外周灌注指数与乳酸导向的风险预测模型对中老年急性心力衰竭合并低灌注患者预后的预测价值OA
Predictive value of peripheral perfusion index and lactate-oriented risk prediction model for prognosis in middle-aged and elderly patients with acute heart failure combined with hypoperfusion
目的 构建基于外周灌注指数(PI)与血乳酸(Lac)水平的风险预测模型,旨在深入评估该模型对中老年急性心力衰竭(AHF)合并组织低灌注患者短期死亡风险的预测效能.方法 采用回顾性研究方法.选择 2021 年 12 月至 2024 年 12 月南京医科大学附属南京医院收治的 80 例确诊为AHF且伴有组织低灌注的中老年患者作为研究.研究以入院后 28 d全因病死率作为主要终点事件,依据最终生存状态将患者分为生存组与死亡组.收集两组患者基线临床特征,包括人口学资料(性别、年龄)、既往基础疾病史,以及入院 24 h内的关键生化与血流动力学及超声心动图指标,包括血乳酸(Lac)、N末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)、肌酸激酶(CK)、肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)、心肌肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)、中心静脉压(CVP)、左室射血分数(LVEF)、外周灌注指数(PI)、急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ).比较不同预后两组上述资料的差异.将单因素分析中差异有统计学意义的指标纳入二分类多因素Logistic回归分析,并据此构建列线图预测工具.最后,综合运用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)、校准曲线及决策曲线分析(DCA)多维度验证模型的区分度、校准度及临床净获益.结果 最终纳入 80 例符合标准的AHF伴组织低灌注患者,28 d共发生死亡 40 例,病死率达50%.生存组与死亡组性别、年龄、基础心脏疾病类型、NT-proBNP、CK、CK-MB、cTnI、CVP及LVEF比较差异均无统计学意义.死亡组APACHEⅡ评分、Lac水平明显高于生存组[APACHEⅡ评分(分):22.53±4.93 比16.05±1.91,Lac(mmol/L):2.79±0.55比 2.46±0.22,均P<0.05],PI明显低于生存组(0.99±0.22比 1.24±0.21,P<0.05).多因素Logistic回归分析显示,低PI[优势比(OR)=0.371,95%可信区间(95%CI)为 0.231~0.496,P=0.001]、高Lac(OR=2.022,95%CI为 1.076~4.810,P=0.042)以及高APACHEⅡ评分(OR=1.724,95%CI为 1.256~2.366,P=0.001)是中老年AHF合并低灌注患者不良预后的独立危险因素.基于上述 3 个独立预测因子,构建了死亡风险预测方程:Logit P=-8.677-5.611×PI+0.705×Lac+0.545×APACHEⅡ评分.模型效能评估结果显示,该预测模型的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)高达 0.940(95%CI为 0.900~0.990),显示出良好的区分能力;Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验结果显示:x2=3.271,P=0.916,表明模型校准度良好;DCA亦提示该模型在广泛的阈值概率范围内有显著的临床实用价值.结论 低PI、高Lac、高APACHEⅡ评分是决定中老年AHF合并低灌注患者预后的关键独立危险因素.由这 3 项指标整合构建的风险预测模型表现出良好的预测性能,可为临床早期识别高危患者及制定个体化干预策略提供有力的量化依据.
Objective To develop a risk prediction model based on peripheral perfusion index(PI)and blood lactate acid(Lac)levels,aiming to thoroughly evaluate the predictive efficacy of this model for short-term mortality risk in elderly patients with acute heart failure(AHF)complicated by tissue hypoperfusion.Methods A retrospective study was conducted involving 80 middle-aged and elderly patients diagnosed with AHF and accompanied by tissue hypoperfusion,who were admitted to Nanjing Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University from December 2021 to December 2024.The primary endpoint event was the all-cause mortality rate within 28 days after admission.Patients were divided into survival and death groups based on their final survival status.Baseline clinical characteristics of both groups were collected,including demographic data(gender,age),history of previous underlying diseases,and key biochemical,hemodynamic and echocardiographic indicators within 24 hours of admission,including blood Lac,N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide(NT-proBNP),creatine kinase(CK),MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase(CK-MB),cardiac troponin I(cTnI),central venous pressure(CVP),left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF),peripheral perfusion index(PI),and acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ(APACHEⅡ).Differences in these parameters between the two groups were compared.Statistically significant variables identified in univariate analysis were included in a binary multivariate Logistic regression analysis,and a column plot prediction tool was subsequently developed.Finally,the discriminatory power,calibration,and clinical net benefit of the model were comprehensively validated using receiver operator characteristic curve(ROC curve),calibration curves,and decision curve analysis(DCA).Results Ultimately,80 patients with AHF accompanied by hypoperfusion who met the criteria were included.A total of 40 deaths occurred within 28 days,with a case fatality rate of 50%.There were no statistically significant differences in gender composition,age distribution,underlying disease spectrum,NT-proBNP,CK,CK-MB,cTnI,CVP,and LVEF between the survival and death groups.The APACHEⅡscore and Lac level in the death group were significantly higher than those in the survival group[APACHEⅡscore:22.53±4.93 vs.16.05±1.91,Lac(mmol/L):2.79±0.55 vs.2.46±0.22,both P<0.05],PI was significantly lower than that in the survival group(0.99±0.22 vs.1.24±0.21,P<0.05).Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that low PI[odds ratio(OR)=0.371,95%confidence interval(95%CI)was 0.231-0.496,P=0.001],high Lac(OR=2.022,95%CI was 1.076-4.810,P=0.042),and high APACHEⅡscore(OR=1.724,95%CI was 1.256-2.366,P=0.001)were independent risk factors for poor prognosis in elderly patients with AHF accompanied by hypoperfusion.Based on these 3 independent predictors,a mortality risk prediction equation was constructed:Logit P=-8.677-5.611×PI+0.705×Lac+0.545×APACHEⅡ.Model performance evaluation results showed that area under the curve(AUC)of this prediction model was as high as 0.940(95%CI was 0.900-0.990),indicating good discriminatory ability;the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test results showed:x2=3.271,P=0.916,indicating good model calibration;DCA also suggests that the model has significant clinical utility across a wide range of threshold probabilities.Conclusions The low PI,high Lac,and high APACHEⅡscores are key independent risk factors determining the prognosis of middle-aged and elderly patients with AHF complicated by hypoperfusion.The risk prediction model constructed by integrating these 3 indicators demonstrates good predictive performance and can provide a strong quantitative basis for early clinical identification of high-risk patients and the development of individualized intervention strategies.
张宏亮;陈立文;吴丹;鲍磊;秦海东
南京医科大学附属南京医院急诊科,江苏 南京 210006||中国药科大学附属浦口中医院急诊科 211800南京医科大学附属南京医院急诊科,江苏 南京 210006南京医科大学附属南京医院急诊科,江苏 南京 210006南京医科大学附属南京医院急诊科,江苏 南京 210006南京医科大学附属南京医院急诊科,江苏 南京 210006
急性心力衰竭外周灌注指数血乳酸风险预测模型预后评估
Acute heart failurePeripheral perfusion indexBlood lactate acidRisk prediction modelPrognostic assessment
《中国中西医结合急救杂志》 2026 (3)
306-311,6
江苏省南京市卫生科技发展项目(YKK22115)Nanjing Health Science and Technology Development Project of Jiangsu Province(YKK22115)
评论