首页|期刊导航|国际护理科学(英文)|非药物干预对老年痴呆患者的有效性:一项伞式综述

非药物干预对老年痴呆患者的有效性:一项伞式综述OA

Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for older adults with dementia:An umbrella review

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 系统性整合相关综述和meta分析,评估非药物干预(non-pharmacological interventions,NPIs)在老年痴呆患者中对躁动、抑郁、焦虑、认知功能及生活质量的影响,并评估证据基础的稳定性与方法学质量.方法 检索MEDLINE、PubMed、CINAHL、PsycINFO和Web of Science数据库从建库至2025年2月的文献.采用系统评价测量评估工具(第2版)评估符合条件的系统综述和meta分析.效应估计值通过标准化均差进行汇总,而各综述之间的重叠部分则使用校正覆盖面积进行量化.结果 共纳入了12项系统综述,包含147项随机对照试验.各综述的方法学质量存在差异,综述间的重叠度极低(CCA=1.8%).采用NPIs后老年痴呆患者轻度但持续的躁动(SMD=-0.25,95%CI:-0.36至-0.13),抑郁(SMD=-0.20,95%CI:-0.29至-0.11),以及焦虑水平均降低(SMD=-0.21,95%CI:-0.34至-0.09);认知功能方面观察到适度改善(SMD=0.22,95%CI:0.11至0.34),而生活质量则未发现显著影响(SMD=0.08,95%CI:-0.15至0.32).信息与通信技术干预、按摩与触摸疗法以及体育锻炼显示出有益效果.关于躁动、抑郁和焦虑的证据确定性为中等,而认知功能和生活质量的证据确定性较低或极低.结论 非药物干预与痴呆老年人在躁动、抑郁、焦虑和认知功能方面的轻微但持续改善相关.尽管各结果的效果量较小,且证据的确定性存在差异,但研究结果支持将非药物干预措施作为以个体为中心的痴呆护理的关键组成部分.未来需要开展更多高质量的研究,以明确不同护理环境中最佳的干预方式、剂量、作用机制及实施策略.

Objective:This umbrella review aimed to synthesize systematic reviews and meta-analyses to evaluate the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions(NPIs)on agitation,depression,anxiety,cognitive function,and quality of life in individuals living with dementia,and to examine the stability and methodological quality of the evidence base. Methods:Systematic searches of MEDLINE(via EBSCOhost),PubMed,CINAHL,PsycINFO,and Web of Science databases were conducted from inception to February 2025.Systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating NPIs for older adults with dementia were included.Methodological quality was assessed using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2(AMSTAR 2).Evidence overlap was quantified using the corrected covered area(CCA),and effect estimates reported in the included reviews were synthesized narratively. Results:Twelve systematic reviews,including 147 randomized controlled trials,were included.Meth-odological quality varied across reviews,and all reviews had at least one non-critical weakness.Review overlap was very slight(CCA=1.8%).Across reviews,NPIs were associated with small but consistent reductions in agitation(standardized mean difference([SMD]-0.25,95%CI:-0.36 to-0.13),depression([SMD]-0.20,95%CI:-0.29 to-0.11),and anxiety([SMD]-0.21,95%CI:-0.34 to-0.09).A modest improvement was observed in cognitive function([SMD]0.22,95%CI:0.11 to 0.34),whereas no sig-nificant effect was found for quality of life([SMD]0.08,95%CI:-0.15 to 0.32).The most consistent benefits were reported for information and communication technology-based interventions,massage and touch therapies,and physical exercise.Evidence certainty was moderate for agitation,depression,and anxiety,but low or very low for cognitive function and quality of life. Conclusion:NPIs were associated with small but consistent improvements in agitation,depression,anxiety,and cognitive function among older adults with dementia.Although effect sizes were modest and evidence certainty varied across outcomes,the findings support NPIs as key components of person-centered dementia care.Further high-quality research is needed to clarify optimal intervention mo-dalities,dosage,mechanisms of action,and implementation strategies across diverse care settings.

Taeko Saito;Natsumi Shimizu;姚利

老年人躁动焦虑痴呆抑郁补充疗法系统综述

AgedAgitationAnxietyComplementary therapiesDementiaDepressionSystematic review

《国际护理科学(英文)》 2026 (4)

380-386,7

This study was supported by a research grant from the Insur-ance Union of Societies Related to Nursing.The article processing charge(APC)was supported by the DAIGAKU TOKUBETSU KEN-KYUHI Grant(Musashino University).

10.1016/j.ijnss.2026.06.008

评论