首页|期刊导航|科学与管理|技术平权视角下适应新业态发展的新型监管方式研究

技术平权视角下适应新业态发展的新型监管方式研究OACHSSCD

A Study on New Regulatory Approaches Adapting to the Development of New Business Formats from the Perspective of Technological Empowerment:Taking the New Energy Vehicle Industry as an Example

中文摘要英文摘要

技术平权是新兴产业发展的本质特征,"十五五"规划纲要针对新兴产业首次提出沙盒监管、触发式监管,便是对于技术平权趋势下监管张力的初步回应.从技术平权视角出发,融合规制经济学、技术社会学与演化经济学的分析方法,以新能源汽车行业为场景,探究新业态监管失灵的深层机理与新型监管构建路径.研究发现:技术平权通过降低操作门槛与成本价格,引发需求侧风险泛化与责任悬空、供给侧福利溢出与创新损耗交织的"双侧外部性"困境.因此构建"技术平权-外部性治理-监管适配"理论模型,提出新型监管应以"准入宽松化、监管柔性化、治理协同化、责任明晰化"为框架,以沙盒监管隔离突破期未知风险、触发式监管管控成熟期存量风险,实现监管节奏与技术扩散同频、手段与风险等级匹配.研究建议,构建与技术平权规律相适配的弹性治理体系,以实现创新活力、产业效率与公共安全的三维均衡.

Technological democratization is an essential feature of the development of emerging industries.For the first time,the"15th Five-Year Plan"outline introduces sandbox regulation and trigger-based regulation for emerging industries,which constitutes an initial response to the regulatory tension under the trend of technological democratization.From the perspective of technological democratization,and integrating analytical methods from regulatory economics,sociology of technology,and evolutionary economics,this study takes the new energy vehicle industry as a context to explore the underlying mechanisms of regulatory failure in new business forms and the pathways for constructing novel regulatory frameworks.The findings reveal that technological democratization,by lowering operational barriers and cost prices,triggers a"bilateral externality"dilemma:on the demand side,risk proliferation and liability vacuum;on the supply side,welfare spillover intertwined with innovation depletion.Accordingly,this paper constructs a theoretical model of"technological democratization-externality governance-regulatory adaptation",and proposes that novel regulation should be framed by"lenient access,flexible enforcement,collaborative governance,and clarified accountability",employing sandbox regulation to isolate unknown risks during the breakthrough phase and trigger-based regulation to control stock risks during the maturity phase,thereby synchronizing regulatory rhythm with technological diffusion and aligning instruments with risk levels.The study suggests building a flexible governance system compatible with the logic of technological democratization,so as to achieve a three-dimensional equilibrium among innovation vitality,industrial efficiency,and public safety.

黄伯平;覃璇子

中共北京市委党校(北京行政学院),北京 100044中共北京市委党校(北京行政学院),北京 100044

管理科学

新兴产业技术平权新型监管方式新能源汽车双侧外部性

emerging industriestechnological empowermentnew regulatory approachesnew energy vehiclestwo-sided externalities

《科学与管理》 2026 (4)

57-64,8

10.3969/j.issn.1003-8256.2026.04.007

评论