颅内压联合脑氧监测技术辅助治疗颅脑创伤患者的Meta分析OA
Meta-analysis of intracranial pressure combined with cerebral oxygen monitoring in the treatment of traumatic brain injury patients
目的 系统评价颅内压(ICP)联合脑氧监测技术对比单纯 ICP 监测对颅脑创伤(TBI)患者预后的影响.方法 计算机检索 Cochrane Library、Embase、PubMed、中国知网、万方及维普数据库,收集比较 ICP联合脑氧监测(联合组)与单纯 ICP 监测(对照组)的随机对照试验(RCT)和队列研究.主要结局指标包括平均ICP/d、平均CPP/d、总住院时间、出院格拉斯哥昏迷指数(GCS)评分及死亡率.采用RevMan 5.3 进行Meta分析,异质性检验采用 I2 统计量,以 P<0.05 认为差异具有统计学意义.结果 本研究共纳入 12 项研究(5项 RCT 和7 项队列研究),共1 890 例TBI 患者.Meta 分析结果显示,联合组与对照组平均每日ICP 值(MD=0.95,95%CI=-1.22~3.13,P=0.390)、平均每日 CPP 值(MD=-1.49,95%CI=-4.31~1.32,P=0.300)、总住院时间(MD=-1.77,95%CI=-4.50~0.96,P=0.200)和出院 GCS 评分(MD=-0.16,95%CI=-0.87~0.55,P=0.670)差异均无统计学意义;联合组的总体死亡率高于对照组(OR=1.50,95%CI=1.01~2.23,P=0.040),敏感性分析发现个别研究可能是异质性的主要来源,剔除后联合组的死亡率仍较高,差异具有统计学意义(OR=1.58,95%CI=1.21~2.06,P=0.001).发表偏倚评估显示各研究间无明显偏倚.结论 当前证据表明,以 PbtO2 为主的 ICP 联合脑氧监测在改善重型 TBI 为主患者的短期 ICP 控制、CPP 优化、住院时间及出院神经功能恢复方面,未显示出显著优于单纯 ICP 监测的效果;合并分析显示联合组短期死亡率更高,但受研究异质性和混杂因素影响,暂无法确定其为联合监测的直接作用,联合监测与 TBI 患者死亡风险的关联仍需验证.
Objective To systematically evaluate the impact of intracranial pressure(ICP)combined with cerebral oxygen monitoring versus ICP monitoring alone on the prognosis of traumatic brain injury(TBI)patients.Methods This study searched the Cochrane Library,Embase,PubMed,CNKI,Wanfang,and VIP databases for randomized controlled trials(RCTs)and cohort studies comparing ICP combined with cerebral oxygen monitoring(combined group)versus ICP monitoring alone(control group).Primary outcome measures included mean ICP/day,mean CPP/day,total hospital stay,discharge Glasgow coma scale(GCS)score,and mortality.Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3,with heterogeneity assessed by the I2 statistic.A P-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results A total of 12 studies(5 RCTs and 7 cohort studies)involving 1 890 TBI patients were included.Meta-analysis showed no significant differences between the combined and control groups in mean daily ICP(MD=0.95,95%CI=-1.22-3.13,P=0.390),mean daily CPP(MD=-1.49,95%CI=-4.31-1.32,P=0.300),total hospital stay(MD=-1.77,95%CI=-4.50-0.96,P=0.200),or discharge GCS score(MD=-0.16,95%CI=-0.87-0.55,P=0.670).However,the combined group had a significantly higher overall mortality rate(OR=1.50,95%CI=1.01-2.23,P=0.040).Sensitivity analysis indicated that individual studies might be the primary source of heterogeneity,and after exclusion,the combined group still showed significantly higher mortality(OR=1.58,95%CI=1.21-2.06,P=0.001).Publication bias assessment revealed no significant bias among studies.Conclusions Current evidence suggests that ICP monitoring combined with brain oxygenation monitoring,primarily guided by PbtO2,shows no significant advantage over ICP monitoring alone in improving short-term ICP control,CPP optimization,length of hospital stay,and neurological recovery at discharge among patients mainly with severe TBI.Pooled analysis indicates a higher short-term mortality rate in the combined monitoring group.However,due to the influence of study heterogeneity and confounding factors,it cannot yet be confirmed as a direct effect of combined monitoring.The association between combined monitoring and the risk of mortality in TBI patients remains to be verified.
尹朱丹;王昱;许彬;镇坷;岳震
210009 南京,南京医科大学第一附属医院神经外科ICU210009 南京,南京医科大学第一附属医院神经外科ICU210009 南京,南京医科大学第一附属医院神经外科ICU210009 南京,南京医科大学第一附属医院神经外科ICU210009 南京,南京医科大学第一附属医院神经外科ICU
医药卫生
颅脑创伤颅内压脑氧监测Meta预后
traumatic brain injuryintracranial pressurecerebral oxygen monitoringmeta-analysisprognosis
《临床神经外科杂志》 2026 (4)
392-399,405,9
南京医科大学第一附属医院医学交叉转化基金项目(RG202410)南京医科大学第一附属医院临床能力提升项目(JSPH-MC-2023-21)江苏省科教能力提升工程项目(ZDXK202225)
评论