知识产权保护方式选择对技术要素收入分配的影响研究OACHSSCD
The Impact of Intellectual Property Protection Choices on the Income Distribution of Technological Factors
随着技术在生产过程中的作用不断增强,如何保障其能够获得与生产贡献相匹配的收益,成为完善要素收入分配制度的重要问题.本文从司法、行政与平台保护 3 个维度构建知识产权保护指标,分析不同知识产权保护的要素收入分配效应以及适用边界.研究发现:(1)加强三类知识产权保护均能够矫正技术市场定价偏差,促进技术要素获得与其贡献相匹配的回报,该影响主要通过提高侵权违法成本与技术市场活跃度实现;(2)三类知识产权保护方式具备不同的适用边界.行政保护具有较强的稳定性,在不同技术结构的地区均能发挥积极作用,司法保护适用于数字创新占比与协同创新水平较低的地区,平台保护在数字创新占比与协同创新水平较高地区的作用更为明显.
As technology becomes increasingly important in production,ensuring that technological inputs receive returns consistent with their contributions has become an important issue in factor income distribution.Using prefecture-level city data,this study constructs measures of judicial,administrative,and platform-based intellectual property protection and examines their distri-butional effects.The results show that all three forms of protection help correct the underpricing of technology and improve the align-ment between technological contributions and returns,mainly by raising infringement costs and promoting technology market activity.Their effects,however,vary across regions.Administrative protection remains effective under different technological conditions.Judicial protection is more effective in regions with lower levels of digital and collaborative innovation,whereas platform-based pro-tection plays a stronger role in regions where both are more developed.
张潇;董直庆;徐超
华东师范大学经济与管理学院,上海 200062浙江财经大学管理学院,杭州 310018华东师范大学经济与管理学院,上海 200062
管理科学
知识产权保护收入分配司法监管行政监管平台监管数字创新技术市场活跃度技术交易
intellectual property protectionincome distributionjudicial regulationadministrative regulationplatform regulationdigital innovationtechnology market activitytechnology transactions
《工业技术经济》 2026 (9)
71-80,10
国家社会科学基金重大项目"人工智能技术变革对我国经济社会发展的影响及对策研究"(项目编号:24&ZD048).
评论