玻璃体注射法瑞西单抗治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的效果OA
Effect of intravitreal injection of faricimab in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration
目的 分析玻璃体内注射法瑞西单抗注射液治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)的临床疗效和安全性.方法 将nAMD患者,随机分为对照组与试验组组,2组均按照3+PRN方案治疗(前3个月每4周注射1次,第4个月开始每4周随访1次,直至24周),术前3天均予以0.5%盐酸莫西沙星滴眼液滴眼(每天4次),对照组予以玻璃体内注射阿柏西普注射液(每次2.0 mg),试验组予以玻璃体内注射法瑞西单抗注射液(每次0.05 mL).比较对照组和试验组治疗前、治疗4周、治疗8周、治疗12周、治疗24周的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、黄斑中心凹视网膜厚度(CMT)、脉络膜毛细血管层血流密度(CCVD)及补充治疗情况,并进行安全性评价.结果 本研究共入组80例,对照组与试验组各40例.治疗12周时,对照组和试验组的总有效率分别为72.50(29例/40例)和为75.00(30例/40例),在统计学上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗4周时,对照组和试验组的BCVA分别为0.71±0.10和0.68±0.11,CMT分别为(322.25±30.25)和(317.35±33.18)pm,CCVD 分别为(63.87±2.11)%和(63.45±2.65)%;治疗8周时,对照组和试验组的BCVA分别为0.59±0.12和 0.55±0.13,CMT 分别为(296.22±28.35)和(288.18±26.59)μm,CCVD 分别为(63.11±2.75)%和(62.88±2.61)%;治疗12周时,对照组和试验组的BCVA 分别为0.39±0.08 和 0.37±0.07,CMT 分别为(282.14±27.22)和(273.46±25.19)μm,CCVD 分别为(62.07±2.74)%和(61.77±2.83)%;治疗24周时,对照组和试验组的BCVA分别为0.43±0.11和0.40±0.09,CMT分别为(303.58±50.64)和(281.49±27.12)μm,CCVD 分别为(63.61±3.10)%和(62.24±2.86)%.除治疗24周时,试验组的CMT和CCVD均显著低于对照组(均P<0.05),2组治疗前及治疗后不同时间比较,上述指标在统计学上差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).对照组和试验组24周内的补充治疗人次分别为10例(25.00%)和2例(5.00%)(P<0.05).2组药物不良反应包括白内障、结膜出血、玻璃体脱落、眼内压升高、玻璃体飞蚊症、眼痛,对照组和试验组总药物不良反应发生率分别为20.00%(8例/40例)和12.50%(5例/40例),在统计学上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 玻璃体内注射法瑞西单抗注射液治疗nAMD的整体疗效与安全性与阿柏西普注射液相近,但在在疗效持续性方面更有优势.
Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy and safety of intravitreal injection of faricimab injection in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration(nAMD).Methods Patients with nAMD were randomly divided into control group and treatment group.Both groups were treated according to the 3+PRN protocol(1 injection every 4 weeks for the first 3 months,and one follow-up every 4 weeks from the 4th month until 24 weeks).At 3 days before surgery,0.5%moxifloxacin hydrochloride eye drops were administered(4 times a day)to both groups.The control group was treated with intravitreal injection of aflibercept injection(2.0 mg each time),while the treatment group was treated with intravitreal injection of faricimab injection(0.05 mL each time).The best corrected visual acuity(BCVA),central macular thickness(CMT)and choriocapillaris vessel density(CCVD)before treatment and at 4 weeks,8 weeks,12 weeks and 24 weeks of treatment as well as supplementary treatment situations were compared between control group and treatment group,and the safety evaluation was performed.Results A total of 80 patients were enrolled in this study,comprising 40 cases in control group and 40 cases in treatment group.At 12 weeks of treatment,the total effective rate in control group was 72.50%(29 cases/40 cases)and that in treatment group was 75.00%(30 cases/40 cases),without statistically significant difference(P>0.05).At 4 weeks of treatment,BCVA of control group and treatment group were 0.71±0.10 and 0.68±0.11,respectively;CMT were(322.25±30.25)and(317.35±33.18)pum,respectively;CCVD were(63.87±2.11)%and(63.45±2.65)%,respectively.At 8 weeks of treatment,BCVA of control group and treatment group were 0.59±0.12 and 0.55±0.13,respectively;CMT were(296.22±28.35)and(288.18±26.59)μm,respectively;CCVD were(63.11±2.75)%and(62.88±2.61)%,respectively.At 12 weeks of treatment,BCVA of control group and treatment group were 0.39±0.08 and 0.37±0.07,respectively;CMT were(282.14±27.22)and(273.46±25.19)μm,respectively;CCVD were(62.07±2.74)%and(61.77±2.83)%,respectively.At 24 weeks of treatment,BCVA of control group and treatment group were 0.43±0.11 and 0.40±0.09,respectively;CMT were(303.58±50.64)and(281.49±27.12)pum,respectively;CCVD were(63.61±3.10)%and(62.24±2.86)%,respectively.At 24 weeks of treatment,the differences of CMT and the CCVD values in control group and treatment group were all statistically significant(all P<0.05).Except these,the differences of above indicators in control group and treatment group in different time were not all statistically significant(all P>0.05).The number of patients requiring supplementary treatment within 24 weeks was 10 cases(25.00%)in control group and 2 cases(5.00%)in treatment group(P<0.05).Adverse drug reactions included cataract,conjunctival hemorrhage,vitreous detachment,elevated intraocular pressure,vitreous floaters and eye pain.The overall incidence rate of adverse drug reactions of control group and treatment group were 20.00%(8 cases/40 cases)and 12.50%(5 cases/40 cases):without statistically significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusion The overall efficacy and safety of intravitreal injection of faricimab in the treatment of nAMD are similar to those of aflibercept injection,but it has more advantages in the persistence of efficacy.
包旻琦;朱姗;吴辰欣;许伊勒
浙江中医药大学,浙江 杭州 311500||杭州市第一人民医院桐庐医院/桐庐县第一人民医院眼科,浙江 杭州 311500杭州市第一人民医院桐庐医院/桐庐县第一人民医院眼科,浙江 杭州 311500杭州市第一人民医院桐庐医院/桐庐县第一人民医院眼科,浙江 杭州 311500杭州市第一人民医院眼科,浙江 杭州 311500
医药卫生
法瑞西单抗注射液新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性玻璃体内注射疗效
faricimab injectionneovascular age-related macular degenerationintravitreal injectionefficacy
《中国临床药理学杂志》 2026 (12)
1686-1691,6
浙江省医药卫生科技计划基金资助项目(2020KY212)
评论