应对限容的城市更新契约类型选择与武汉实践OACHSSCD
Urban Renewal Contract Choices and Wuhan Practice under FAR Constraint:The Perspective of Barzel's Tenancy Contract Theory
新制度经济学产权理论代表巴泽尔以地主—佃农三种契约类型为例,探讨正交易成本下的契约选择问题.城市更新是多主体反复博弈达成契约的过程.紧扣"限容"下"多元利益"与"公共增益"两难,聚焦更新中主体间契约选择,揭示理论"嫁接"三处局限:产权让渡方式差异、事前成本治理方式有别、内部竞租中外部性被忽略.构建"契约类型—事前成本—外部性影响及干预—实施成效"框架,并进行三方面拓展:增加"产权让渡方式"维度,形成四种基础契约;以土地一级市场更新为例,运用租差理论界定事前交易成本构成,并结合武汉实践进行测度;借鉴控制权理论分析契约中各主体影响更新外部性的作用机制,并开展实证分析.实践揭示:交易成本与契约存在双向影响,让原权益人参与剩余索取或经营阶段收益分成可降低事前成本.外部性干预(政府审批、公众参与等)可纠偏机会主义行为,防止负外部效应."政府统筹—平台嵌入—规划赋能"协同治理有望摆脱"高容积换效益"路径依赖.以期为限容下更新契约设计提供理论工具,为无法依赖高容积的项目提供借鉴.
As a representative of new institutional economics,Barzel examines con-tract choices under positive transaction costs by analyzing three types of landlord-tenant contracts.Urban renewal is a process of repeated bargaining leading to con-tracts.Focusing on the dilemma between"diverse interests"and"public benefits"un-der floor area ratio(FAR)constraints,and examining contract choices among actors,the study identifies three limitations in applying Barzel's theory to urban renewal:dif-ferences in property rights transfer,variations in the governance of ex-ante costs,and neglect of externalities in rent seeking behavior.The study develops an analyti-cal framework of"contract types-ex-ante costs-effects and interventions on exter-nalities-implementation outcomes"through three extensions.First,it introduces a"property rights transfer"dimension,expanding the original framework into four ba-sic contract types.Second,it incorporates rent gap theory to define ex-ante transac-tion costs in primary land market renewal and measures them within Wuhan's con-text.Third,it applies control rights theory to analyze how different actors shape re-newal externalities.The findings reveal that transaction costs and contract choices in-teract dynamically,enabling original rights-holders to participate in residual claims or operational-stage benefit sharing can reduce such costs.Externality interventions,such as government approval and public participation,can reduce opportunism and prevent negative effects.Furthermore,the integration of government coordination,platform embedding,and planning empowerment may help overcome the path depen-dency of high FAR for high gains.The study offers theoretical tools for contract de-sign under FAR constraints and provides practical insights for urban renewal projects that cannot rely on high FAR.
王玮;黄焕;游畅;汪波宁;陈垚磊
武汉市规划研究院(武汉市交通发展战略研究院)生态园林规划所武汉市规划研究院(武汉市交通发展战略研究院)武汉市规划研究院(武汉市交通发展战略研究院)生态园林规划所武汉市规划研究院(武汉市交通发展战略研究院)城市设计策划所武汉市规划研究院(武汉市交通发展战略研究院)生态园林规划所
建筑与水利
新制度经济学巴泽尔契约类型城市更新限容
new institutional econom-icsBarzelcontract choiceurban re-newalFAR-constraint
《城市规划学刊》 2026 (3)
72-80,9
评论