首页|期刊导航|临床输血与检验|中美输血医学学科人才培养体系的差异与思考

中美输血医学学科人才培养体系的差异与思考OA

Differences and Considerations on the Talent Training System of Transfusion Medicine:A China-US Comparison

中文摘要英文摘要

输血医学作为临床医学二级学科,其人才培养体系的完善对于保障临床用血安全、推动学科发展具有重要意义.本文系统比较了中美两国在输血医学学科发展、人才培养目标、课程体系、培养模式、职业发展及评价认证机制等方面的差异.结合2025年3月中国输血协会工作会议提出的"输血科向治疗型平台转型"及"输血医师专培体系启动"等最新政策导向,立足我国国情,提出中国输血医学人才培养体系优化路径,为学科建设和教育改革提供参考.

Transfusion medicine,as a secondary discipline of clinical medicine,requires a well-established talent training system to ensure clinical blood transfusion safety and promote disciplinary development.This paper systematically compares the differences between China and the United States in areas such as disciplinary development,talent training objectives,curriculum systems,teaching models,career development and evaluation and accreditation mechanisms in transfusion medicine.Incorporating the latest policy directions proposed at the Working Conference of the Chinese Society of Blood Transfusion held in March 2025—including the transformation of transfusion departments into therapeutic platforms and the initiation of a specialized training system for transfusion physicians—and based on China's national conditions,this paper proposes optimized pathways for the talent training system in transfusion medicine,aiming to provide references for disciplinary construction and educational reform.

姜晓星;戴健敏;刘君;蔡晓红

上海交通大学医学院医学技术学院,上海 200025上海交通大学医学院医学技术学院,上海 200025麻省总医院百翰医疗体系,波士顿,马萨诸塞州 02115,美国上海交通大学医学院医学技术学院,上海 200025||上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院临床输血科,上海 200025

医药卫生

输血医学人才培养中美比较专培体系

Transfusion medicineTalent trainingChina-US comparisonSpecialized training system

《临床输血与检验》 2026 (4)

457-466,10

本项目受2025年上海交通大学医学院本科核心课程建设项目《临床输血学和输血学检验》资助

10.3969/j.issn.1671-2587.2026.04.001

评论