmentation and bloc-based polarization of the global governance system.To build a more systematic and forward-looking standard governance framework,future efforts should:enhance international standards participation capacity,institutional resilience and strategic in-itiative at the macro level;strengthen the standardization framework in critical technology sectors and promote synergy between standards and industrial policies at the meso level;and improve pre-research mechanisms for standards while strengthening coordinated governance of standards and intellectual property at the micro level.
郑文龙
复旦大学法学院 上海 200438||马克斯·普朗克比较公法与国际法研究所 海德堡 69120
社会科学
标准战略技术竞争国家安全国际标准治理知识产权标准预研
standard strategytechnological competitionnational securityinternational standard governanceintellectual propertypre-standardization
《情报杂志》 2026 (8)
67-74,83,9
国家社会科学基金重点项目"中国深度参与全球数据知识产权治理的机制、路径与政策研究"(编号:25AZD042)复旦大学文科博士生访学资助项目(编号:HSS202508)研究成果.
评论