首页|期刊导航|江西科学|南昌市蓝绿空间格局对生态系统服务价值的影响

南昌市蓝绿空间格局对生态系统服务价值的影响OA

Impacts of Blue-Green Spatial Pattern on Ecosystem Service Values in Nanchang City

中文摘要英文摘要

快速城市化引发蓝绿空间与景观破碎化,严重削弱其生态服务功能.探究蓝绿景观格局随时间的演变规律以及生态系统服务价值(ESV)对此类变化的响应特征,对优化区域生态格局和精准提升ESV具有重要意义.以国际湿地城市南昌市为研究区域,采用景观格局指数、当量因子法及地理加权回归模型,分析该市2000-2024年景观格局与ESV的时空变化特征,并探究二者之间的关联.结果表明:1)25年间蓝绿空间减少128.78 km2(降幅5%),空间格局呈现中心收缩、外围集聚特征;2)蓝绿空间格局地域分异显著,生态屏障区表现为高聚集度、高连通性、低破碎化与形状简单,中心城区相反;3)ESV先减后增,从2000年730.5亿元降至2010年690.8亿元,2024年回升至704.2亿元,蓝色空间贡献占比超70%;4)景观格局对ESV影响具有空间异质性,聚集度与凝聚力呈正向效应,斑块密度呈负向效应,最大斑块指数正向影响主要集中于东西两侧生态屏障区,景观形状指数与之相反.

Rapid urbanization has triggered severe fragmentation of blue-green spaces and landscapes,substantially impairing their ecological service capacities.Exploring the spatio-temporal evolution of blue-green landscape patterns and the responsive characteristics of e-cosystem service value(ESV)to such variations is critical for optimizing regional ecological spatial layouts and precisely boosting ESV.Taking Nanchang,an international wetland city,as the research area,this study integrated landscape pattern metrics,the value equivalent factor method and geographically weighted regression(GWR)to quantify spatiotemporal variations in landscape configurations and ESV across 2000-2024 and further clarified their correlative mechanisms.The results showed that:1)Blue-green spaces shrank by 128.78 km2(a 5%decline)over the 25-year period,presenting a spatial pattern of central shrink-age and peripheral agglomeration;2)Significant regional differentiation existed in blue-green landscape configurations:ecological barrier zones exhibited high aggregation,strong connectivity,low fragmentation and simple patch shapes,while central urban areas dis-played opposite characteristics;3)ESV followed a decreasing-then-increasing trajectory,dropping from 730.5 billion CNY in 2000 to 690.8 billion CNY in 2010 before rebounding to 704.2 billion CNY in 2024,with blue spaces contributing more than 70%of total ESV;4)Land-scape patterns exerted spatially heterogeneous effects on ESV:Contagion Index(CONTAG)and Cohesion Index(COHESION)exerted positive impacts,whereas Patch Density(PD)produced negative effects.The positive correlation of Largest Patch Index(LPI)with ESV was mainly concentrated in the eastern and western ecological barrier zones,whereas Land-scape Shape Index(LSI)showed the inverse spatial response.

李欣汝;叶长盛

东华理工大学地球与行星学院,330013,南昌东华理工大学地球与行星学院,330013,南昌

资源环境

蓝绿景观生态系统服务价值水网型城市环鄱阳湖城市群

blue-green landscapeecosystem service valuewater network cityPoyang lake urban agglomeration

《江西科学》 2026 (4)

632-643,12

国家自然科学基金项目(4206104).

10.13990/j.issn1001-3679.2026.04.010

评论